All Channels
Popular
80°

Cheap Games: Threat to the Industry or Next Evolution?

Whether major game developers like it or not, indie games are more prevalent now than ever. A section of the industry that used to have an exclusively underground following has been cast into the forefront thanks to the increasing attention being paid to mobile games on platforms like iOS and Android. Even Xbox Live Marketplace has given independent developers their own section of their virtual store. This new market has not only brought new developing talents into the spotlight, but has encouraged major developers to step up the quality and value of their products just to compete.

In a recent statement, Reggie Fils-Aime of Nintendo claimed these independent titles may actually be the death of the video game industry as we know it, making the high-selling and critically acclaimed Angry Birds the poster child for his argument.

Read Full Story >>
videogamewriters.com
DFresh5581d ago

Nah.

It's just a different market.

Just like there are different varieties of games there's also different types of gaming to go along with that variety.

ex.)
-Console Gaming [PS3/Xbox 360/Wii]

-Mobile Gaming (iPhone/Android)

-Computer Gaming (PC/Mac)

-Portable Gaming [PSP/DS/3DS/PSP2(NGP)]

-Digital Downloads [PSN/XBL/Steam/Wii Network]

MaroonersRock5581d ago

I agree. I think having variety is important, especially when there are so many different kinds of gamers. To cater to one demographic would be foolish, so I think companies are realizing that if they make cheaper, more accessible games their audience will grow which in turn means more profit.

DFresh5581d ago (Edited 5581d ago )

I agree.

Variety and innovation is important to the growth of any business or company.

Also it's good for gamers (consumers) to try out new things whenever they can.

Edit:
Forgot to mention motion controller gaming too.
-Motion Controller Gaming
(PS Move/Kinect/Wii Remote & Nunchuck)

-Free 2 Play Gaming. (Face Book and other web browser based games.)

etc.

thebudgetgamer5581d ago

i love a cheap game as much as the next probably more, but it's games like mgs, battlefield and gears that really interest me.

BShea5581d ago

I agree entirely. I loved Angry Birds, downloaded all of the different versions and played them to death, but I'm done with them after a few months and will only go back to them while in waiting rooms or in a car ride. Unlike games like Borderlands and RDR, where I constantly go back to them, even after beating them.

Tenkin5581d ago

Calling it the 'next evolution' makes it a threat to the major game devs

BShea5581d ago

Or will the ones not a part of that evolution (i.e. major game studios) just have to adapt to the new conditions to keep successful as outlined in the article?

Tenkin5581d ago

It's a threat to larger studio's unwilling to evolve such as naughty dog one of the larger game studios or studios owned by Nintendo

strickers5581d ago

It is not workable for the industry as a whole but I think a varied price scheme based on costs is a good idea.
Something like the NGP or 3DS,Wii,PS3 or 360 should have a couple of quid Angry Birds,up to a £40 Mass Effect.

crunchychocobo5581d ago

Wow, thanks for scraping an article published a few hours earlier from a different site. http://gamesareevil.com/201...

killyourfm5581d ago (Edited 5581d ago )

Hey Kari, I can confirm that the author has been drafting this article for several days, and we've been brainstorming it well beyond that timeframe. Take one look at videogamewriters.com and you'd realize we're not "scrapers." Also, as GamesAreEvil's former founder and editor, I can personally assure you this is not the case. Quite frankly we're a bit too swamped :-)

If this is a legitimate concern that you'd prefer to address privately instead of airing publicly, by all means feel free to PM me.

joeyda5581d ago (Edited 5581d ago )

Two editorials with the same argument and flow published within hours of one another? Doubtful.

EDIT: AND! Your connection to GamesAreEvil only further solidifies the likelihood that this story is plagiarism. Think about it, GrE is a small site (no offense, guys!), you knowing it well only firms up the possibility that you're stealing content from it.

roblef5581d ago

As GrE's other founder and current Executive Editor, I have to say that regardless of the incredible coincidence of these two articles, the documentation behind them looks to show that they both were written at similar times and independently.

That's bound to happen when two sites come at the same topical area as we both do, and when they both have such talented writers as Mr Shea and Mr. DeWoody.

I suggest we all let this go, and try to all be friends. Because honestly, do we NEED more bad blood or flame wars on N4G?

MattG-PTB5581d ago (Edited 5581d ago )

GrE has a better take on this topic, I think.

killyourfm5581d ago

I'm not here to judge which article is better, I'm here to defend my staff.

BShea5581d ago

Definitely not "scraped" As KillYourFM pointed out, I've been writing the article since the day that I saw the news from Reggie. He actually proofread it yesterday and we held off on publishing it until today due to an abundance of content yesterday.

Show all comments (20)
50°

U.S. patent examiner rejects Nintendo’s summoning characters patent as obvious: non-final ruling

The rejection is non-final (and even when such rejections are labeled as “final”, the process is far from over, given that there can be, at minimum, an appeal to the Federal Circuit).

Read Full Story >>
gamesfray.com
Relientk7752d ago (Edited 52d ago )

Good, as they should! A game mechanic like that shouldn't be locked behind a patent, and Nintendo didn't invent it either.

PRIMORDUS51d ago (Edited 51d ago )

Nintendo wants to keep wasting money on bullshit lawsuits, real smart in this economy. They should put that money aside for other game projects. On the other hand, I don't care if they waste it all either, and they are screwed in the future maybe that will teach them a lesson.

40°

Nintendo Completes Share Repurchase and Sets Price for Secondary Offering

Nintendo completed its share repurchase and set its secondary offering price at 8,347 yen ahead of March 16 delivery.

Read Full Story >>
4scarrsgaming.com
60°

Nintendo Suing U.S. Government Over Tariffs

Nintendo filed a lawsuit in the United States Court of International Trade.

Nintendo of America is suing the United States government over the sweeping tariffs President Donald Trump put in place last year, according to a complaint filed Friday in the U.S. Court of International Trade and obtained by Aftermath.

Read Full Story >>
aftermath.site
Deathdeliverer77d ago

Well dayum lol. Old agent orange pissing off every industry and nation.

0hMyGandhi76d ago

The fact that you have ANY disagrees will forever baffle me. And to the (apparent) MAGA contingent that exists on this website, enjoy your 8-9 dollar gas.

AuraAbjure76d ago (Edited 76d ago )

Yes, they had better be pissed after Trump told them the way they rip off the USA is over.

EveryPlatformGamer77d ago

LOL I read this on gaff, will they refund the money back to the gamers? highly unlikely. Didn't they just raise prices and pass it onto the gamers? Only Nintendo would send out the Ninjas to the US government.

-Foxtrot77d ago

That’s what I was thinking, imagine them winning hypothetically, getting a s**t load of money back which they would have lost if they hadn’t raised their prices and it’s business as normal.

It would just mean people paid more for no reason since they got the money back anyway.

Outside_ofthe_Box76d ago (Edited 76d ago )

A lot of companies partially passed the cost to consumers instead of all of it. They would still have to at least pay that back to gamers, but we know that won't happen. What's also sad is that prices won't come back down after the initial hike caused by tariffs.

People didn't understand the full repercussions of tariffs. That alone should have cost him the presidency if people knew it was a permanent price hike for consumers

Inverno77d ago

The people should sue these companies for having to over pay cause of these tariffs.

Eonjay77d ago

Naw they should sue the government for forcing the tax to begin with. No one reasonably expects these companies to absorb the taxes. Many smaller companies tried and were shut down or faced to increase prices to try to maintain their business. The tariffs effect everyone.

Inverno75d ago

I meant it mostly as a joke cause we all know the costs of these tariffs were passed onto the consumer. But it's seems no matter how vocal we are here in the states our "representatives" don't seem to care enough to represent us. And things are about to get worse.

Killer2020UK75d ago

The companies were doing what the law required then to do, the tariffs however were illegally implemented. Usually it's criminals we punish, you seem to have different ideas 🤷‍♂️

Show all comments (18)