on one hand you have episodes from liberty city (tbogt being my favorite) as an example of great dlc, then you have any cod 15 dollars for three maps witch is less gooder.

They need to stop trickling out tiny DLC add-ons, like with some games you get a new costume for 3/24 the characters each month over the span of 8 months. That's annoying.

DLC need to look like a big package deal so it feels like an event, instead of a nickel and dime experience.

I kind of lost patience with DLC, especially when those extras come packed in disk with Game-of the-year releases. I'd much rather wait for those if I know they are coming.

If DLC was killing gaming, then why do so many people buy DLC?

I rarely buy DLC for some of my games, heck I watch my friend buy the DLC for Fable 3 and it only took us about 8mins to finish it. After that that we both think it was a waste of money.

Yes when abused specially when it comes to EA and Activision. I paid $60 for my copy of Hot Pursuit and so far they released about $40 worth of DLC. Now that is complete bullsh!t and i hate when people act like it's ok because its their favourate game.

Call of duty is the perfect example of that. Over priced map packs but hey it's COD so why not, right?

Killzone 3 is the other they released a Map pack DLC like a week after launch.

Gaming needs some sort of governing body that protects us the gamers from the mercy of greedy devs and publishers. Maybe allow devs say 2 dlc per title and cap them off at $8 each.

Capcom is the worst for DLC

They basicaly made people buy the beginning and ending of Dead Rising 2

Get a job, or don't buy DLC.

I've played plenty of games without DLC and most of the time the only reason I buy DLC is if I really like the game. Just because you don't get a special hat that they saved for DLC isn't going to ruin the experience... and if it does the game was bad to begin with.

Only when Activision discuss it in depth before the game is released...

I don't like it, but it isn't killing gaming, which, to me, looks stronger than ever.
DS, Wii, 360, PS3, PSP, PC, AppStore...
7 strong platforms for games, with 5 of those dedicated almost completely to gaming.
Has there been a time with more choice for gamers?
Don't look dead or dying to me.

when a game is packed with dlc from release i buy the game used later on and see what happens with the dlc. i hate when i buy a game for 60$ pop it in and im running around killing things and then i get to some npc or something that opens up playstation store for me to buy dlc to continue. no thanks, ill have to pass

It's not if DLC is killing gaming or not, it's how it's being used that ruins it. You got big pubs not giving devs the chance to FULLY FINISH developing a game, and then they end up announcing the rest of the unfinished content as day 1 DLC (CRAPCOM being biggest offender with MvC3).
2K games did that a few days after Bioshock 2 release with Sinclair solutions test pack. The data was already on the disk though, was probrably unfinished. Sega even did that day 1 DLC crap with AVP.

Paid DLC is making the gaming industry stronger, but at the same time its destroying the gaming experience for many gamers...

Selling incomplete or unfinished games its unacceptable, but the are those who are dumb and compulsive...

What happen when you unlock more features in the game with effort or in an alternative way by using cheat codes that where part in the game? All, that went straight to the toilet...

Now at days you have to pay more to get the rest of the experience...

This generation of gaming its inferior compared to previous ones I experienced...

The games now are mostly a decoration that don't last long and lack value...

I had Dragon Age 2 preordered, then canceled it when I heard one of the Dev's mention there was a pile of DLC planned. I will be waiting for the inevitable "Ultimate Edition". Especially since they dumbed the game down, and it all takes place in one city.

There are so many DLC I had that never get to use, and now I had to stop buying the DLC. wasting money, also I don't even remember which games I had the DLC for or not.. it's killing my puschase, so yeah the DLC killed it.

If it's to add a better experience or extended replay then yes I'm for it; but if it's just to "hype" or "Cut corners" because they know die hard fans of a particular series will buy it... *Grabs shotgun*

if maybe once in awhile there would be a free map or xtra game play then I would feel more like DLC adds to the experience. But most times its just a quick buck that arrives well after the game has left my radar on being played. off topic for a second, if you want really good deals on games go to a local pawn shop, then paying 10-15 bucks for dlc is balanced when you payed 10 bucks for the game. thanks for reading off to try to get into a game of homefront.

The sad part is its part of gaming....

I have to say it is part of the Xbox crowd that helped push DLC...

Remember when Quake 3 Team arena came out (pretty much an addon) where they charged almost full price for. This caused an uproar in the community. It was only when Xbox live arcade came out companies realized they can charge for low grade content.... admit it alot of the xbox fans were praising Bejeweled for god sake, which was played on PC for the longest time for free...

Nowa days ou see map packs charged for like 10-15 dollars when they were free on the PC envirnoment.... IM sorry but it just seems that the xbox crowd being so big allowed this... hell part of me thinks DLC purchases are provoked by having lack of content from the get go so the consumer will try and find cheap thrills when spending "little" amounts of money just to justify their console.

This is the same type of opinion I have about xboxlive.... the community has given a message to the companies i is OK to charge for something that was not charged in the past.

Just look at MS live on the PC platform.... the pc gamers know better, hence the reason why steam is doing well and MODS are free to download from the community.

Some DLC's are great they breathe new life into a game like extra maps for COD or a new misson for Assassins Creed Brotherhood. But if a DLC adds an extra character or new weapons and thats it then a DLC is pointless and not worth the price.

i thought activision was bad until i popped in fable 3..... totally disgusting and a perfect example

Sometimes yes, some developers hold back stuff that SHOULD be on the game already when you buy it, but instead they put it on PSN Store/Live store/Steam for 5-15 fucking bucks

but even some of those ripoff garbage DLCs bring some people enjoyment and hours of extra game time.

I prefer the high quality add ons for SP games that I have. ME2 DLC is an example of the type of DLC that I will buy anytime available.

I think that DLC is getting kinda Oouta control, but there are devs that can put out some great DLC that extends the life of my favorite games.

I think that fighting games announcing DLC characters before the game comes out is an example of REALLY LAME DLC tho. I think Devs should wait till their game is out to start making and talking about the DLC atleast.

if it adds a large amount of quality game content at low prices its a good deal. If its stuff like the horse saddle in oblivion for $5 it will ruin gaming. Crappy DLC will ruin gaming. The add on content should never be over $5. $10 just seems like to much to add on anything to a $60 game.

Only DLC that should have been in since day one.

It has hurt the PC Mods. Before DLC a number of devs put out mod tools. Now the PC community only has a handful of devs putting out mod tools. DLC has hurt the games community life cycle.

im pretty sure dragon age 2 answered that

dlc should come with a 30 day money back guarantee,

i like some dlc but the vast majority is a scam, actually anything coming from ea / capcom

the cod maps come out, well after the game is out so i dont have a problem with that, will i pay 15 euro for a couple of maps, "no" but ill pick them up if they ever go on sale, the 10 maps what i got for mw2 i hate 8/10 of the maps and the two i like are both from cod4, i only play headquarters, it wont even let me delete those maps i hate,

Developers have to come up with something, Gamesnot and other glorified pawnshops are killing gamemakers. I can understand wanting to make sure you are getting your money's worth so wait and research reviews. Watch gameplay clips.
If gamemakers were able to get there money back, they could put more into the game so that it is a worthwhile experience. That extra $5 dollars you saved buying used is bulls**t. In the long run your not saving any money. Developers have to find a way to support themselves because USED GAMES DON'T. If Devs made money they maybe could even sell the games for less because people would be supporting them. Not supporting some corporate bitch like Gamesnot's president Tony Bartel. These people only care about one thing, their money. Not games, not developers, and not you. I know I've worked at one. Great people worked there and customers were great too but everyone is treated like expendable crap.

Support game developers and buy new, just be sure you know what your buying.

Some DLC like Rock Band is worth it but even they are getting into the re-hash mode by bringing legacy songs that you can re-pay for with the new engine upgrades. I almost have a hard time buying retail right from the get go, because I know in a few months there will be a game of the year edition with all the dlc and a lower price tag