Well... as far as i can tell, battlefield was always the better shooter anyway. Nothing to kill in terms of quality. All Call of Duty has is a mindless legion of fools who pay for the same crap year after year and have low expectations for games.

Someone needs to tell Killzone 3 you don't beat COD by trying to be COD

Best statement of 2011 about fps's confirmed! That is why it's a bigger game on PC thanx you dice (for evolving the genre)I will give you all of my cash!! Besides the free mods..

While others play call of duty:Crap Box..

if I was a pure console gamer I would stick to killzone..
During a Twitter Q&A session, Kertz also said it’s unlikely there’ll be a server browser for console versions of the game, which probably means due to technical reasons this will be cut the number of players from 64 – confirmed for the PC version – to 24, although Kertz wouldn’t confirm or deny these figures.

This is a really dumb statement.

Does he think CoD is popular because people dislike the concepts that make it CoD?

While I agree that ripping off CoD to-a-tee is not the best plan of action, ignoring its greatness is just as foolish.

Ironically, BF3 is sounding just like CoD, except with 24 players instead of 18, and destructible environs. ..and mission-objective based play, hopefully. I guess you beat CoD by being CoD, including some MAG, and throwing in some destructible environs?

Kinda sounds like BF:BC2 to me, which, while very fun, didn't "beat" CoD at all last time around.

If Killzone 3 is not trying to copy COD then why has the heavy feel of the guns and aim been stripped away. It's now noob friendly. Anyone can snipe now, just like in COD. Why have they added those little on screen scores for kills. They have borrowed as much from COD as they could without the game being called a rip off. All they need now is to add rc cars for 3 kills and we have CODZONE.

Well one good news is they didn't copy Halo Reach phew thats a relief....................oh they didn't Jetpacks lol :(

let the shit talkin begin. b3 is what we need after years of cod. i didnt get blackops and im sure as hell not getting mw3. cant wait for this game

In Killzone 3 the removal of custom matches, squads, proximity chat, and the ability to switch teams were all changes made to attract COD casuals.

They wanted this game to be played by the COD crowd, simple as that.

I hope BF3 don't come out this year.

Lol, no offence but why does EA keep saying they are going try and make a better shooter then COD?

I bet they could but the problem is....alot of COD sheep think COD is the king of shooters, so COD will always outsell any EA shooter game till people realize COD has been the same since 2007.

Since when was COD the 1st shooter to include smooth and responsive controls?

MOH 1999

COD 2003

Wise words.

Every MP shooter will be a dwarf under Battlefield 3s giant boot.

The only way i see cod being killed is by it's own creators aka Respawn entertainment they created it so they know how to kill it xDDD.

***COUGH*** SOCOM ***COUGH COUGH***

i like how the time machine works in this games

I will go for quality over quantity any day, on any platform.

The only thing Call of Duty has yet to be beat in is sales numbers. It's already been surpassed in quality by Bad Company 2.

All that needs to happen is better marketing. EA needs to STEP IT UP with Battlefield 3. The past Battlefield games have a HUGE following, which has been waiting for a true sequel to Battlefield 2.

this is going to be the norm now

with MMO it's beating WoW and being a WoW clone
with FPS it's beating CoD and being a CoD clone

Even though there's already better games out there than both WoW and CoD people still flock to them the most when comparing.

Battlefield already beat CoD in gameplay, they don't need to change anything.

Give PS3 40 at least, it can do it.

BF2 is a better game then COD and that came out like 6 years ago.

Why are they so reluctant to create a new Bad Company??

Definitely agree with the title. If they make Bad Company 3 then that would definitely be a step in the right direction!

It’s done. The current development team has no idea why people liked BF.

BF3? They need to go back to BF2 for the mainline. Heck, I'd settle for true-to-source remakes of BF2 and BC2 (w/ Vietnam). Everything they've done in the 'modern' era is just bad.

Doubt they will smh which is messed up

EAis pretending to be one of those deaf mutes

I've not played 2042 myself but after v I don't feel like it. I played a few hours of v with friends but it feels ultra sterile I can't figure it out but the game looks and feels clinical. The storys in the campaign were also bland and uninteresting and felt like a dull trudge through checkpoints as you waited for an ending.

I've played the franchise dating back to it's original PC launch and PS2 spin off games I did enjoy 1 overall and it's take on placing you in different scenarios and battles was interesting but not all that good imo as you couldn't really connect with any characters longer than 2 hours.

hardline for all the hate it recived was a fun story and a new take but a bad mp game

I feel like v overall was the turning point and instead of showing the gritty reality of war they turned everything sterile and presented it in a clean cut boring frame in order to pump it full of weird micro transactions overall they spent far to much time on trying to implant ray tracing and other graphical flourishes and forgot to make the game enjoyable

I mean thats all we've wanted since BF4 but they keep doing everything we don't want.