All Channels
Popular
110°

Is Backward Compatibility Still Important?

With Sony’s NGP making a switch to a card-based format, a lot of the old UMD based games will never get re-released on the new format. The lack of backward compatibility support is nothing new as seen by what Microsoft and Sony did before. So the big question is, do we even care about having the backward compatibility feature anymore?

Read Full Story >>
thekartel.com
Shok5606d ago

To a lot of people yes, but apparently, Sony doesn't think so.

In the end though, we'll all get over it the same way we got over 95% of PS3 lacking BC, so oh well. If you want to play your PSP games I guess you just have to bust out your PSP.

Bazinga5606d ago

Very true. We are quite forgiving aren't we..

Yi-Long5606d ago

... for years, we invest a whole lot of money building up a nice games-collection.

However, when your console breaks down and it's no longer for sale, you're stuck with all your games and no way to play them, if there is no Backwards Compatibilty on the newer machines.

That just sucks.

Also, for stuff like XBLA and PSN games, I think it's a MUST that they will still be playable on the next generation of consoles.

gcolley5606d ago

good point about arcade style downloaded games. they definitely need to be supportedon the next system or their digital disty model can go get f@#$ked

klado5606d ago (Edited 5606d ago )

People never bothered when the DSi discarded Gameboy advance/below support, how intriguing eh?

Or when gamecube didn't support n64 or 360 not support mos Xbox releases.

So much biasness in the media & people's mind toward sony ^u^, what makes a gaming system a "GAMING SYSTEM" is ITS own games, not some old game you didn't happen to play, yes I understand the need and the confortability of having a system that plays your old Card/cartridges/UMD, but now a days, it is just plain irrelevant.

What sony and all companies should do and most like will happen, is make their consoles to emulate these olds games through digital release, like Nintendo seem to be doing with the eEshop and so sony with the PSN/ps1 classic soon ps2 then PSP.

Bother me how naive bunch of people tend to ideologize the trend with tech.

soren5606d ago

the thing is it was a choice and um sony never has backwerds compatiabale stuff they just barly kinda have it lol

Shok5606d ago (Edited 5606d ago )

I honestly don't see why you are jumping on me, as I was in no way bashing Sony or showing bias, nor did I mention Nintendo or Microsoft.

But you brought up some very bad examples.

1)The DSi wasn't a DS 2, it was just a revision and completely optional to buy (as opposed to a successor, where people would want to go out and buy it since it's more powerful/offers new games/the next big thing). And let's be honest here - 99.9% of anyone who bought a DSi already had a DS/DS Lite.

2) Nintendo didn't have BC with the GameCube? Oh no, you got me there, guess that means they don't care about BC, although that was last generation, while this generation, they have both of their systems with BC (Wii and 3DS.) Also, The PS1 had CDs. It would've been silly if the GameCube used cartridges. Nintendo was forced to have no BC due to advancing the physical game format.

3) Yes Microsoft is guilty of it too........but when did I say they weren't?

4) Totally agree with you on the digital release thing.

john master lee5606d ago

Or Sony could let you own that game via digital download. There must be a solution, because I'm sitting on pile of UMD's and was already irked that the PSPGo didn't support them. Now these things aren't even good for propping up a crooked table.

George Sears5606d ago (Edited 5606d ago )

If there is absolutely no possible way to add backwards compatibility on the NGP then I understand and Sony shouldn't really bother. I already have my old collecting dust PSP whom which I could still use to play my old collection of games.

I wouldn't be surprised if they make HD remakes of older PSP games. You know, the most cheap ass tactic I've ever seen to grab people's money again.

Dave13515606d ago

No its not important, new games for a new system

Bazinga5606d ago

But what about all the great classics. Wouldn't it just be easier if we just HAD the option to play any old game we want tis what I'm saying.

Mr Tretton5606d ago

You do have an option to play your old games, on your old system.

Some of my all time fave games are old, and I haven't played them in years because I just prefer to move on with my short life and experience other things.

liveActionLeveler5606d ago

@Mr Tretton

Yes, but having b/c would make it easier to have one system for the people that wanna relive the past. However, it's obvious that sony wasn't going to use UMD, but they still might have been able to do some UMD data rip.

JOLLY15606d ago

I know that is was when the 360 wasn't 100% backwards compatible. Now that other systems don't have it though, no one seems to mind if it isn't there.

moogle845606d ago

Well it just eradicates the systems before it right? If CD was used more universally man... there might even be an even playing field.

Show all comments (25)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai42d ago (Edited 42d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio41d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing41d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9241d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit41d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing41d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9241d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
44d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted44d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8544d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele43d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla43d ago (Edited 43d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk43d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay43d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 43d ago
Athlon10144d ago (Edited 44d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit43d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg43d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10143d ago (Edited 43d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14944d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay43d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn244d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers44d ago (Edited 44d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn243d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown44d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos44d ago (Edited 44d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay43d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay43d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac43d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger44d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300044d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde44d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood44d ago (Edited 44d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde43d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)