lol wtf battlefield 3 vs Killzone 3 really?

OH BOY HERE WE GO

Haha, that was quick. But then, this is all GamingBolt have.

Aw man this is like comparing a 3 wheel Mr Bean car to a F1 car

Pc VS Console....come on now thats like comparing a BB gun to a M14.

This is a dumb comparison not only because different art style but because PC will always win in graphics. For the amount of money you have to spend on a gaming rig it better. That said, I really want to see an actual match in BF3 not these small scenes which could even be cut scenes for all I know. I guess I still have bad memories of how much they hyped MOH graphics nearly the entire year before it came out and it turned out meh and yes I played PC version. Either way, gameplay is what is important at the core and BF always was #1 IMO and I'm still purchasing BF3 PC version and will be playing KZ3 till it comes out ;)

i think battlefield 3 will be the better game what game looks better ? i don't care ;x ..i just find bfbc2 MP to be better even then kz3 MP so I'm going to say battlefield 3 will be better then killzone 3 imo..I'm sure there are people out there that like killzone more and that's cool with me.

I'm pretty sure GG can change their art style to photo realistic if they wanted to.. They have the technology, the funding and other Sony's developers support at their disposal.

Is this really any comparison smh BF3 Rapes everything ferociously

Killzone 3 looks better than any pc game ever made

Hehe

Why is it always KZ vs PC FPS?. This is getting stupid.

If GG has PC resources for KZ they would wipe the floor.

Come on this article is ridiculous, one game here clearly destroys the other.

@NateCole KZ never has and never will wipe the floor with Battlefield, battlefield bad company 2 easily looked as good if not better than KZ2 and look at the maps, look at the variety, land see and air, KZ has a long way to go before it can be compared to battlefield.

Both look GREAT & both are GREAT franchises ..... I have KZ3 & I will be gettin BF3 , this article is an attemp to start a flame war these 2 games shouldnt be compared BF franchise is based more on Modern war as of today ... Killzone franchise is based on Helghast which is fiction but still badass a fair comparison would be BF3 vs COD vs MoH !!!!

Just to let everyone know. Tesco's and curry's (uk) are doing dualshock3 controllers for £28.72.

Just bought 2:)

Oh, do fuck off with these pointless and ridiculous comparisons. BF3 is in a league of its own. The end!

PC versus Console footage? Am I missing something here?

I love how killzone is now the bar for comparisons. Go GG!

KZ3 looks like a PS2 game compared to BF3, I wouldn't be shocked if the console version looks better than KZ3.

Agreed!

The interesting thing is that, last gen, no one EVER would have compared a console shooter to a PC shooter without being laughed at. Now, though, comparisons of KZ2 and KZ3 with the highest-end of PC titles, five years after the release of the PS3, are commonplace.

That's a pretty big compliment to GG, really. 5 years of GPU tech differences is nothing to scoff at. The fact that people even watch these comparisons is proof that the PS3 is resoundingly powerful tech for its cost, and Sony's 1st party grasp on it is amazing.

Like comparing an oil painting to a photo.

BF3 is the first PC game in years that makes me want to buy a new PC. Not that I can at the moment but the need is there.

Probably already been said, but why would you compare a "nextgen" PC game to a console game?

There are no Battlefield 3 screenshots, those were magazine scans.

This truly is a next gen game, in the sense these graphics portrayed in the gameplay trailer aint feasible on the PS3 or the 360!Its a multiplat people...with the 360 holding the PS3 back with its inferior processing and storage capabilities, a multiplat of this magnitude isnt feasible!This footage will only blossom on a super high-end PC worth much more than the experience is worth!PS4 and xbox 720 YES this GEN Noooooooooooooooo

Get both games and everybody wins.
In my case it'll be Killzone 3 and BF3 (PC).

Yeah even Bad company 2 looks better than killzone 2 on my PC. My pics dont do this game justice. http://s1112.photobucket.co...

Based off these pics...Killzone 3 is definitely holding its own...which is saying a lot

I just don't understand this lame argument that you can't compare KZ3 to BF3 because they have "Different Art Styles". That's so weak!

Graphics are Graphics. I'm talking detail, textures, lighting, particle effects, volumetric smoke, colors, animation, AA, AF, post processing effects, draw distance, shadows, bullet holes, destruction, physics, plus much more all done in real-time.

As a PC gamer since KZ2 i've always said put Guerrilla Games on the PC and they would kick ass. KZ3 is only limited by it's hardware and not the developers who went all out and did a fantastic job and have included just about everything you could into KZ3 as far as graphics.

But The Frostbite 2.0 engine is like 2 or 3 generations ahead of whatever KZ3 uses which is like putting a Mustang 5.0 up against a Ferrari...A Ferrari that has DICE on the plates. Sure both cars are fast but the Ferrari will win every time.

This is NOT a knock against KZ3 or Guerrilla Games because they are one of my favorite developers so far but FB 2.0 is just too superior. Hell BC2 PC in DX11 mode looks better than KZ3, just barely though.
but again it's the hardware not the developers effort.

killzone 3 is pretty bad ass.

funny how the comparisons use the worst kz3 shots though. this is for all the insecure PC fanboys.

"my graphics card set up is $600 so my graphics are better than yours!!!! WAHHHHHHH!!!!!" lol..

no need to compare this 2 games. obviously battlefield 3 is superior

Tell me again how the multiplatform strategy was supposed to fix everything. Look at your results and compare them to Nintendo, which keeps thriving with exclusives. Your loyal fans are gone. And let’s not forget the pile of IPs you purchased only to let them rot.

The worst thing is this is down from last years numbers/expectations which was down from the previous years numbers/expectations. You think about how long “down” has been a consistent part of the communication and you realize those subscriptions are what’s holding that boat together. The price cut of gamespass is still a price raise in a string of price raises. They are trying to use players to offset the missing revenue. Now call of duty is out of gamespass, which is literally WHY they bought the company. To draw people to the subscription. They realized they missed a boatload of money and that wasn’t sustainable. Now you pay for it like you would have if they never bought the company… so why buy the company? Mind you those billions still need to be paid back. Yeah it gives you a chance to say we make the biggest FPS… but the internal conversations must be brutal at high level on topics that really matter. Like revenue. Profitability. And ROI for the shopping spree.

Is this like the 10th quarter in a row they're down 33% on hardware how is that even mathematically possible. You would think their mediocrity would Plateau