Linear.
A word recently associated with games that are supposedly limited in scope, linear seems to be the target word for reviewers that want to paint games in a negative fashion. With the increasing number of multi-choice, open world games hitting the market, linear games have been blasted as limited and unimaginative in design. While there are some games that reinforce this sort of negativism towards linearity (I’m looking at you Call of Duty series), there’s also other games that deliver some of the best, if not the best experiences based on their linear fashion.
If Half-Life 3 ever happens, what big innovation would justify it in Gabe Newell's eyes?
Innovation doesn’t always have to be a VR game, look at one of the rumours for HL3 that someone was saying earlier last week
"Procedural generation (ie. L4D Director) and advanced AI will be pushed by HLX. "
"“The 'procedural generation' in HLX does not relate to terrain or roguelike-ish mechanics but something like the Left4Dead director made "significantly more powerful". Doors, physics props, enemies, enemy types items, NPCs of any kind will be influenced by said director"
That to me is pretty significant if it's done well, that along with better enemy AI, physics and the like are what games should be evolving more but they always choose graphics mostly. The fact that it keeps circling back to only VR is the way forward when it comes to Valve is silly in my opinion.
VR can be a choice but it shouldn't be "VR only because VR is the only innovation we have left"
Just go back to what made Half-Life 2 special: the physics.
At the time, it was groundbreaking and arguably influenced a wave of other games that started to experiment with more interactive and dynamic environments. For a while, physics-based gameplay became a trend. But if you've played any first-person shooters in the last decade, you've probably noticed that most developers have either abandoned those ideas entirely or significantly toned them down. The focus shifted away from immersive world interaction toward faster pacing, scripted set pieces, and visual spectacle.
And while you're at it, ship it with a robust modding tool. That’s another thing most developers have completely given up on. It could offer a much-needed alternative to the current AAA landscape, which feels increasingly trapped in a cycle of cinematic universes and safe, homogenized content. In a world of "Marvelized" blockbusters, a game that draws inspiration from the experimental spirit of the late 1990 and mid-2000s wouldn’t just be nostalgic,it would be genuinely fresh. Ironically, looking back might be the most forward-thinking move a studio could make right now.
Here's something innovative, finish the God damn story. Wow, a concept! Locking a series behind forced innovation is stupid, and stupidity is not innovation.
They can have the game be slightly less linear but not too open. HL2 had parts like that, then Episode 2 did it a bit more.
That and expand upon the physics & AI system and further increase the graphics over Alyx and that's pretty much all they gotta do. I hope they release a separate multiplayer part after if not immediately as well, like they did shortly after HL2 released.
1. Dynamic AI for NPC - Supporting character AI that responds to your voice in real-time. Imagine getting pinned down and then just say "Alyx, throw a smoke grenade and give me covering fire!" and then she does it after responding "OK!". How about having a conversation with Alyx?
2. FOV graphical render using NVMe SSD - A graphics rendering feature that is built-in the game engine so that your GPU and CPU only renders what player is seeing. Current graphics engine renders the world beyond the FOV because of hardware limitations in immediate rendering as you pan your camera/view. Having a graphics rendering system that renders graphics instantly and only what you're seeing allows for richer, more detailed worlds or less RAM usage.
The project codenamed HLX, which is thought to be Half-Life 3, is reportedly being widely playtested ahead of a Summer reveal and Winter release.
The second option hopefully. I haven't played Alyx VR since the VR goggles hurt my eyes.
VR as an option - Totally fine.
VR Only - No thanks
I've been a Half Life fan since the original and have waited since 2007 for a sequel, it was already a kick to the nuts to have Half Life Alyx, a game which changes the ending of Episode 2 and will clearly be required to understand the story going forward in HL3, be a VR only title so I don't want a proper, full on sequel to be VR only aswell, it would be highly unfair to the HL fans who either don't like VR, can't afford it or can't do it for whatever reason.
Luckily going off the rumours, HL3 is a more traditional game.
Sybau! Lol jk but please only the option. I’m still not buying vr today lol
It'll probably be VR exclusive with full body tracking sensors and a treadmill required to play
I wonder if the rumours are true - that it has a highly destructible environment and very reactive with hot/cold with realism placed on wind and other physics, I guess it makes sense, HL2 was very impressive at the time and it carried over into GMOD. That's what I really liked about it, everything built into the engine.
The only thing that might slightly disappoint me is if they don't upgrade the graphics more. I like that Source and Source 2 has such a clean look, I just hope they push it so it's more like Source 2.5 if they haven't budged it up to Source 3. Being (supposedly) the game to finish the original story I hope they go all out if they can while maintaining high frame rates with modern hardware.
We haven't seen the best of Source 2, yet.
No really.
Checked some threads, many features are still WiP.
It just seems so impossible that after so many years and so many false leaks and rumours this might be it.
I don't know how to feel about this the game has so much weight on it in terms of expectations now half life alyx was amazing so I think they can do it but they would be feeling the pressure
If Half-Life ends with 3, it should be a call for more series to wrap it up.
Me to I want HL 3 to be the last in the series, it will probably still use the Source 2 engine but I would guess heavily modified. Then you know Valve will release some kind of collectors edition that includes all the games, then years later more remasters 😂
Me too. At the rate valve release games, if they did HL4, it would be something like 2050 😱😱😱
It all depends on what happens in these linear environments. I want to be highly entertained, yet at the same time I want to take the environment in. A game like Uncharted or Dead Space may be linear, but its what happens in those environments that makes it work. If a developer needs a more linear path to keep the pace of the game moving then thats their choice.
However, linearity does have its problems if it isn't done very well i.e. FFXIII where you're pretty limited in where you can go (nearly a straight line) and its not til Gran Pulse where you can actually roam free. Its a genre where linearity isn't welcome.
Whilst I don't care if a game is linear or open, I often feel that in linear games there is a sense of them being too scripted.
I can't count the amount of times in Uncharted 2, Half-Life 2, FEAR, and endless other linear games where when something important was happening, I was looking the wrong way!
The difficulty is if you really want the player to see it, you take the control out of his hands (cut scene, or on-rail shooter), whilst at least in an open world some of the most memorable things can happen because you are the driving force behind it.
I just played and beat Uncharted 1 and 2 for the first time. Both games are very linear and I won't play them for the insane amount of time I have other games but they were great while they lasted.