All Channels
Popular
190°

You may not be the only controller after E3 2011

From the 123Kinect article: "Granted, they’ve got the ‘You are the controller‘-slogan that needs an update after that, but there’s not much more withholding them from adding an extra peripheral to the Kinect mix. Price-cut? No. Additional controller, same price: Yes."

Read Full Story >>
123kinect.com
CountDracula5523d ago (Edited 5523d ago )

Good idea. I bet Oprah is gonna be looking at a big pay day real soon! That fat cow's audience will buy anything.

rezzah5523d ago

heard her last show is coming up, it may be next week or something.

NO MORE OPRAAAAAAHHHHHHH

=D D=

DMason5523d ago

Did anyone actually read this article? There is no controller, no mention of a controller, not even an allusion to a controller.

This guy is just guessing that MS will introduce a Kinect controller.

MasFlowKiller5523d ago (Edited 5523d ago )

I hope is not a camera with a peripheral. cause i thing thats been done

but i don’t think they were talking about that, maybe just new technical features like AR or stuff like that probably

5523d ago Replies(3)
Rainstorm815523d ago (Edited 5523d ago )

Time for the flip flopping, all the guys/fans backing Kinect and it's revolutionary never before seen controller-less gameplay will now further support the controller + camera gameplay that made PS Move so much like the Wii, and Kinect so different. Buttons ARE needed for core games....end of story

But hey one positive to this, MS may take a page out of Sony's playbook and make games that interests me & majority of the 360 fanbase if it does indeed get a controller,then i'd be up to purchase one.... Time will tell.

candystop5523d ago

So what games made strictly for Move interest you? If I remember correctly Kinect exclusives games are much cooler and fun then any Move exclusive title. Also I'm talking about Move only games and not patch games or optional controller titles.

OT: It would be great if they made a analog controller for it but suck if they spent all E3 talking about Kinect again.

Rainstorm815523d ago (Edited 5523d ago )

None to be perfectly honest, Sports Champions is ok i guess & Tumble maybe, but then again thats not what im looking for.

Im looking for a new way to enjoy games that i already enjoy playing. It would be great to play Halo Gears fable...etc with Kinect + controller periphial.

In my eyes Kinect and Move are controllers, and like any controller i want to use it with games i prefer.

Options are better, Forza and GT can be used with a wheel and a controller, it doesnt mean that its not a steering wheel game...you know?

Edit:
and i agree it would suck if they spent majority of e3 on kinect

Just_The_Truth5523d ago

@candy- sports champions is really amazing it's really to accurate to the point it hard, echocrome 2 and tumble are just as incredible and i really had fun with start the party and the shoot i still really want to try the fight and why not include games like KZ3 or RE5 you can still play the whole game original game with it.

shadow27975523d ago

Sorcery? You know, a full gaming experience. Not a mini-game. If I remember correctly, Kinect doesn't have any of those.

And why does it have to be Move only? How do great games that are Move compatible make the device less valuable? It's a new way to play the kind of games I like to play. What's wrong with that?

candystop5523d ago

Sorcery looks like a cool game but I was talking about launch titles.

"And why does it have to be Move only? How do great games that are Move compatible make the device less valuable? It's a new way to play the kind of games I like to play. What's wrong with that?"

There is nothing wrong with playing on an optional controller. What I'm saying is if your going to compare it against Kinect at least compare to exclusive titles (unique experiences)made for it.

Rainstorm815523d ago (Edited 5523d ago )

Its an unfair comparison, Kinect has virtually no optional support games, unless you count Harry potter and Child of eden.

Move is going the other way with virtually no move-only games, other than a few like sports champions and tumble....i dont count sorcery because who knows when it will launch.

So its hard to make that comparison, the best thing to do is compare games that use move then games that use kinect. Why segment them to launch titles and dedicated control schemes.

jimbone795523d ago (Edited 5523d ago )

Once again with the "they said you are the controller, What’s the point" arguments. Once again they forget they have said from the beginning that there will be 3 types of games traditional, hybrid, and you are the controller. They said this long before it was Kinect.
Here you go.
http://www.strategyinformer...
There are dozens of these articles from 2009 if you just look. They are not going back on what they said, and they are not defeating the point. Please stop with this very lame argument because it has no legs.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5523d ago
Trroy5523d ago (Edited 5523d ago )

Well.. tbh, that's what Kinect needs to be a serious gaming peripheral. Buttons, and an accurate way to point at the screen.

I'll be cool if they bundle it in for free. It'll suck if they charge existing Kinect owners $25-30 for one, though.

Stealth20k5523d ago Show
Titanz5523d ago

I wanna know what it will look like.

Trroy5523d ago (Edited 5523d ago )

I'd wager that the games they announced previously, like Steel Battalion and Panzer Dragoon, may actually require either this peripheral or a regular controller. If it exists, the devs have probably had it for over a year already.

longcat5523d ago (Edited 5523d ago )

Well, the sales game will continue....hardcore gamers seem to love it. Consider this a DLC for the sales game

Show all comments (39)
20°

Joy Ride Turbo - The Beginning of the End for Xbox Kinect

Joy Ride Turbo launched 10 years ago today. The first title was Xbox Kinect exclusive, yet this sequel failed to support the device at all.

300°

10 of the Biggest Video Game Hardware Failures Ever

Cultured Vultures: "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal, and no matter how much developers might try, some gaming hardware just fails to hit the mark. We’ve compiled a list of 10 gaming hardware fails, and boy did some fail hard."

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Knightofelemia1572d ago

I would label the Power Glove, Kinect, and that Tony Hawk skateboard more as hardware addons hardware failure would be like the Virtual Boy and one day Stadia.

Magog1572d ago

Kinect was bundled with every Xbox One and inflated the price on an already underpowered and low RAM machine so for the One it wasn't an accessory as much as a white elephant.

CaptainHenry9161572d ago (Edited 1572d ago )

Definitely the RROD but that power glove had a lot of issues as well. The Kinect just didn't work

1572d ago
CrimsonWing691572d ago

Hardware add-ons are more like RAM or a video card, basically components that enhance capabilities or performance of the computer.

If you really want to get technical the Kinect is more of a peripheral device, kind of like a keyboard or mouse to a computer.

ThatsGaming1572d ago

The person in this article obviously is not up on their gaming history....

Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast, Coleco Gemini, Commodore 128, Commodore Amiga, Atari 5200, Atari 7800 were all massive failures and in most cases cost their companies participating in future gaming generations.

Gamer791571d ago

Sega saturn (successful in Japan) and dreamcast were not failures.
Seems like you're not up on you're gaming history

septemberindecember1571d ago

@Gamer79

How in the world are the Sega Saturn and Dreamcast not seen as failures? They both sold around 8M each, which is much lower than the ~30M that the Genesis had sold before it, and even the Master System before that. They were both the worst selling consoles in their respective generation (PS1, N64 outsold Saturn, PS2, GC, and Xbox outsold Dreamcast). Both of the consoles were incredibly short lived. The Saturn was discontinued in every territory but Japan after just three years. In Japan the console was discontinued after six years. Meanwhile the Dreamcast was discontinued worldwide in 2001 after launching in most territories in 1999 and in Japan in 1998. The failure of the Saturn and Dreamcast lead to Sega pulling out of the hardware market. Which, by the way, all of this occurred when Sega was massively dropping the price of their consoles quickly to compete. Sega was hemorrhaging money at this point.

None of this indicates a successful console. Saying the Saturn was a success because it did better in Japan is like saying the Vita is a success (they both sold around the same amount of units in Japan). Even the Wii U outsold these consoles worldwide.

Magog1572d ago

The picture should be the 360 RROD. When I think of gaming hardware failures that's what springs to mind. Kinect and it's bundled price tag definitely hobbled the already underpowered Xbox One though for sure so I would give it a close second place.

porkChop1572d ago (Edited 1572d ago )

That's not what the author means by failures. It's about hardware that failed in terms of sales (Wii U) or just failed to deliver on its promise (Kinect).

Magog1572d ago (Edited 1572d ago )

Given that the 360 had a year head start, much easier hardware to develop for, was cheaper, and still ended up in third place I think it qualifies especially when you factor in the frustration and huge losses incurred by RROD.

porkChop1571d ago

Selling over 80 million consoles isn't a sales flop. We get it, you don't like Xbox, but that doesn't mean the 360 is suddenly a failure.

Rhythmattic1571d ago

Porky....
You know how many people I know bought a 2nd or third 360 due to RROD? Even when MS had to confront the issue with replacement systems, my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in, and waiting for a replacement.,,..,..
If that's how you consider it a win... OK.. but so is having 5 , of which 3 don't function.... Its a win win....mwhahahahaha

porkChop1571d ago

"my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in"

You're acting like it would take months. When I sent my 360 in I got a new one literally 5 days later. As soon as MS had tracking confirmation that you sent yours, they'd send a new one to you the same day. No one is going to spend hundreds to buy a new console instead of waiting a week. I swear you guys pull some of the dumbest shit out of nowhere and think people will actually believe it.

Regardless, none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about.

Rhythmattic1570d ago (Edited 1570d ago )

Porky
"You're acting like it would take months"
Sometimes it could.. FFS.. 'Strya here...
Best turnaround I reckon was 2-3 weeks.....
Either way, My mates experiences still exist.. So Sorry, no point trying to earn Xbox Achievements when it doesn't feature in what was a situation you never dealt with,,,,
3 of my friends would disagree (overall, 10 extra Xboxes purchased)
Regardless.. MS sold a lot of 360's that was due to this reason.. That is sales. Fact

"none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about."
Headline says HELLO !
Oh and "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal," that's enough to pass this on without taking your article bias into consideration.....
As for the rest.... Ok.. But you've actually gone out of your way to give MS a Pass... Fap on.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1570d ago
Aloymetal1572d ago (Edited 1572d ago )

Yup, and because of that big fiasco MS had to fork out 1 billion but knowing them I think they're very proud of the 360, it's the only time a MS console reached 80mil+ sales, RROD played a big part of that and a record they will never break again.

Rhythmattic1571d ago (Edited 1571d ago )

So true.. Even when MS accepted they where caught out in the biggest lie of any generation, The wait for a replacement was outweighed by just buying another, and having one be returned as a backup, which, btw, generally failed on first swap.
I own honestly can't believe MS tards are just supporting , or arguing why and what MS did by just dismissing it....

lonewolf101572d ago

Lol I had the Atari Jaguar, surprised its "competition" the 3DO isn't on the list too, both as "popular" as each other.

SullysCigar1572d ago

Lol same. Played the crap out of Aliens Vs Predator and Tempest 2000 .... aaand that's about it really!!

lonewolf101572d ago

Sad but true that was pretty much it.

Kurt Russell1572d ago

Agreed, I never actually saw a 3DO make it to retailers in the UK. At least the Atari Jaguar was sold for around 6 months.

lonewolf101571d ago

It made it to some my brother got one, fared just as well as the Jaguar so most probably hard to find in general.

darthv721572d ago

3do had way better games. Jaguar not so much. Neo Geo sold less than both and yet isnt considered a failure. Go figure.

LWOGaming1572d ago

Stadia is a weird one. It hasn’t sold at all well but in terms of how it works it’s still miles ahead of Xcloud in terms of stability and performance. Xcloud is still a way behind and that needs sorting but it will be in time. Stadia for me is one of those things that will go down as a what could have been moments. With better marketing it could have been a roaring success. I still play it and it remains the best place in my opinion to play CyberPunk 2077. Only platform I have played it on without having any issues at all. The tech is great. The concept is fine. Marketing terrible. Shame really.

Magog1572d ago

The sales model was awful. They should have teamed with an existing player to allow for local and cloud access to games or a gaming subscription service.

LWOGaming1572d ago

It was a strange mess from such a huge company, as I said, as a system it works really well but without gamers it’s nothing. Such a waste,

LWOGaming1572d ago

The Xbox One was Microsoft’s Nintendo Wii U. Undercooked, undersold and just an unholy mess. The thing is with any of these failures is to learn from them and thankfully both Nintendo and Xbox did just that to the benefit of gamers everywhere.

Show all comments (39)
120°

Pivotal Decisions in Gaming History - Xbox Goes All-In on Kinect

Xbox 360's Kinect had flopped yet Microsoft insisted on mandatory Kinect for Xbox One, driving the price up and alienating their potential customers.

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
darthv721749d ago

the tech was pretty damn good but their focus on making it the centerpiece was not. Had they opted to keep it as a secondary or even tertiary device, it may have found new use for AR/VR.

PrimeVinister1749d ago

Maybe. But they were two early for VR and too late for motion control

1748d ago Replies(2)
Godmars2901748d ago

Their focus was marketing metrics. Information gathering for targeted advertising. Also "event curating" or head counting for special TV events. If MS had had their way with always online and mandatory Kinect pre COVID, as and during it they'd likely be turning into dominant presence in many Western homes. Be getting subsidized by Disney and other streamers as well as the NFL.

Thing was, Kinect as an actual game system, its games, just weren't ready. MS moved on it too soon. Thankfully.

Atticus_finch1748d ago

Sorry but it was incredibly bad for gaming. The thing barely worked as intended and the games were broken shovelware. And let's not forget all the lies from Xbox to try and sell it. What happened to Milo?
It's like Xbox it's a perpetual lying machine.

PrimeVinister1748d ago

I had almost forgotten about Milo. It looks so unbelievable in retrospect. How did anyone believe it?!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1748d ago
TheEnigma3131748d ago

Kinect requirement, TV focused, DRM, and $100 buried Xbone before it even stared.

PrimeVinister1748d ago (Edited 1748d ago )

I think Kinect was the worst of the bunch. They reversed DRM overnight and try to play down the TV stuff when they realised it made them look disinterested in gaming.

Kinect stuck around for six months, preventing sales and making more and more people upset when they dropped the Kinect and the price.

Atticus_finch1748d ago

Don't forget the inferior hardware which affects their game development to this day.
And the constant boasting and lying that hasn't change very much to this day.

kayoss1748d ago

I was kind of excited for the kinect. It had potential. That was until i tried it at one of their Microsoft store. The thing was so laggy and worker who was there, had no clue what he was doing. It kind of made rethink about buying an Xbox One with Kinect.

PrimeVinister1748d ago

I had already been turned off of the idea by Kinect for 360. Even when it worked, the games were bad and showed no potential.

Wii made you understand what they were going to do with it within about 10 seconds of Wii Sports. It went on to become a bit of a joke but at least it worked and had a purpose.

Thundercat771748d ago

The damage to the Xbox brand was so hard that til this day they are just the last place brand in the market.

PrimeVinister1748d ago

Totally. They haven't been really all that relevant since.

Godmars2901748d ago

That has to do with repeatedly failing, having to reaffirm only to again fail at creating a competent flow of decent games.

@PrimeVinister:
Until Game Pass and BC are mentioned. Only for the point to be missed.

kayoss1748d ago

thats because they dont know what they want to be. A gaming console, Television, or a gaming service?

Godmars2901748d ago

@kayoss:
They wanted, expected, to be Steam. To have everyone coming to them and paying for the privilege. That's the exact mentality on display when they tried to push always online.

brewin1748d ago

Its sad because the Xbox one version of Kinect was actually pretty solid. Not for motion games, I couldnt care less about those, but for the other features that are now commonplace in the gaming ecosystem. Things like voice control and optional motion features in games. Stuff that Sony did with the PS camera was pretty sweet and they could have done some of that stuff with Kinect.

The tech was pretty sweet when implemented right though. Who remembers the implementation in Dead Rising 3?! You could lure zombies away by saying stuff into the kinect, it was a bit hokey at first, but it actually enhanced the game significantly once you learned all the different voice commands. There was and still is nothing else like that!

The focus on TV seemed to be an issue for people, but the TV pass through had some real potential. They could have had cable companies giving the XBone out instead of cable boxes! I understood what they were trying to do, but they needed to show the games too, and thats where they lost the core gamers. Being able to jump right to a sports event or TV show with out leaving the console was actually a pretty cool thing. I spent many nights switching between NHL games or TV shows and jumping right back into my games seamlessly, just by telling Kinect to do so. It was better than people care to admit, but I loved it!

People say XBone had no games, but on launch I got Dead Rising 3, AC Black Flag, Watch Dogs, Killer Instinct, Battlefield 4, Forza 5, and Ryse. That was actually a pretty solid lineup in hindsight! Then later on it got gems like Quantum Break, Dead Rising 4, Sunset Overdrive, Gears 4 and 5, the Ori games, Rare Replay, Forza Horizon 3/4, State of Decay 2, ReCore (SUPER UNDERRATED GEM), Halo 5, Halo Wars 2, and all the great 3rd party stuff as well! I dare anyone who sat on the Xbox One to go back and give it a shot now.

It was actually a pretty great console all things considered. Yes the PS4 had better 1st party stuff, stuff that MS just couldnt top or even compete with, but there are some really great games that a lot of people missed out on that they would probably really enjoy if they actually played them. Thats why I recommend a Series S and Gamepass to a lot of people, as its a great way to get an awesome lineup pf games for super cheap!

Show all comments (22)