
Every generation has one game, one game that is critically acclaimed, innovative, and an all around solid gaming experience that for some reason just doesn’t resonate with the audience. Last generation no game exemplified this better than Beyond Good and Evil. This generation? It's Enslaved.

VGChartz's Lee Mehr: "A game's lead voice actor may get the lion's share of the lines, but that doesn't diminish the importance of secondary characters – as well as their respective performances. This year was a balance of bigger and more modest budgets than last year. It speaks to how casting the right talent to inhabit said role goes further than dumping a truckload of money. No middle-market title exemplifies that more than Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 (with ~$10 million to spare), leading the pack with two finalists."

Just accidentally casting some of the biggest names in games, no big deal.
Is it possible that having an "all star voice actor lineup" is why the development costs of games has skyrocketed?

Ben Starr, Charlie Cox, Jennifer English, and Andy Serkis join the cast of our new turn-based RPG.
No Beyond Good and Evil was a good game.
No, but it is beyond bad. Not in a good way neither.
The game was fantastic, Shame about the ps3 fanboy hate campaign.
Agreed. Enslaved is a good game like Beyond Good and Evil was. Only one thing to add, BG&E was not that masterwork.
Why is their so many articles about enslaved? I played it finished it, and trust me it wasn't anything special. Lucky I got the game for $20 or I wouldn't have bought it either.