Bungie Studios has reclaimed its independence, but what does it all mean? In this interview, Content Manager Frank O'Connor tells GameDaily BIZ that negotiations began about a year ago and that the deal is "an evolution of Bungie's independent spirit." More within...
Remakes of the campaigns featured in Xbox Game Studios' Halo 2 and Halo 3 are currently in development, according to a new rumor.
That's Microsoft's gaming division for you...kill off developers making new ip while trying to capitalize off some long lost glory that has no hope of ever being what it once was thanks to recent decision making favoring unrealistic profit goals and greed. What a joke.
So much bitterness. Why be upset over something like this. Just don't buy it and stick with what you prefer.
Give it rest medman..., take a deep breath and try to not sound so invested in something no one is forcing you to read, buy, or play.
"Console war"is over, Sony won, be happy.
@thesoftware730
I'm invested in people losing their jobs and their livelihoods while Microsoft execs tout record profits for their gaming division. Not sure why you wouldn't be invested. Could be you one day. Good luck.
So what’s their solution to having multiplayer? Wait until Halo 7?
That was one of the most memorable parts of Halo..
I'm not sure spending the heavy investment in time to recreate the multiplayer here is the answer either though.
Remaking the campaigns is a great idea to bring the new players up to speed. But if the multiplayer is included in each it'll just fracture the player base of each release.
I think it might be better to turn these campaigns out quicker and have 1 multiplayer game to keep everyone in one place
Maybe having an Halo Online and just release the Combat Evolve maps. And when Halo 2 releases have those maps release. I don’t know but I would like to play a newer version of Halo multiplayer. I know times have changed, and Fortnite is all younger kids really play. But back then it was Halo and you connecting 6 Xbox’s together lol.
I agree. I think that'll segment the playerbase and once 7 comes out, players might realize it sucks and go back to the older games. Especially if 7 is live-servixe, they'll be shooting themselves in the foot on the one good leg they have to stand on.
Kinda surprised they didn't just port MCC.
Maybe more $ to by made with separate remasters
Wouldn't have that problem if it were MCC being released. Gotta wait for 7 to be disappointed with MP all over again cause if they half baked Infinite what makes people think they won't half bake the next game? MP works in past HALO games not cause of nostalgia but because it's MP that isn't concerned with the endless service approach.
There is so much cognitive dissonance over Infinite. People say they didn't like it because it was a live service. Yet if you look at what the criticisms of it were at the time it came out and when the playerbase started falling off, the primary issue people had was a lack of updates. In other words, it wasn't enough of a live service.
Which is really an encapsulation of the problem with multiplayer today. So many people think that they want to go back to the "good old days" of mid-2000s multiplayer (The first few Halos, Socom, the first few Battlefields, CS 1.6, etc), but in reality if a multiplayer game like that came out today, people would whine about the lack of content within a month of launch and go back to a live service with a grindy progression system.
Why not just port the MCC? 🤔 That was the easiest layup ever and you completely missed it
I thought the same thing, then I realized that they wouldn't include the remakes in that edition. We may get a different version of Halo MCC in the future with all of the remakes included. I just want them to include Halo 5 at some point for PC.
I wonder if Microsoft will port Reach over to Playstation I quite enjoyed that game. I played Halo 3 and it was not bad I have Halo 2 on the OG Xbox I just need some cables to hook up to my tv to play it.
A new Halo 3 mod turns the iconic Master Chief into a Pokémon % Master as functional Pokeballs come to the game.
That is very impressive to skip the article here is the direct link to the video
https://x.com/GashnorOffici...
Full animiation then a code change to make the target that comes out of the ball to be in the same class unsc not a easy thing to do.
Not every Halo game has been a banger, but the franchise still has a raft of the greatest games of all time.
Infinite is a dumpster fire and as much as I like ODST, in no universe it ranks above Halo 2. This list is trash.
Best to worst: Halo 3, Halo 2, Halo Reach, Halo CE, Halo 4, Halo ODST, Halo Infinite, Halo 5.
Seems like too many have busted their nut way too soon with the first announcment. I even seen *the Captian* talking crazzy radical sh*t in the 40gig PS3 thread, what was that Halo Sigma?.
than to dance on the corpses of MS fanboys, but yes it was a bit premature.
Still, I don't care how Bungie/MS happily spin this, the industry is going to look at it as a negative and it will be something that I believe will influence the decisions of future MS partners. It seems if you sign with MS you are giving up your creative freedom.
I'm trying very hard to see where you're comming from.
I don't think people/devs care as long as they can make money and buy games.
I don't think its PR spin theres an actual respect and pantner ship there. We don't know if MSFT's restructuring/cleaning house etc. Haters and fanboys will look at this as an negative, if anything this will give new devs hope of being the new Bungie.
I'm sure Bungie wants to be its own enity and not labled as MSFT's little B*tch and MSFT not wanting the image of depending on Bungie to pull the 360's weight this is something both parties have been talking about for ages.
MSFT never bought Bizzar Creations so they didn't lose anything there.
Could you imagine the pressures Bungie was under think about that, if they stayed it would have stripped their creativity from stress.
what to bet we see a halo on ps3
Or "Bungie said its primary focus will remain developing for Microsoft's platform."
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id...
This is Bungie going from First party developer (part of MS and operating by MS rules) to second-party developer (independent but captive, operating by their own rules but solely for 360).
No amount of wishing for Halo for PS3 will make it happen, kids.
Especially since it makes no financial or creative sense for either Bungie (who are clearly sick-n-tired of working halo for ten years) or MS.
Want Halo? Buy a 360.
Don't want it?
Then move along...nobody's going to force you.