410°

Does Your PC Meet Crysis 2′s System Requirements?

DERKADER|5486d ago |Rumor|153|

Crysis was (and still is) notorious for needing a pretty high-spec system to run well, but Crytek has said time and time again that the engine powering Crysis 2, CryEngine 3, is far more robust, and therefore won’t require the same kind of horsepower to run well. You know where this is going. VR-Zone claims to have the game’s recommended system requirements, and they are as Crytek claimed: not too crazy.

PC crunchgear.com

Read Full Story >>

crunchgear.com

- Comments (153)

Expand all

Kran5486d ago

God no.

My PC can barely take Minecraft. My laptop sucks :(

Reply Agree 24 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Dramscus5486d ago

My motherboard is lacking slots for a video card :(
I ps3 game and can manage minecraft though.

Reply Agree 9 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Kran5486d ago

I just realised. "My PC can barely take Minecraft. My laptop sucks." I promise its a Laptop, not a desktop ;D

Agree 6 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Perjoss5485d ago

I remember when the first Crysis came out, my computer would crash just trying to view screenshots of Crysis, now I'm ok though :)

Agree 7 Disagree 1

SPAM Inappropriate

captain-obvious5485d ago

here i have a web site the test your computer at basically tells you if it can run the game or not
http://www.systemrequiremen...

Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

FrankenLife5485d ago

Why yes, My PC is up to spec and will be able to run Crysis 2 on max settings. Thank You for your concern.

Agree 6 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

nveenio5485d ago

Yup.

Agree 2 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Computersaysno5485d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

I beat the highly recommended for 1920 x 1200 30fps although i play in 1080p. Except video memory though. 1.8Gb is a lot. Awww yeah. Cant wait now.

I think most people play in 1080p or below, so should not worry too much.

Agree 2 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

turgore5485d ago

systemrequirementslab.com is not reliable. it told my laptop that it won't be able to run lots of games (like Thief 3 or Hitman Contracts) but it ran them very well.

Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5485d ago

RXL5486d ago

bubbles..i feel your pain..

i can barely play minecraft..i have to have it so foggy i can't see two feet in front of me lol

ima get the ps3 version.

i have a month to beat killzone 3 and Dead Rising 2

Reply Agree 6 Disagree 3

SPAM Inappropriate

Legion5486d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

And this is the biggest issue with those that say the PC is better then the consoles. Most PCs today can't keep up with the specs of games.

Consoles give you the advantage of the software being created for the spec and not to suit multiple specs of PCs.

If you have a sturdy system then you have no issues (as long as you KEEEP updating it) but count yourselves in the minority when it comes to PCs.

Reply Agree 13 Disagree 20

SPAM Inappropriate

awi59515485d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

Non gaming pc's cant keep up.
http://www.newegg.com/Produ...

http://www.newegg.com/Produ...

http://cgi.ebay.com/Sapphir...

http://www.newegg.com/Produ...

Now your pc meets crysis 2 requirements thats 509 dollars with crossfire performance. Less than what ps3 cost when it came out.
And i can confirm one 4870x2 runs crysis 2 at 30 fps at 1920x1080 on hardcore settings. The final buid will run way better. And if you sacrifice you Pc to the gaming GODS you can pay far less with you old pc parts.

Agree 6 Disagree 7

SPAM Inappropriate

distorted_reality5485d ago

@ Legion - you're very, very wrong. 5 years ago that may of been the case - but these days the majority of devs aren't pushing PC hardware at all, and a decent 5 year old system can run just about any new game out there.

As far as Crysis 2, the recommended requirements are fairly decent, with older hardware still viable, it won't be anywhere near the resource hog that the original game was.

Agree 12 Disagree 2

SPAM Inappropriate

ATiElite5485d ago

You want a high performance vehicle you buy quality parts.
You want a high performance body you buy healthy food.
you want high fashion you buy the clothes.
you want a high performance PC you gotta buy the parts that will keep you ahead of the curve.

Thinking your gonna play a game exactly how a developer made it on a used PC you got from a fire sale ain't gonna cut it.

Agree 6 Disagree 2

SPAM Inappropriate

somerandomdude5485d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

The Minimum specs are actually quite average. Core duo processors are pretty much the standard in current pcs and 2Ghz is a minimum speed you'd want to start out at.

The graphics card requirements aren't that high either, hd4000 series is the same card that came out during the beginning of the PS3 360 era and the requirements are a hd3000 series.

If your pc can't handle this game then you either got ripped off, you haven't upgraded in about 5 years or have a office pc, meaning you'd still have a ps2 in console terms.

Agree 6 Disagree 1

SPAM Inappropriate

somerandomdude5485d ago

"If you have a sturdy system then you have no issues (as long as you KEEEP updating it) but count yourselves in the minority when it comes to PCs."

You only need to update as much as new consoles come out spending the same amount of money. It's not like we can still use our ps1's for current games.

Agree 1 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Legion5485d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

Sorry to all those PC fanboys. But the minimum specs is pushing out 20 fps. (sad) And once again... the MAJORITY of PCs owned do not meet the specs.

And why is the highly recommended specs only pushing out 30 fps? What happened to PCs pushing out those 60 fps??

Average 5 year system of a console (and that is minimum... closer to 7 year) I have spent way over a thousand dollars on each of my PCs keeping them up to date. And I still don't play games on them. (primarily graphics work and production) But I need to keep them up to date so that I can create games and media.

So you really miss the point that PCs are out there but even that $509 system that you buy today is not going to be ideal for the life of a console without updating the PC to meet specs each year. Just not going to happen... no matter what you might think.

Agree 4 Disagree 7

SPAM Inappropriate

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5485d ago

JsonHenry5485d ago

This time around, Crysis, I am ready for you.

Reply Agree 9 Disagree 2

SPAM Inappropriate

distorted_reality5485d ago

As am I.

Phenom hexacore, 8 gig ddr3 and dual 6870s. Am just hoping that multicore and crossfire support is decent, otherwise I may be screwed lol.

Agree 6 Disagree 1

SPAM Inappropriate

Julie5485d ago

Me too i believe, i7 920, Ati 5970, 6gb DDR3 triple channel.

But then again i am sure that somehow i won't be able to play at max :3

Agree 2 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

awi59515485d ago

@Legion
I was just making the cheapest gpu you find right now for 150 dollars. And Crysis doesnt like ATI cards find you a good nivida card and crysis 2 will probally run at 60 fps no prob You could have built that pc i recommended 3 years ago and still be fine. No game created in 3 years never pushed that system much.

Like someone else said games rarely use the full performance of cards that come out. That old build maxes any game out even today. And you can buy a 3rd graphics card to boost its power more for 69 bucks because the card is old for a 3gpu set up. If you want to play at 60 fps that much and at higher res than 1080 p just pay 100 dollars more for a new direct x 11 card. That wont get pushed at all for several years to come.

Agree 2 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

JsonHenry5485d ago

Crysis doesn't like ATi (AMD) cards? My 5870 can run the original Crysis maxed.

I think you are confusing in game Nvidia sponsorship with real world results my friend.

Proof? - http://hardocp.com/article/...

Agree 2 Disagree 2

SPAM Inappropriate

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5485d ago

ATiElite5485d ago

Ah yes those were the days when Crysis would turn ALL PC's to nothing more than a slide show device if you were lucky enough to make it that far. Crysis kicked off an arms race not seen since the Cold War!!

CryEngine 3 is far more optimized and uses the smart programming of DX11 unlike DX10 which was DX9 with a bunch of crap tossed on it.

Forged By Chaos uses the CryEngine 3 and it looks AWESOME!! can't wait to see Crysis 2 Pc in DX11 mode.

Reply Agree 6 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

rainbow6bet5485d ago

@JsonHenry

awi5951 isnt wrong at the time of crysis launch nividia cards run better and still do with that game. If you take a nividia card with the same power as the card you currently have the nividia card will beat it everytime. Nivida pays developers to make their games run better on their cards. Check the performace charts on Tom's Hardware. The nividia cards always run better on that game because nividia pays them to do so.

Agree 1 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

ATiElite5485d ago

That's not always true.

AMD and Nvidia cherry pick what screen resolution they wanna perform better at and also it really depends on if the game has AA on and all special effects.

Many benchmarks are not reliable. I only look at benchmarks from Hardware Canucks because they ALWAYS use MAX Graphics, all special effects on and they use 8xAA 16 AF across the 4 main resolutions thus giving a true ideal of a cards performance.

Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

ugabugaz5485d ago

Yeah, I can do the recommended settings.

Reply Agree 2 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Qdog5485d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

If I cant max it with my rig then something is very wrong. The only thing I should have performance problems with is running it maxed in eyefinity (5760x1080)

eVGA e762 mobo
i7 980X (4.6ghz)w/ HT
12gb DDR3
2x HD5970s (1ghz core/1.25ghz mem)
+ PNY XLR8 GTX 460 (1gb) for Hybrid PhysX

Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

deadoralive13375485d ago

I am sorta between recommended and highly recommended. Does anyone know if GTX 460 and a 3.2 quad core is good enough for this?

Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Computersaysno5485d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

GTX460 will do well in this :-)

Better if you overclock it. Its faster than both 4870 and GTX280. 1Gb version wins comfortably against GTX280 in crysis/warhead. Shouldn't be too much of a stretch to imagine it'll win in this too.

Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5485d ago

Motorola5486d ago

HD4870? Wow time is almost catching up to my card... Btw is 1650x1050 performance similar to 1600x900? I would think so but I am not sure.

Reply Agree 3 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

callahan095485d ago

1680 x 1050 is a common 16:10 resolution. I assume that's what you meant, because I've never heard of 1650 x 1050. It's exactly the same as 1600 x 900 in terms of the quality of the image, it's just that it's optimized for 16:10 monitors instead of 16:9 monitors. Which means it's slightly less *wide*.

Reply Agree 6 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Motorola5485d ago

thanks

Agree 1 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

callahan095485d ago

No problem!

Agree 2 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

awiseman5486d ago

Lol

Reply Agree 6 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Sarevok5486d ago

hell no...I lag like crazy when I play Doom 3.

Reply Agree 5 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Shackdaddy8365486d ago (Edited 5486d ago )

Yes :)

And I'm about to upgrade to a second 5870 in crossfire so my computer should run Crysis 2 full settings w/o even trying.

Reply Agree 6 Disagree 2

SPAM Inappropriate

callahan095485d ago

I was thinking of doing the same, then I realized my motherboard only has a single 16x PCI-E slot, so I'd have to get a new motherboard in order to do that. Screw that...

Reply Agree 4 Disagree 3

SPAM Inappropriate

awi59515485d ago

just buy a dual card ati and nividia has them

Agree 4 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Shackdaddy8365485d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

Well, he might not have room in his case for dual card...

I know I would have to cut into my case if I got anything larger than 10.5". In fact, I had to kinda slip my card into an empty hard drive bay in order to fit it because a 5870 is 10.75" if you include the fan things that stick out. Luckily it BARELY fit....

Agree 1 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

callahan095485d ago

I appreciate your defense Shackdaddy836, but the truth is my case could fit one of the dual-cards. But I'm not ready to go that route because I just got my 5870 last year. I'm not about to replace it all-together, I was just considering getting another to complement it.

Agree 1 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

stuntman_mike5485d ago

I got a 5870 great card. I think i just meet the high spec

Reply Agree 3 Disagree 1

SPAM Inappropriate

Shackdaddy8365485d ago

Ya, you will definitely be able to run on full settings with just 1 5870. I'm just getting 2 cus I have some extra money from a previous buy that I waaay over-estimated on XD.

Agree 1 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

jay25486d ago

Yeah :).

Reply Agree 5 Disagree 1

SPAM Inappropriate

Neo Nugget5486d ago

This is when consoles come in handy.

Reply Agree 5 Disagree 19

SPAM Inappropriate

plb5486d ago (Edited 5486d ago )

Yeah it will play but will look no where as good. Bfbc2 on medium settings on PC looks 10x better than console..I have both versions.

Reply Agree 24 Disagree 2

SPAM Inappropriate

ProjectVulcan5486d ago (Edited 5486d ago )

Naw.....anything from a Geforce 8800 up will tear the consoles a new one and beat them upside the head with their own hard drives.

Old cards like that infest ebay, can be had for next to nothing. Cram one in your average PC box et voila, console beater

Reply Agree 23 Disagree 7

SPAM Inappropriate

BloodyNapkin5486d ago (Edited 5486d ago )

Actually your are full of sh1t. I am sitting here with a 9200 and 4 gig ram, dual core intel,this is my laptop a asus g50v. And my desktop has 6 gig ram and ati 4200hd, neither will run the original crysis worth a sh1t. And i can not run anything that looks or plays better than killzone 3.

Agree 9 Disagree 22

SPAM Inappropriate

ProjectVulcan5486d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

Naw, you just dont know anything about graphics. When i said 8800 up, i meant faster, not a higher number. So you know nothing.

Higher overall numbers dont count for a lot in the world of graphics. What you have is a very, very low end integrated 9 series processor. You have crappy integrated processors. Hence the two after the nine. Whereas 88 meant that the 8 series i referred to was a previous generation, but a top end previous generation chip signified by the second number, the 8.

No bottom end integrated chip gets anywhere near performance of an immediately previous gen high end chip. Thats how the industry works.

No 7200, 7300, 7500 got near a 6800.

No 8200, 8300, 8400 got near a 7900.

No 9300, 9400, 9500 gets near an 8800. etc etc

Agree 22 Disagree 8

SPAM Inappropriate

STONEY45486d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

No, you obviously know nothing about graphics cards, the 4200 is FAR worse than the 8800s. Bigger numbers don't always mean better. 4800s are the gamer range of the 4000 series. The 4200 on a laptop is essentially an integrated card.

Edit - I was beaten to it by a minute =(

"Thats not what you said though, you said anything geforce 8800 and up would beat consoles hand down. Which is actually false and he called you on it and now you are trying to save your @ss."

Gawd, the ignorance. A 4200 is below a 3870. A 5350 is below a 4850. A 250GTS is below a 9800GT, despite being from a newer series. Hell, the 6870 is worse than the 5850.

The first number has to do with the architecture, and the rest with how high-end it is. Obviously, since you know so much, you should know this.

The minimum here is the 8800. A 9300 won't run it. By your logic, Crytek are liars and know nothing.

Agree 10 Disagree 7

SPAM Inappropriate

Tarasque5485d ago

Thats not what you said though, you said anything geforce 8800 and up would beat consoles hand down. Which is actually false and he called you on it and now you are trying to save your @ss.

Agree 7 Disagree 11

SPAM Inappropriate

BloodyNapkin5485d ago

I know more about computers or video cards than either one of you guys. He said any Geforce 8800 series card and up would beat a console to death. Which is actually false cause your low end mx cards and such run like crap in each series, but that is not what he said.

Agree 5 Disagree 11

SPAM Inappropriate

ProjectVulcan5485d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

Yes tarasque, AND UP. Faster. I thought it was obvious that is what i meant. I figured there was not anyone stupid enough to dispute that i meant faster or better.

Clearly i was wrong about that and there are people out there still dumb enough and ignorant enough about graphics that literally took my statement as meaning higher number, even though i didn't say that.

Next time i guess i will have to phrase my replies for morons who take everything that is said literally because they know nothing about the subject in hand. Thanks for that.

Maybe if i had specifically said up from this number to a higher number then you would have an argument. But i didn't. I meant up as in performance, or up as in speed. FFS, the dumbos on here.

Show me the bit where i said and up every number from this number? Well? Specifically i said up from this number to a higher number? God, there are some bloody idiots on here.

Agree 14 Disagree 4

SPAM Inappropriate

LazyDevs5485d ago

Lol, Vulcan just got owned. You said geforce 8800 and up and that includes all releases even if it is a crappy 8800mx that runs crappy.

Agree 5 Disagree 16

SPAM Inappropriate

2Spock5485d ago

Lol your a dumb f#$k vulcan

Don't call people dumb when you make a mistake and look like a retard that doesnt know what f$%k he is talking about. Your quote was "anything from a Geforce 8800". So that mean anything above a geforce 8800, that includes the geforc 9200 he said he had. Doesnt matter you said anything above a 8800 and that includes his 4200hd.

F#$king Morons i swear.......

Agree 3 Disagree 14

SPAM Inappropriate

Computersaysno5485d ago

He obviously meant faster. Only retards saw him write a higher number. Up does not actually say higher does it. Up could mean anything and he obviously has enough knowledge to know what he meant and that was more performance that an 8800, not more numbers.

Have to be a mug to argue over the precise meaning of the person who knew what they were talking about especially after it was clarified.

Agree 7 Disagree 5

SPAM Inappropriate

ProjectVulcan5485d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

@2spock, im dumb? It is you're. Not your. Duuhhhh.

How is using the word up to indicate better performance a mistake?

Why are you telling me what i meant when i know what i meant clearly and what my use of the word up was in MY statement?

Why are you arguing when i clarified EXACTLY what i meant by the use of the word up in my very next statement before the idiots even came out and claimed i was incorrect? I even explained the numbering system of the industry to help clarify my statement, this was still BEFORE the idiots rolled out. It was already done and dusted and clarified before it kicked off.

Why are you claiming that i meant all higher numbers when that was neither what i said specifically, nor what i clearly meant? Only a complete know nothing would even assume that i meant all numbers. Anyone with the slightest bit of knowledge would realise i meant better performance.

Anyone that disputes what MY intended meaning of the word up was in MY statement is a complete and utter tw@ :-)

Fuck me, numbnuts just infest this site don't they?

Agree 18 Disagree 2

SPAM Inappropriate

Utalkin2me5485d ago

He didnt say faster he said "anything up from a geforce 8800 up". He means what he says. Dont have a clue of what your are talking about then keep your mouth shut. he should of said anything that performs better than a 8800. But that wasnt what he said and he got burned on it plain and simple, lets move on.

Agree 5 Disagree 4

SPAM Inappropriate

BloodyNapkin5485d ago

Anything up from a 8800x series card is a 9X series card and so on and so forth. So a 9x mtx series card will not perfom near as good as a 8800 ultra. But vulcan says "anything" above 8800, just your'e lack of computer knowledge is all.

Agree 0 Disagree 11

SPAM Inappropriate

ProjectVulcan5485d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

Sighs. CONTEXT people.

Why is this so hard for you to understand? With my second statement before anyone else butted in, i made it VERY CLEAR EVEN FOR STUPID PEOPLE that when i said 'up', i meant performance. Not overall higher numbers. My explanation of the industry numbering system (in that example Nvidia's Geforce) should make this frickin obvious to even the most stupid of readers.

"When i said 8800 up, i meant faster, not a higher number" Was my IMMEDIATE response, second reply. That wasn't clear enough for the mugs out there?

You are putting words into my mouth and changing the intention and meaning of my words by claiming that the word 'up' means every higher number. Clearly from my first and second post, this is not what i meant.

If you still cannot understand the simple subtleties of the english language where context is important, i suggest you try another language.

Agree 12 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Dude4205485d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

To the people trying to beat down vulcan, try to have some common sense. If anything, you're in the minority of interpreting what he meant. I know exactly what he meant, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure it out.

The majority of PC gamers have associated this term "8800 and up" with faster video cards, aka, gaming series video cards.

The fact that you guys are trying to explain why he got owned in the argument, makes it seem like common sense is non-existent. Either that or you're really trying to be a bunch of smartasses.

Agree 12 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Computersaysno5485d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

Agrees Dude420 tis obvious to me what he meant. Anyone that knows about hardware would have read it and not even thought about higher numbers, just better cards than the 8800.

I guess i should say faster, not better. What with all the pedantic smartasses around. Maybe they would think when i said better i meant a bigger number....because they have no common sense.

Also while we are taking everything vulcan said precisely literally i honestly want to know where we can see a PC beat a console up with the console's hard drive. Cos thats not just a simple turn of phrase either?

Agree 6 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Cataclism05485d ago

Its sad.

Kinda sad that people don't know that higher numbers don't necessarily mean higher performance.

Pretty sad that they can't use context clues.

Nothing short of pathetic that they have to look for a loop hole in what vulcan said, then insult him because they know what he said is true and can't admit it.

Agree 3 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Ducky5485d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

I find it amusing how some people are so quick to jump on the 8800 thing when instead of exposing vulcan, they're actually just exposing their own ignorance.

'Anything from XXXX up ...' is a common expression which is based on performance hierarchy.
It would be pants-on-head retarded to assume it means the actual number since the next-generation will typically have a higher model number but would contain low-profile cards as well.

Then again, the numbering system has already been explained in detail and was still followed by asinine comments. Oh well.

Agree 4 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

evrfighter5485d ago

"Actually your are full of sh1t. I am sitting here with a 9200"

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

comments like this is why you think pc gamers are elitists. It's not that we are it's just console kids are just freakishly stupid.

Agree 6 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

+ Show (15) more repliesLast reply 5485d ago

STONEY45486d ago

If you have a half-decent gaming PC, there's almost no reason for looking at the requirements anyways except for curiosity. Consoles don't come in handy anywhere here. Anything above the nearly 5 year old 8800GTX plays modern games perfectly fine still. That's pretty much the average console cycle length.

Reply Agree 5 Disagree 3

SPAM Inappropriate

plb5486d ago (Edited 5486d ago )

Core i5, 4gb ram, nvidia 360m w/ 1gb ram. Should play fine but not at max and no dx11. 2 days until PC beta so I will see.

Reply Agree 6 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Bounkass5486d ago

Yes.

Reply Agree 2 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

StarScream4Ever5486d ago

Core i5 2.8ghz, 4 GB, AMD 5770. Should be enough for medium settings. :)

Reply Agree 2 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

IaMs125485d ago

You should be able to nearly max it out, not all the way with AA and stuff but close. I have a similar setup: 2.9 X4 Athlon, 4 GB, 5770 and nearly maxed Crysis 1 with 1080p, not every setting was turned up to enthusiast, but most were. So I would expect similar or better results from Crysis 2 :)

Reply Agree 2 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Kon5486d ago

AMD Phenom II 3.01 GHz, 4GB, AMD 5670 . Can someone tell me if it will run? Sorry, i'm no expert

Reply Agree 5 Disagree 1

SPAM Inappropriate

Raptura5486d ago

Should run quite well, but obviously not at max settings.

Reply Agree 6 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

mistajeff5486d ago

you should be good. i don't know AMD that well but it seems like you're a little above the "recommended" category

Reply Agree 5 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

kornbeaner5486d ago

Should be fine at Med settings. I would run it at 1280x720 for a stable framerate. Might be able to turn some things to high at that resolution.

Reply Agree 3 Disagree 1

SPAM Inappropriate

Kon5486d ago

thanks for the help guys, bubs for everyone.

Agree 6 Disagree 1

SPAM Inappropriate

stuntman_mike5485d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

@Kon
is your phenom 2 a quad core?

i got a AMD phenom 2 x4 965 be @3.4,RAM 4GB,XFX 5870. with custom cpu fan. im using a samsung 32 HDTV to run on and i get 1920x1080 res on that.

i should be able to get high spec or near.?

Reply Agree 1 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

peowpeow5485d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

By high do you mean highest? Because there's always high then very high. You'll reach high fine! A 5870 is still great, faster than my 6850 which maxed out crysis with playable frames @ 1920*1080 :)

This game is more optimized, and (ignoring dx11) shouldn't this mean at least similar or better performance with same visuals as C1? Hope so!

Agree 2 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5485d ago

Toman855486d ago (Edited 5486d ago )

My rig is Geforce GTX 580, Core i7 950 3.06 GHz and 12GB RAM 1600mhz, gonna run this beast easy ;)

*Everytime I post something I get always disagree for what* :D

Reply Agree 13 Disagree 5

SPAM Inappropriate

Raptura5486d ago

someone mad n jelly at your rig

Reply Agree 11 Disagree 2

SPAM Inappropriate

kneon5486d ago (Edited 5486d ago )

I built an identical spec machine. But according to the "highly recommended" video ram I'm falling a little short. My card "only" has 1.5Gb ram.

I don't think I remember seeing any 580 cards with more ram, do they really expect me to put 2 $500 cards in just to max out their game? that's not going to happen given how dull the other crysis games were.

Reply Agree 3 Disagree 4

SPAM Inappropriate

Kazu0 Hirai5485d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

lol kneon, crysis is a dull game? obviously you don't know how to play it then. it is not only the best looking game this generation but also one of the most fun to play, diverse shooters of all time. nanosuit, sandbox style levels, i seriously doubt you have actually played the game. here, check this out and tell me its a dull game.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

PS: if you went with AMD, you could have got a 6970 which has about 90% of the 580s power for $140 less and 2GB ram

Agree 1 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

kneon5485d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

I have the maximum edition and haven't managed to finish any of the games in the box. I've tried, I've gone back to play again many times and I'm bored within 15 minutes. They just aren't very engaging.

Just watched the video, and yes it's still dull. It just so lacking in intensity. I want chaos and mayhem and hoards of relentless enemies, not picking off one or two guys at a time with the aid of my special "magic" suit. Play KZ2 visari palace on elite, that's the kind of thing I'm looking for in an FPS. KZ3 didn't match it.

Agree 0 Disagree 3

SPAM Inappropriate

stuntman_mike5485d ago

@Kneon

I agree im finding it hard to finish crysis not because its that hard but it just doesnt hold my attention for long. although the second one looks really good.

Agree 2 Disagree 2

SPAM Inappropriate

kmanmx5486d ago

i7 2600k 8gb ram and gtx470.

It runs great.

Reply Agree 2 Disagree 3

SPAM Inappropriate

Raptura5486d ago (Edited 5486d ago )

Core i7 870 2.93 GHz, Radeon HD 5850, 4 GB RAM 1333 MHz

Shouldn't be a problem ;]

Anyone know the comparison of 4870 x2 vs. 5850?

Reply Agree 1 Disagree 1

SPAM Inappropriate

mistajeff5486d ago

my pc's butt hurts just from thinking about it. i recently got a hydro cooler and cranked my i5 2.8ghz up to 4ghz, and i have a 1gb gtx460 and 4gb of ddr3. im hoping i can pull medium on dx11. though i plan on getting another 460 later this year (hopefully when the price comes down) and hooking up some SLI

Reply Agree 1 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

RGTrain5486d ago

i7 970 @ 4.3 crossfireX (2) 5970's 6gigs of 2000 ram Ill eat up Crysis 2.

Reply Agree 1 Disagree 1

SPAM Inappropriate

KillerPwned5486d ago

Thankfully i can run it a lot better then i thought.

Reply Agree 3 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

WhiteNoise5486d ago

Man the specs are brutal...gtx280 = 30 fps at 1680x1050 :o

I still don't think these specs are legit though. They never came from crytek themselves.

Keep in mind that the recommended specs for crysis was an 8800gtx...it got 30 frames on high at 1680x1050 with no AA.

Recommended specs never means 'maxed' it means barely playable maxed.

Fingers crossed it doesn't run like crap. The game looks so good though I'll be happy to run it in DX9 if I have to in order to get 60 fps.

Reply Agree 2 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Hassassin5486d ago

my laptop can, yes.

Reply Agree 1 Disagree 1

SPAM Inappropriate

Thecraft19895486d ago (Edited 5486d ago )

i7 980x quad gtx480 and 12gb ram ( did have 24gb but was just OTT ) 256gb sdd for OS and programs and 4x2tb for general sutff so yeah max settings 3x montior and 3d for me.

Reply Agree 1 Disagree 1

SPAM Inappropriate

Tachyon_Nova5486d ago (Edited 5486d ago )

Core i7 930 @ 3.3 (minor overclock), ATI 5870, 6Gb ddr3 ram @ 2006 MHz. Hoping for High graphics to be at least playable at 1920x1080

Reply Agree 2 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

callahan095485d ago

You'll easily be able to do that. You've got the same basic system as I have, only a better CPU (I have an i7 870 @ 2.80 ghz) and less RAM (I have 8 gb). So you should be getting around the same performance as me and I can run Crysis and Warhead at Ultra/Enthusiast with no problem, and Crysis 2 is supposed to be even better optimized and from what I heard Crysis 2 should run better than Crysis on the same machine.

Reply Agree 3 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Tachyon_Nova5485d ago

Yeah I can max Crysis at about 40FPS with that rig, and I can't get the 64bit version running on Windows 7 at higher than 20FPS (even on all minimum specs). Obviously there is some issue with Crysis' compatibility with Win7 64

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

MARKUS_MAX1MUS5486d ago (Edited 5486d ago )

core i7 to run it on highly recommended? really?

An overclocked sandy bridge i5 should run it on the highest settings just fine without any bother :P

If its more spec friendly than crysis 1 this website is BS, wait for an official announcement from Crytek before believing a random website, you dont know who advertises on there :)

My guess is Intel

Its hard to find an unbiased opinion from a higher source these days.

Reply Agree 5 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

hassi945485d ago

I assume since they just say 'i7' it'll be the lowest grade i7, which the i5 2X00 will be way more powerful than.

Reply Agree 2 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Too_many_games5485d ago

Intel single core 800mhz, 256mb ram and Nvidia 4500. can i run it?

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 2

SPAM Inappropriate

branchedout5485d ago

Flawlessly.

Reply Agree 3 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

CoLD FiRE5485d ago

Unfortunately, you won't be able to run it with more than 16x AA @2500x1600. /s

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Too_many_games5485d ago

what if i over clock my 800mhz to almost 1 ghz? will that work? how about getting DOUBLE the ram?

Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Xfanboy5485d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

shouldn't be a big problem!
http://www.youtube.com/watc...

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

will see how it runs on intel x3100..

I think BF3 will make my card blow apart!!

I hope!

Reply Agree 1 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

STONEY45485d ago

Lol, my card lands right on Highly Recommended, Gigabyte SOC GTX560Ti. I'll have the i5 2500K as soon as the fixed Sandy Bridge motherboards are released as well. Should be a nice upgrade from the ole i7 920.

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Letros5485d ago

2500K, GTX 570, good to go

Reply Agree 3 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Inception5485d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

Hmm, let me check my rig:
- CPU: Athlon 64 X2. check
- CPU Speed: 2.5 Gig. check
- Physical Memory: 2 GB. check
- VGA: Gforce GTX 220. check
- Video memory: 512 MB. check
- DX: 9.0c. check
- SM: 3.0. check
- OS: Windows 7. check
- Performance target: need more money to upgrade my rig and run this shit -_-

Reply Agree 6 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

stuntman_mike5485d ago

Check

Reply Agree 1 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Inception5485d ago

haha, yeah, check for the last one too.

Agree 1 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

chavafx5485d ago

i hope im good for the best options i have
cpu phenom 2 x4 965 3.4ghz
memory 4gb ddr3 1600hz
video card ati radeon hd5870 1gb dx11
windows 7 64

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

stuntman_mike5485d ago

i have exactly the same set up lol i think we be fine.

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

GrumpyVeteran5485d ago

Yeah I'll probably do alright.

Sapphire 6950

Intel i5 750 2.67 ghz OC @ 3.4ghz

4gigs ram.

win 7 64

1920x1200

Reply Agree 2 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

hassi945485d ago

Unlock that 6950 to a 6970!

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

FantasyStar5485d ago

I played the leaked beta well enough (20-40FPS), but that was DX9 and clearly a WIP. I guess we'll find out on March 1st huh?

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 1

SPAM Inappropriate

Newtype5485d ago

Cool, I can run Crysis 2:
CPU: i7 940 @ 3.62 Ghz
GPU: EVGA GTX 570
RAM: 6GB @ 1600Mhz

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

TABSF5485d ago

So how will this square up.

CPU: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T @ 3.6GHz @ 1.32Vcore
RAM: 8192MB PC2-8500 1066MHz DDR2
GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 1GB SLi @ 800MHz, 1600MHz, 4000MHz
PPU: Nvidia GeForce GT 240
Storage: 2854GB
Monitor: LG Flatron W2363D 23" Full HD 3D

Looks like I'm going to have some fun.

Also that earlier spat between Vulcan and Bloody
Sorry but Vulcan is right, everyone in the PC community when they say something like this

"Naw.....anything from a Geforce 8800 up will tear the consoles a new one"

They're referring to the type of model not the series
so when he says 8800 and up, he means: 9800, 280, 480 and 580

What Bloody is trying to say is that a 9200 is better than a 8800, which is impossible.
The 8800 GTX has 128 shaders 650MHz/ 1625MHz
The 9200M GS has 8 shaders 550MHz/ 1300MHz

Also The HD 4200 desktop does not exist its a mobility chip.

Reply Agree 2 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

innocentrebel5485d ago

I just purchased all new parts for a new build, thankfully i bought the right stuff.

i7 @ 3.06ghz
GTX 560 Ti SOC
8 gig Ram
Win 7 64-bit

I'm rocking a strange resolution, though. I play on my 65-inch HD-TV which has a resolution of 1804x1004. Heh

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

CoLD FiRE5485d ago

What's your TV's model? Because that resolution is really strange.

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

TXIDarkAvenger5485d ago

wow, my laptop can actually run it. Then again it is a gaming laptop.

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

tunaks15485d ago

ill do fine

i7 720
8 gb ram
ati 5870 - 1 gb
1920x1080

Reply Agree 1 Disagree 1

SPAM Inappropriate

TABSF5485d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

Guys do you realise that a

8800 GTX is better than: 9800 GT, GT 240, GT 340, GT 440

Enthusiast: 8800 GTX, 9800 GTX, GTX 280, GTX 480, GTX 580
High-end: 8800 GTS, 9800 GT, GTX 260 - GTX 270, GTX 460 - GTX 470, GTX 560 Ti - GTX 570
High-Mid: 8600 GS, 9600 GT, GTS 250, GTS 450, GTX 550 Ti
Low: 8400 GS, 9400 GT, GT 240, GT 310, GT 420 and GT 530

Remember this is how Nvidia would characterise them.

But here is how cards from many series are very similar
8800 GS, 9600 GSO, GT 230 v.2, GT 330, GT 430, GT 530
All these have 96 Cuda cores and the earlier ones in the list was both on the same chip just different revisions

Here is a list of the same chip different revision.
8800 GTS, 9800 GTX, 9800 GTX+, GTS 250 all these have the shame chip - G92 just the GTS 250 being 55nm not 65nm and having G92b rather than G92

Reply Agree 2 Disagree 1

SPAM Inappropriate

saint_john_paul_ii5485d ago

what happens when you sli a GTX 470, will you get that enthusiast quality on the game?

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Frenza5485d ago

Would you categorize my GTX 285 as an "Enthusiast" card then? Just a simpel question (:

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

tubers5485d ago

I hope Crysis 2 is a more GPU intensive game

(like crysis 1 as opposed to games like GTA IV that is CPU intensive [poor coding]) :)

Makes it easier for people who are budget conscious and can only afford to upgrade cards not both gpu and cpu.

namely.. me :)

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Omega Archetype5485d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

Si! Mine should.

i7 740QM (1.73Ghz)
GTX 460M 1.5GB
8GB RAM
Windows 7 64-bit
1080p

Oh yeah!

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Omega Archetype5483d ago

Just tested the demo out. Was getting 30-35 FPS @ 1080p on Gamer visual settings (there's also Hardcore and Advanced visual settings.)

Looks great on that setting too! Gameplay is pretty solid, but I'm still getting used to shooters on PC.

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Psychic_Waffle5485d ago

I wish it could.

I can hardly play flash games.

Reply Agree 3 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

ATiElite5485d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

Current build
AMD Phenom 550 X2 @ 4.2ghz
4GB DDR2 800
2 XFX Black Edition HD 5850 Crossfire
Win 7 64 & 32 Win Xp Hackintosh OSX
2 24" HP monitors

Battlefield 2 build
Intel Core i5 2500k (or LGA 2011 variant)
switching to LGA 2011 Mobo (dam P68 fault)
8 GB DDR3 1600
3 24" HP monitors
2 GTX 560 SOC ti SLI or 2 HD 6950 Crossfire or HD 6990
Win 7 64 bit Hackintosh OSX

Reply Agree 1 Disagree 1

SPAM Inappropriate

QuakeStyle5485d ago

MY PC EATS CRYSIS AND ALL THE CONSOLES OUT THERE.

Q9400 3.37 GHz. 4 gb ram 850 mhz, ati 4870x2.

Reply Agree 2 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

xtremegamerage5485d ago

Strange then isn't it, i ran the $£^$a on an old rig. Tested it out.

dual core, 2gb,1900xt.

1440x900@30+fps.DX9

ROFL.

Anyone with an 8800gt will be fine.

And guys with 5970,gtx260's, 280's. You'll be fine.

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

xtremegamerage5485d ago

I don't normally agree much with you.

But everything you said is spot on.

and guys if you want to reall check what you card has and does not have. go here. All the info you'll ever need.

www.gpureview.com/

Compare cards all day long, properly.

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Killzone3___5485d ago

no :(
but my brother have a good laptop but he don't let me play on it T_T....
i even told him i'll pay to him to play on it ( just testing him ) but he said no >.< ....

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

CoLD FiRE5485d ago

Wow, your brother is cruel. I even let my 6-month old niece screw around with my whole PC.

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Killzone3___5485d ago

no he's not :) , i always play with him and go out with him , talk wtith him but he don't like someone touch his things , he don't let me touch the laptop or even his phone(blackberry) but he let me play on his ps3 befor i bought my ps3.... he trust me but he have his own reasons , im sure he have a good reason for not letting anyone touch the laptop and his phone

Reply Agree 2 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Ve3tro5485d ago

Honestly don't know lol, if someone could tell me that would be great. :p

Specs are.

2.8Ghz Quad Core Xeon
8GB 800 Mhz Ram
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 1GB
Win 7 - 64
1920x1080

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Omega Archetype5485d ago

Yeah, it should no problem.

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

hassi945485d ago

I'm not far off, but my graphics card is severely lacking - I only have Radeon HD5750 (OC'ed to bout 5770 level) but it's the older 512mb model :/ I may buy a 2GB 6950 and unlock it to 6970 :) Only £190-£200

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

iamgoatman5485d ago

The 6950 is an absolute bargain at the moment, saw one the other day for just under £190, and with unlocked 6970 performance, there too good to pass up if you're looking to upgrade. Best value for money around at the moment, can't go wrong!

Reply Agree 1 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

iamgoatman5485d ago

Yep, easily.

i5 2500k @ 4.3Ghz stock volts. Can hit 4.8Ghz+ if needed.
4GB DDR3 1600Mhz CAS7
2x 5850 1GB Crossfire @ 980/1200Mhz
Win 7 x64

Looking forward to seeing all that eye candy.

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

kidalot5485d ago

I can't believe I decided to have Vista. I need 3GB RAM for Crysis 2 I only have 2GB. I can just about run the 1st one....3 year old PC getting old fast.

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

steve30x5485d ago

I definately can run Crysis 2

Intel I5 760 @ 3.9ghz
Asus maximus Formula III Gene
4GB DDR3 1333mhz ram (Upgrading this in a few weeks to 2000mhx 8GB)
Palit GTX580

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Apollyn5485d ago

I love that mobo! ! Nearly bought it myself

I'm looking at upgrading my Asus striker II extreme to the new evga dual CPU board. Can't remember the name.

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

steve30x5484d ago

I bought it because it was the cheapest P55 motherboard with an external bios reset button. I love the way I can connect my laptop to the motherboard and tweak it on the run or if the computer fails to start I can connect my laptop to the motherboard to see why.

Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

tsunami9015485d ago

Does Your PC Meet Crysis 2′s System Requirements?

Reply Agree 1 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

stealth21425485d ago

Can anyone tell me will my laptop run crysis 2 on max setting 1920x1080p/intel core i5 turbo 6GHz/RAM 6GB 1066mhz/ATI Radeon HD 5870 1GB/ if anyone can comment will be very helpful.

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Apollyn5485d ago

Yeah just about ;) x

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

steve30x5484d ago

@Stealth. I highly doubt your laptop's CPU willturbo to 6GHZ. It would be more close to 3GHZ. The extreme overclockers can't get CPU's to 6GHZ on desktop machines and thats using LN2.

Reply Agree 1 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Apollyn5485d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

Mine will run this with ease and 3D running at the same time.

To my fellow master race rejoice as u hear the clacker of keys and the noise of clicks off a macro'd mouse with far to many buttons each for a different suit power up!

This will tie me over till dark souls and the Witcher!

Rather loving some of these set ups some people have :)!

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 1

SPAM Inappropriate

SkyGamer5485d ago

Back to the earlier comments, I thought that after all this time it people knew it was all about the video card. You have a decent processor but a good video card and it will give you better performance and the ability to play the game than a uber processor and "integrated" graphics. I really thought that was common knowledge. The Worlds fastest computer, China's Tihane-1 or something like that is the way it is because of the nVidia video cards they use. CPU's are great for office and audio and video encoding and maybe compression. If you want to play video games, IT IS ALL ABOUT THE GRAPHICS CARD!

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

steve30x5484d ago

If you have a slow CPU it will bottleneck the graphics card so its also important to have a half decent CPU to match the graphics card.

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

SkyGamer5482d ago

Yeah your right. You do need a decent cpu but not a high level one. That is why most of the games are stating a 2 ghz p4 cpu and a 6600gt for video. But yeah having both is awesome.

Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

SkyGamer5485d ago (Edited 5485d ago )

BTW my rig is:

Phenom2 965 BE
Zalman
16 GB DDR3-1600
Asus mobo w/sli
GTX470
SATA3 640 gb
1.5 TB SATA2 Green
2 GB SATA2 Green
Antec 902
G15
2ms Viewsonic FullHD
5.1 Surround Sound

I am ready for you Crysis 2.

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 1

SPAM Inappropriate

SuperStrokey11235485d ago

you have 16 gigs of ram? In what world would you need that especially with a processor like the 965... such a waste.

Reply Agree 4 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

SkyGamer5482d ago

Well mostly for cosmetics. I never use more than 3.5 gb of ram, maybe up to 5 gb when gaming. Just to not see any gaps in my case. Yeah I know the 965 is my bottleneck but at the time the hexacore amd was not a good one with no turbo mode like intel's. Now the bulldozer is coming out soon so I will just upgrade to that.

Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

SuperStrokey11235485d ago

Im good in some places and bare minimum in others. I have 4 gigs of ram and a q6600 @ 3.2 ghz but a 8800gt... might be a struggle for the old girl. I think ill just pass on it anyways.

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

EditorAtGNG5485d ago

Seeing how my monitor can only support resolutions up to 1280 x 1024 I am not worried at all. I play the original on Ultra with 10-20 frames and High with 30 - 40 frames per second. So, yeah, bring it on!

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

turgore5485d ago

well Crysis 2 is actually playable at launch...are you guys ready for BAttlefield 3 and Serious Sam 3 ?

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

Show all comments (153)

20°

Confirmed: the new Castlevania game isn’t a roguelike.

Christopher|16m ago|News|0|

“Castlevania Belmont’s Curse is a 2D Action-Exploration game where players can freely explore vast, elaborately crafted maps,” Tommy Williams, Konami’s Head of Communications for the Americas, tells The Verge. “It is not a roguelike or roguelite game.”

Castlevania: Belmont’s Curse PC PS5 Xbox Series X theverge.com

Read Full Story >>

theverge.com

- Comments (0)

20°

Control Resonant: Getting to Grips With Remedy’s First-Ever Melee Action Game

Christopher|26m ago|Article|0|

The Oldest House leaking into New York is all I needed to hear to be excited about Control Resonant, Remedy Entertainment’s long-anticipated follow-up to their excellent 2019 paranormal action-adventure, Control. As they recently showed us with Alan Wake 2, the folks at Remedy are not afraid to take big swings with sequels, and Control Resonant looks no less surprising and delightful than its studio and series pedigree would suggest.

Control Resonant PC PS5 Xbox Series X news.xbox.com

Read Full Story >>

news.xbox.com

- Comments (0)

20°

Fishbowl, a tender story of grief and hope, releases April 2 on PS5

Christopher|26m ago|News|0|

Plunge into the emotional mechanics and gameplay of our slice-of-life visual novel.

Fishbowl PC PS5 blog.playstation.com

Read Full Story >>

blog.playstation.com

- Comments (0)