100°

Is the Virtual Console a Failure?

After over four years of operation, the Virtual Console is finding itself yet another home. In light of its expansion onto the 3DS, PixlBit has taken a look at the service since its inception and answered the question, is the Virtual Console a failure?

christheredhead5490d ago

the virtual console is no where near a failure. there is a ridiculous amount of classic games on the service. it has slowed down tremendously and of course there could always be more games, as you can never have to many, but theres quite a bit of content already.

guitarded775490d ago

I thought the virtual console was the best part of the Wii... I like being able to play The Legend of Zelda without having to hook up another system.

NukaCola5490d ago (Edited 5490d ago )

I had the 4 in one pack from the Gamecube, but I get what you mean. I bought all the Donkey Kongs and Mario Kart 64. It's a nice way to get throwback titles. And a good way to let kids learn their gaming roots.

EDIT:::: I don't get the disagree? Explain yourselves please.

GodsHand5490d ago

I did not disagree, nor agree, but if you want to go back to the gaming roots, you have to beyond Nintendo 64, even past Nintendo period.

NukaCola5490d ago

The Virtual Console plays everything though. Even the Master system. But it's a good source for tons of classics.

SuperStrokey11235490d ago (Edited 5490d ago )

Was a hit for me, i love it. I wish they had more of the games i wanted but ive still bought about 30 games on it. Very good for me but to each their own.

tunaks15490d ago

well it does what it was set to do.
I got to replay some nes, snes, and n64 games. I don't see how thats a failure.

nevin15490d ago

If I ever get a Wii, the VC is only feature I'll use.

Show all comments (14)
60°

Farewell to the Virtual Console, the boldest part of Nintendo's mid-00s revolution

Nintendo's mid-noughties revolution feels so distant now, even if its impact hasn't really dimmed. The touch sensation of the DS led in its own way to the iOS revolution, the motion controls of the Wii helped reestablish video games in the living room and push them towards the mainstream, and the reverberations of both are felt to this day. There's another facet of its revolution that sadly never had the same impact, and now is set to finally fizzle away.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
fan_of_gaming1076d ago

yet another part of gaming where the past was better than what we get in the present/future.

70°

The Virtual Console vs. Nintendo Switch Online

Streaming services have become really popular in the last decade. Are subscription and streaming services right for Videogames?

Nintendo Switch Online has replaced the Virtual Console but is the service up to the standard of previous Nintendo offerings? Furthermore, do subscription services like Xbox’s Game Pass and NSO really suit video games? This article explores these issues and looks back at the Virtual Console.

Read Full Story >>
finalweapon.net
Immagaiden1112d ago

I see no reason Nintendo can’t just offer both

FinalFantasyFanatic1112d ago

I really miss the VC, I don't want more subscriptions that I have to, I try to keep as few as possible.

silkylove1111d ago

VC is better imo. I got games like Super Metroid for like 30 cents. If NSO allowed you to play online with anybody then I would give it the edge.

80°

Why Can't Nintendo Offer Both Virtual Console And Switch Online?

While that's valid, though, that old social media meme 'why not both?' springs to mind. Why not have subscription options and a Virtual Console eShop? With NSO being multi-faceted in its offering, it seems unlikely that everyone would drop that subscription in a heartbeat in order to buy Super Mario Bros. for $5.

Read Full Story >>
nintendolife.com
Inverno1149d ago

Because a yearly flow of money is better than people buying specifically what they want. If online was also not behind a paywall you'd be surprised just how many people would drop the sub. When you're only given one option there's not much of a choice.

FallenAngel19841149d ago

No reason not to have both. Consumers would have the option of buying separately like PS+ and Game Pass owners can or have access to it all with a sub

Inverno1149d ago

Of course there's no reason, and Nintendo fans have been very vocal about virtual console being brought back. I think however that those who really have an issue with how Nintendo has handled classic games have stayed with emulation. I know the appeal of being able to buy instead of the free alternative. As I see it, it sends a message that there's still an audience for these games, but for whatever reason it may be it's not been made easy to the consumer.

CrimsonWing691149d ago

I miss the Virtual Console. I really want HAM with it on the Wii.

Chocoburger1149d ago

Just another reason why modding your Switch can fix almost all of the flaws Nintendo purposefully created on their platform. Save file back ups being another reason. Nintendo is the only company that forces you to pay money in order to back up your save files, and it doesn't even work for all games. Talk about anti-consumer B.S.!

ZeekQuattro1149d ago

Because it was only successful on the Wii. Both the Wii U and 3DS VC offerings were no where as successful. It was time to move on from that service. More and more 3rd parties devs started supplying older games in other ways on the Switch so there's no need. Look at all the Capcom collections for instance. Even Konami got in on it. Same with Neo Geo or Atari collections. I could go on and on.