Player Affinity says: "I started up Dragon Age 2 with a lot of excitement, considering I was a fan of the original. The plot of the first Dragon Age was unique, although simplistic at times, but the gameplay, character advancement and interesting NPCs brought it all together to make a pretty good game. I was hoping that Dragon Age 2 would take that game, improve on places where it was weak (few), wow us with exciting set pieces and present a gripping story that kept us on the edge of our seat. Instead, what we get is a complete reimagining of the series, with the gameplay radically changed for the worse, graphics that seem almost equal to the original and a story that is incredibly mediocre with some small jumps in interest that make you wish they had stopped when they were ahead with Awakenings."
Dragon Age 2 set the precedent that the series would always carry our choices over, but was it worth it?
If the choices won't matter, why bother? Bioware works so hard at giving meaningful choices but rarely if ever carrying out the impact of such choices to the end.
Immersed Gamer writes: "In order to replace the oppressive BioWare Points system, EA is making a large portion of the Mass Effect and Dragon Age DLC catalogs free for PC users.
For those of you blissfully unaware, EA and BioWare employed a payment system called BioWare Points on PC to pay for DLCs for titles like Mass Effect and Dragon Age. While PC gamers have been struggling with BioWare point’s unfair conversion rates and extremely scarce and cost-detrimental sales.
Console players have been allowed to purchase content in pieces through the appropriate Sony and Microsoft shops. For real money, and not BioWare monopoly bucks. In turn, console players missed out on some DLC content, such as Mass Effect 2 pre-order bonuses that have been repackaged into a DLC pack."
Great response to Ubisoft and their disgusting behavior. Ubisoft decide to take away DLC from people who paid for it, while EA give it for free to everyone when they realize their system sucks. Who would have thought that EA of all companies would be showing Ubisoft how it should be done (even if this is EA fixing their own mistakes as well).
What goes around comes around and I promise you, Ubisoft will see their actions blow back on them when their diminishing sales numbers and stock taking a hit downward. That's the only way a company learns when they decide to be reactive instead of proactive.
BLG writes: "There was a time that BioWare games were the biggest deal in gaming. The Canadian developer’s legacy of all-time classics is well known. Mass Effect, Knights of the Old Republic, and Baldur’s Gate are some of the biggest names in gaming.
While BioWare’s quality has fallen off lately, there’s no denying the quality of titles in their portfolio. That’s why we’re going to dive in and rank every BioWare game from worst to best. By every, I do mean every BioWare game, even the ones you completely forgot about!"
Ranked from worse to even more worse more like, they been on free fall for a fair few years now and I personally don't think any of there earlier games have aged well
Wow to think at one point in their history they made a Sonic the Hedgehog game..crazy
Anthem is crazy underrated. I really enjoyed it. ME1 is Bioware's best imo
Replies(1)
I actually put quite a bit of hours into Anthem but i dont think its underrated. It was a huge mess, server issues, gameplay issues, crashes, no endgame loop, too few different enemies, uninteresting gear. too few dungeons.
It for sure had potential and if they could have managed to keep the same gameplay of the classes but without the rest of the issues, this game could have been huge, but in the state in which it launched it was such a letdown. They partly fixed some of the issues, but it took too long. A grinding game like this needs to hook players from day 1.
I don't know what DA2 is worth, though I must say I've lost most of my interest for it and won't play this game before a long time (when it's cheap and when I've nothing else to play) but this article reminds me once more that there is something deeply flawed with videogames reviews : the scale used for the final note.
When you say "Instead, what we get is a complete reimagining of the series, with the gameplay radically changed for the worse, graphics that seem almost equal to the original and a story that is incredibly mediocre" you don't give the game a 7/10. That kind of comment clearly shows that, for this particular reviewer, the game is not good, and a 7/10 should not be the note you give to such a game