lol, lens of truth have been known to stack the odds in favour of the xbox, dont see you mention that though.

Nonsense. PS3 fanboys 'claim' Lens of truth (and Digital foundry for that matter) are biased because they don't like the results these sites uncover.

I have played both demos myself and believe me the two versions look much closer to what lens of truth captured than to these screenshots that this guy took of his tv screen.

You see, that is why I know digital foundry and lens of truth are not full of crap...it's because I have compared so many of these games myself and I know that what they show is the same thing that I see.

Actually, the only times I have disagreed a little bit with one of these sites was with lens of truth because they sometimes try to skew things to favor the PS3(even though they are generally pretty fair).

For example, they tried to blow very minor things out of proportion for Mirror's Edge and Batman Arkham Asylum to give the advantage to the PS3, when in reality as far as things that actually have a real impact on the visual experience 98% of the time you are playing.. the 360 versions of both of those games were clearly superior.

But like I said, lens of truth have generally been pretty good with their comparisons. There have just been a few times where I think they kind of unfairly skewed things in favor of the PS3. Which makes it kind of ironic that PS3 fanboys claim they are biased against the PS3. If anything they have shown slight favoritism towards the PS3 a few times. Although, like I said before, they are generally pretty accurate in their comparisons as far as what I actually find when I compare the games myself.

yeah? what about castlevania, final fantasy, burnout paradise, need for speed shift and hot persuit, all better on ps3 by a good bit, but downplayed so the diffrence didnt seem so important, and before you start all the fanboy crap i own all 3 console and play my 360 the most, just the truth. no need to cry with a post the size of an article. oh and your not the only one that can do comparisons, anyone can, and 9 times out of 10, you cant see the diffrence with your eyes, its imposible, anyway, happy gaming

^Other than being 720p, the console versions don't look that different. Other than 30fps and 720p, they look the same. Sadly that's the only difference when console games don't really take advantage of PC hardware.

For the record I also have DR2 for PC.

@Sarcasm

That is simply not true. The character models have a higher poly count. Higher res textures, higher res shadows, more anisotropic filtering, better shaders.

Even the worst ports all have those things over the console variants.

There are also more enemies on screen at a time and the FOV is also higher.

I must say PC gamers could very well be more predictable than xbox gamers.

Those games look better than bulletstorm. So in terms of graphics its

Killzone2, MGS4, GOD3 > Bulletstorm

Okay. You trying to say I didn't take the picture myself. Did you even look at it?

yeah i saw the piece of paper so?

I am very sorry for bashing you the way i did. Even though i looked at the pic i failed to notice your signature on the paper. I take back everything i said.

yeah, because you know, if someone disagrees with what you have to say they MUST be a fanboy for the other side.

Please, the whining about disagrees is just sad...(even though, I do believe that if you disagree you should at least reply as well to explain why.)

I'm saying it's impossible to disagree with fact. It's as simple as that.

You REALLY think this site did a fairer comparison than Lens of Truth??? For Pete's sake, look at the time stamp on every PHOTO- it's blown out.

Now look at the time stamp in a direct feed: http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Who are you going to side with:
A) The site nobody's ever heard of, that takes pictures of their TV with a point-and-shoot
B) The site who can afford an HD capture card, and all the other direct feed sources on Youtube etc.

You'd pick A? LOL.