All Channels
Popular
180°

Should Nintendo Become Strictly a Software Developer?

The obvious answer to this question is no, but it's a pretty interesting debate. Usually you hear about this from Sony and Microsoft fans who simply want to see Nintendo games on "superior" platforms. Occasionally even Nintendo fans get caught day dreaming of what Skyward Sword would be like in HD, or how much more intuitive Mario Galaxy could be with the Playstation Move and Blu-Ray tech. Lets face it, Nintendo's hardware by today's standards is generally out of date. Yes, the 3DS is still coming and will be a big hit, but it will assuredly be quickly surpassed by superior hardware from competitors by the end of 2012.

This all begs to question: Should Nintendo drop the hardware and focus on software?

Read Full Story >>
zeldainformer.com
-Alpha5538d ago (Edited 5538d ago )

Or...they can release Wii 2, which they will. Probably before MS and Sony since Sony has the hardware and MS has Kinect.

Nintendo is behind on tech compared to Sony, but they still deliver great games with their classic brands.

It's time for HD and better Motion, but I'm sure their focus is on the 3DS which is bound to be a mega-success

5538d ago Replies(1)
EYEamNUMBER15538d ago

you know what popped into my head the moment i saw this

"Why make billions when we can make millions?"
raises pinky

honestly now people have some common sense

Christopher5538d ago

Nintendo abandoning hardware would be really bad for the market, IMHO. The three major companies have done so much to force each one to truly work hard for what we have now. Bring it down to just the two and I honestly believe that the rate of innovation and progress would be reduced greatly.

StbI9905537d ago

Until there is a four one...cough cough apple and they fake approach cough cough

CarlosX3605537d ago

This is exactly what I said long time ago:

http://www.carlos360.com/?p...

So, basically, this article took words out of my mouth.

thorstein5531d ago

They are a commercial success. Why would they just go software. And even if they did, chances are they would support SONY and not MS. So the pt is moot.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5531d ago
christheredhead5538d ago

no nintendo should never drop their hardware. they just need to adapt with the times. they create great systems but are slow to change. i have always thought of their systems as being the most unique and unconventional out of the 3, even if they have a hard time staying up to date. i like what they bring to the table and i cant wait to see what they unveil in the upcoming years.

on a side note: one company that needs to get back in the hardware race is sega. dreamcast 2 please.

Shok5538d ago

If Nintendo went software only, innovation would drop to a minimum, no disrespect to Sony or M$, but let's be honest here, Nintendo has given us innovation after innovation.

MintBerryCrunch5538d ago

in terms of hardware yeah...as far as software and the games, the core gaming audience got left behind real quick imo

heroicjanitor5538d ago

Not sure how you can call adding one new feature per gen innovation. Ps3/360 do so much more than their previous versions. Not like wiimote was the first motion control system, or the 3DS' one new feature does anything but change how games look.

Shok5538d ago

That "one new feature" is huge, and apparently, they're awesome enough considering the fact that the competition later on implements Nintendo's innovation into their own systems. And you do realize that 99.9% of the things the PS3 and 360 do, they just copied what was already being done on the PC right? The PC was the first platform with achievements, for instance.

badboy8085538d ago (Edited 5538d ago )

Replace Microsoft with Nintendo then I will approve this article.

Shok5538d ago

Well actually, Microsoft doesn't make that many games for their own system anymore so.......a software-only Microsoft but pretty much make them non-existent lol.

Titanz5538d ago

Is the day that gaming dies.

badboy8085538d ago

Not really look at last gen sony ran everything. The gamecube was non exsistant.

Titanz5538d ago

But I owned a Gamecube(and it hardly had online play).

Show all comments (32)
50°

U.S. patent examiner rejects Nintendo’s summoning characters patent as obvious: non-final ruling

The rejection is non-final (and even when such rejections are labeled as “final”, the process is far from over, given that there can be, at minimum, an appeal to the Federal Circuit).

Read Full Story >>
gamesfray.com
Relientk7744d ago (Edited 44d ago )

Good, as they should! A game mechanic like that shouldn't be locked behind a patent, and Nintendo didn't invent it either.

PRIMORDUS43d ago (Edited 43d ago )

Nintendo wants to keep wasting money on bullshit lawsuits, real smart in this economy. They should put that money aside for other game projects. On the other hand, I don't care if they waste it all either, and they are screwed in the future maybe that will teach them a lesson.

40°

Nintendo Completes Share Repurchase and Sets Price for Secondary Offering

Nintendo completed its share repurchase and set its secondary offering price at 8,347 yen ahead of March 16 delivery.

Read Full Story >>
4scarrsgaming.com
60°

Nintendo Suing U.S. Government Over Tariffs

Nintendo filed a lawsuit in the United States Court of International Trade.

Nintendo of America is suing the United States government over the sweeping tariffs President Donald Trump put in place last year, according to a complaint filed Friday in the U.S. Court of International Trade and obtained by Aftermath.

Read Full Story >>
aftermath.site
Deathdeliverer69d ago

Well dayum lol. Old agent orange pissing off every industry and nation.

0hMyGandhi68d ago

The fact that you have ANY disagrees will forever baffle me. And to the (apparent) MAGA contingent that exists on this website, enjoy your 8-9 dollar gas.

AuraAbjure68d ago (Edited 68d ago )

Yes, they had better be pissed after Trump told them the way they rip off the USA is over.

EveryPlatformGamer69d ago

LOL I read this on gaff, will they refund the money back to the gamers? highly unlikely. Didn't they just raise prices and pass it onto the gamers? Only Nintendo would send out the Ninjas to the US government.

-Foxtrot69d ago

That’s what I was thinking, imagine them winning hypothetically, getting a s**t load of money back which they would have lost if they hadn’t raised their prices and it’s business as normal.

It would just mean people paid more for no reason since they got the money back anyway.

Outside_ofthe_Box68d ago (Edited 68d ago )

A lot of companies partially passed the cost to consumers instead of all of it. They would still have to at least pay that back to gamers, but we know that won't happen. What's also sad is that prices won't come back down after the initial hike caused by tariffs.

People didn't understand the full repercussions of tariffs. That alone should have cost him the presidency if people knew it was a permanent price hike for consumers

Inverno69d ago

The people should sue these companies for having to over pay cause of these tariffs.

Eonjay69d ago

Naw they should sue the government for forcing the tax to begin with. No one reasonably expects these companies to absorb the taxes. Many smaller companies tried and were shut down or faced to increase prices to try to maintain their business. The tariffs effect everyone.

Inverno67d ago

I meant it mostly as a joke cause we all know the costs of these tariffs were passed onto the consumer. But it's seems no matter how vocal we are here in the states our "representatives" don't seem to care enough to represent us. And things are about to get worse.

Killer2020UK68d ago

The companies were doing what the law required then to do, the tariffs however were illegally implemented. Usually it's criminals we punish, you seem to have different ideas 🤷‍♂️

Show all comments (18)