All Channels
Popular
220°

iPad 2 Unveiled Today, Already Obsolete

With all the great new upgrades to the design, it's already going to be a question of getting this one or waiting till September for the iPad 3. Read, and tell us why you think you'd still get an iPad 2 anyway.

Read Full Story >>
gameguidedog.com
Warprincess1165562d ago (Edited 5562d ago )

I still don't understand why people buy ipads. It just a bigger ipod/iphone. Atleast the iphone is portable.

Raendom5562d ago

What's MORE ironic is that Apple have stated they are thinking about making an iPhone Nano so that they can cater to an even wider audience with a cheaper smartphone.

It's like... Make your mind up! Is iOS better on the iPhone, iPad or iNano? IMO, it's the iPhone-- Which hasn't changed GREATLY since the advent of the AppStore. :\

Tachyon_Nova5562d ago

2 things.
Firstly I agree that iPads are a huge waste of money, but I go to University and loads of people use them for taking notes during lectures, reading online textbooks etc. Basically they are using them as they would a netbook with the advantage that it has the app store and that it's lighter and smaller than a netbook.
Secondly @ 1.1, Apple have not talked about an iPhone Nano at all, people have been speculating about it.

kneon5562d ago

Except compared to a netbook, an ipad has far less capabilities, and costs more.

sashimi5561d ago

Yeah...A buddy of mine got his for $250, that is 50% off from his University. Might be the reason why people in school are using it. but besides that i see no use for them.

trounbyfire5562d ago

LOL apple fanboys are the worse, they insist that the ipad is much more than a big iphone.

it looks the same and runs a modified ios ment for..eh iphones.

whats even funnier is jobs is their tony stark but i am pretty sure apple research and development it the true mind at apple.

it has HDMI out.. droid all ready has it
front and rear camers...really that news everything has them now
faster processor ok did you need a conference for that

ITS A JOKE but wait sony puts out top of the line products like ps3 and NGp and get hammer on price yet sony pushes the industry forward.

apple come out with an over price touch phone and acts like they invented the idea and people love them.
the mac pc which lets be honest it a computer OS they are not that different and over priced
THEIR WER internet tables with touch before apple and they have the nerve to say people are copying them.

trounbyfire5562d ago (Edited 5562d ago )

sony and some of these other companies give you all the features up front and the price may be high but you are paying for the device with features

not a social status and a device that lacks features

@Baka-akaB
eh.........what
"They repeat had nauseul that it's the same bigger . So what ? it shows and that precisely what some people wanted , deal with it"

so everyone know its the same but apple fanboys just ignore it and pretend that apple invented, the touch phone, the digital mp3 play, i tunes like store, internet tablet

sounds like they have the problems pal. apple is by far a horrible company that way over prices and then sales you the same device over again with some features that should have been in the first one

Baka-akaB5562d ago (Edited 5562d ago )

guys like you are every bit as bad .

They repeat had nauseul that it's the same bigger .
So what ? it shows and that precisely what some people wanted , deal with it .

Of course there are idiots who just follow trends and dont actually have a use for it . And so what ? its the same for many tech things

Baka-akaB5562d ago

I rest my case , you are as stubborn and seems as obnoxious .

The only difference i notice between you and them is that well you dont like the device .

thewhoopimen5562d ago (Edited 5562d ago )

I keep wondering why you reiterate ipad being just a giant iphone and then go on to praise droid tablets.... "Technically" according to you... wouldn't that make android tablets just giant android phones? So are you feigning ignorance or impartiality? Because you can't have your cake and eat it too.

As for your rant on Apple, please do read up on your history. Apple is one of the first companies to come up with the PDA in their 1992 product Apple Newton Messagepad (which is the predecessor to the smartphone/tablets). Internet tables came out closer to like 2008 (I think u are referring to Microsoft Surface). My Messagepad had handwriting recognition and you could add a modem card to surf the "web".

Apple isn't a joke. As a company they've had to live underneath the shadows of competition from the likes of IBM and more recently Microsoft to get where they are today. They've surpassed Sony as the
largest retailer of music players, and they did this all pretty legitimately.
You guys this gen are looking at Apple the hegemony, but realize this company started out from 2 college kids designing a computer in a garage to take on IBM. They were the underdog. They had their ideas stolen from under them by a so-called "buddy" Bill, and yet they've managed to get where they are today.

As CEO Steve Jobs salary is $1 a year and what money he does have comes from Stock options he he's barely touched since 1997.

trounbyfire5562d ago

I wasn't going to waste my last bubble on you but what the heck

first i was refereeing to the droid phone not the tab.
second atleast the xoom has its own OS made for a tablet
third i don't care about apple or droid devices meaning i am not a fanboy of either but i do love Oled screens.
you seemed to misunderstand. with other companies you get more day one and not some version with less basic features.

" Apple is one of the first companies to come up with the PDA"

you proved my point.
The first three commercially available tablets were GRiDPad, Freestyle, and the Poqet PC all in 1989. in 1991 the The Momenta Pentop and NCR released model 3125. this is the year apple started development the newton and in 1993 they released it. yeah apple is not a tablet pioneer.

apple business practices are wrong and you know it.
don't give me apple origns story because they all borrowed from each other doesn't the Xerox Alto bring the image of jobs seeing his first GUI and lisa was born....yeah that happened

SO YEA

kneon5562d ago

I had tablet computers running windows 3.1, that was quite a while a go. And even so they still had more capabilities than todays ipad. It was slower of course but they could do more. No you couldn't browse the web, but that's because there was no web to browse.

As for the Newton, the Psion came out 10 years before and did pretty well, unlike the Newton.

thewhoopimen5562d ago (Edited 5562d ago )

@trounbyfire
I really have to wonder how old you are to think that throwing wiki solutions at me is going to win you some argument.

I'm sorry but looking at brand new concept and coming up with a usable commercial solution vs. borrowing and reverse engineering code are two completely different spectrums of your simplistic definition of "copying."

Have you ever looked at the Xerox Parc file system? It is not an OS in any sense of the letter. Its a concept of icons, menus, and windows, and checkboxes with a mouse. That is no more than looking at a set of batteries, wheels, and motor, and being told its a car. If that is considered copying then god help us because tablets must have been copied from a chalkboard with the chalk as a stylus and the slate as a touchscreen. The proof is also in the pudding. Xerox never sued Apple for breach of patents or intellectual property. If a company was making "millions" off your idea, wouldn't you? The fact is, the filesystem was never a GUI system OS.

Before you shoot back with your nonsense, why not take a look as I mentioned of the multitude of books about Apple/Microsoft. Did you know that Microsoft borrowed one of Apple's prototypes to "supposedly" help with the design for Microsoft Word? No, obviously not.

You prefer to mire in some delusional world where Apple somehow copied Freestyle, Poquet, and the GridPad. If you took the time to actually look at each of these individual products which are freely available online, you would have noticed only the Gridpad had some sort of semblance of handwriting recognition / tablet form, but it was Palm quality at best.
http://vimeo.com/3467513

Contrast this with: http://www.youtube.com/watc...
And we see Apple coming up with their own unique solution to a tablet system. How do I know this? because of input placement being different, gesture usage w/ the stylus being unique to each platform, etc.

I might be rude enough to also point out Apple being the only one out of all these early pioneers to still be around and actually making success out of a challenging idea-to-market product.. nearly 20 years later.

Contrast that with what we see today with both smartphones and tablets and I think it's pretty safe to make note that almost all manufacturers of androids, blackberries, and symbians or whatever follow Apple's same form factor, same basic desktop interface, with the gestural movements (swiping, pinching, etc.) being like for like. You can delusionally call that convergence, but I call "that" copying.

Oh by the way being number 4-5 out of a group of companies to come "up" with a PDA product does not make Apple a "copier".
Literally stealing code however... is... and Microsoft has shown PLENTY of that over the years.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5562d ago
gameguidedog5562d ago

I like to buy all kinds of products i'll never use so I can fill my glass case with nostalgic technology items that can never be touched by human hands.

DJMarty5562d ago

Without 'Flash' support, iPad 2 is DOA.

There are miles better tablets on the market that will wipe the floor with this on price, features.

Tablets are pointless

Active Reload5562d ago (Edited 5562d ago )

Who in their right mind would agree with you? DOA? Really? Did you just say that?

"Sound familiar?"

Actually, no, any examples?

Tachyon_Nova5562d ago

Yeah, no Apple product will ever be DOA simply because apple fans are so dumb that they get caught up in the hype.

Sound familiar?

kneon5562d ago (Edited 5562d ago )

Tablet aren't pointless, but their limited capabilities don't justify the ridiculous price. Based on what it can do an ipad (and similar devices) should be no more than $200.

Show all comments (27)
90°

Epic Games Asks Judge to Force Apple to Unblock Fortnite on iOS

The saga of the legal battle that sees Epic Games fight Apple in the attempt to bring Fortnite back to iOS has just gained another chapter.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
PapaBop370d ago

Damn, I'm going to need to restock my popcorn if this keeps up.

90°

Epic: Mobile Gaming Business "Largely Broken," Says "Dysfunction" Due to 30% Tax From Apple, Google

Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney notes that the mobile gaming industry is "largely broken," and blames the 30% tax levied by Apple and Google.

Christopher643d ago

Man has been saying this for ages and knows full well the only thing he wants is more money at Apple and Google's expense and absolutely none of this will result in lower prices for the consumer.

Tacoboto643d ago

He expects the digital equivalent of opening up his own store inside of a Walmart or Target. It's absurd.

And he feels absolutely entitled to it, in a too-big-to-fail sense - because Unreal Engine is used by so many developers, banning Epic would hurt those developers relying on their tech, which would be super unfair to the developers.

Notellin643d ago

Thank goodness you are there to defend the small guys Google and Apple. You're so brave, Christopher!

Christopher642d ago

Yeah, I'm totally defending Apple and Google and not explaining how another company is just as greedy. That's the big takeaway from my comment, Apple and Google good, only Epic bad. Yup. I totally didn't make it about the fact that this man just wants more money and isn't doing it for the consumers. Nope. Not that at all. I'm just praising up Big Tech. They're my one and only love in life. Please recognize me Big Tech Senpai!

VersusDMC643d ago

The epic games store charges a 12% tax and has been losing money for 5 years...that sounds dysfunctional.

gerbintosh643d ago

They are only losing money because Steam has a stranglehold on the market.

Christopher642d ago

It's a play to attempt to win over the market so they can then realign pricing with what Steam has in the long run. The problem is they are doing only that and not actually building a better software supported platform on PC. Essentially, they're throwing money at the problem, not actually trying to compete by providing better service.

110°

Epic Says They Spent $1B in Fight Against Apple & Google, "Small Price to Pay" for Freedom of Market

Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney revealed that they have spent $1 billion fighting Apple and Google but adds it's a "smam price" to pay for freedom.

BeHunted646d ago (Edited 646d ago )

Fortnite on the Google Play Store would've generated over $1 billion in percentage fees for Google. Smart move.

1nsomniac646d ago (Edited 646d ago )

I buy most my pc games through epic now. Don’t get me wrong I love steam and steam has had a lot of my money for the work they put into the platform. But i like what Epic are fighting for and they’ve been open about it from the very beginning. I wish they would sort out their verify/repair files option for when you format your drives. The whole rename/redownload hack is an absolutely awful archaic solution.

Tacoboto646d ago

They've been open about how they so openly violate the terms of the platforms they distribute on.

They spent over a billion on legal battles, and also had significant layoffs. Maybe they should cater to their employees first before forcing governments to add more regulations for industries governments just do not understand. The EU DMA - Apple's policies and lawyers have made a mockery of it every step of the way.

And back when they openly and proudly violated Apple's policies, they tried using Fortnite to coerce its players (including children) to rally against Apple's 30% fee.

Which is the same 30% fee console makers apply, but Epic has no problem with that! Epic isn't fighting for you, they're fighting for themselves and don't mind siphoning the money they get from Unreal, even if it results in layoffs.

1nsomniac646d ago

First of all you’re wrong, but second of all you clearly don’t know an awful lot about what you’re talking about.

Tacoboto646d ago

Epic proudly violated Apple's terms by introducing their own payment option in Fortnite. Fact. That's literally what started this. Epic then went on to put banners in Fortnite as a not-so-subtle call-to-arms against Apple.
Epic also violated console terms by enabling cross-platform play in Fortnite. Fact.
Epic cut 800 jobs a year ago. Fact.

Epic sucks, their engine is too big for them to fail and they know it, so they're using that to subsidize their legal battles against Apple and their attempts to rally international governments into creating regulations based on what *they* want.

phoenixwing646d ago

Epics launcher is a piece of crap compared to steams. In fact every launcher so far is crap compared to it. The only reason epic has any traction is they literally give away games in order to drive a user base.

anast646d ago

They have some good semi-giveaways.

KwietStorm_BLM646d ago

They'll make that back in a fortnight.