I thought it was supposed to be the end-all gaming peripheral when it comes to motion controls? The gaming media and Microsoft told me so!

Can us PS3 and Move owners make our own "it doesn't cut it!" complaint?
I played a few matches in the demo the other day and just like fr0sty I was sorely disappointed by the Move implementation.

I was also hoping for 1:1 controls similar to table tennis in Sports Champions, but based on the matches I played it just feels like extremely basic gesture controls, that don't do much more than pick up the general direction of the Move controller and interpreting the swing speed as either "power" or "control".

It doesn't even notice whether I'm doing a forehand or backhand swing, but just applies with it seems to find appropriate based on player position.

Hell, I didn't even need to swing the controller to serve! Just a flick of the wrist to throw up the ball and then the rest is done automatically if there's no input from the player.

I think I'll just wait for Virtua Tennis 4 and hope it does a much better job with motion control implementation.

Or maybe the game just doesn't work properly.

That Kinect is a failure in terms of precise controls.

GRANDPA PLAYS THE FIDDLE!

Who are you say who can can't comment ? The article had its point of view both users pointed out that the comments made are stupid and are untrue. The developers unlike some don't like to include junk in there games so they chose not to becuase

A. You can play a tennis game on console with out a controller end of the idea is stupid

B. Kinect dose not have hardware capability to play even if there was controller attachment was available to play the game at enjoyable rate.

Right now it's simply too early to put the ball in the court of theoretical applications. Until the day comes, the tech simply can't support much past casual and exaggerated gestures.