All Channels
Popular
330°

EA 'In Talks With Sony' To Develop For NGP

Electronic Arts has explained to NowGamer why it was missing from the substantial list of developers set to develop for Sony's next handheld console...

Read Full Story >>
nowgamer.com
ubiquitious5581d ago (Edited 5581d ago )

We need assurances that this won't tank like the PSP did.

Well played, EA.

ActionBastard5581d ago

Over 60 million sold worldwide + http://www.ea.com/platform/... = your fail comment

Baka-akaB5581d ago (Edited 5581d ago )

that's not the issue , yes the psp was a success , but not every publisher thrived on it .

Besides the usual array of fifa/madden etc , do we even know a successful psp ea game ?

Of course it's in great part the fault of EA , the first to push its shoddy ports on psp .

If you already got fifa on home consoles , why would you pick their psp version with no advantages whatsoever ?

zootang5581d ago (Edited 5581d ago )

Need for speed most wanted is EA's biggest seller on the PSP with 1.3m. Not bad at all!

You know for sure that there will be an exclusive Rockstar title for the NGP with GTA liberty city stories selling 2.7m

ReBurn5581d ago (Edited 5581d ago )

60+ million PSP's sold and one of the lowest software attach rates ever. EA probably wants assurances that their software isn't going to be pirated before it ever hits store shelves. That's one of the biggest problems the PSP has faced.

It's a good system, but it is cracked wide open. Publishers have fled from this platform and that's sad. It's a really great handheld.

tacosRcool5581d ago

Only here in North America the PSP isn't doing well because of the lack of developers and publishers for the system.

meetajhu5581d ago

Bulletstorm would be nice to see in this beast!

Inside_out5581d ago (Edited 5581d ago )

Sony basically brow beat developers and publishers into excepting their exorbitant fees because PS2 sold 100+ million and used that as leverage...pay backs are a bitch.

Sony is nowhere near that lofty number and never will be and the vultures are circling...lol.

Activision was the first to bitch slap the mighty Sony into submission when they told those guys to drop the price of the PS3 or Activision was gonna walk away from them. Activision was right and they announced to the world that Sony had made a billion dollars off of Activision so they better listen. The share holders are always listening...they dropped that price and fast.

EA is renegotiating there deal with the " were number 3 " Sony guys...it's all business. If Sony ever gets back to the top, they will have some negotiating power...it won't be this gen...lol.

Remember when Sony tried to beat down the patent holders of the controller rumble...lol...how arrogant was Sony. Then they tried to go solo with no rumble...LMFAO.

pain777pas5581d ago

Here is the issue and you could tell by the developers at the press conference. What are we gonna do here? NGP is powerful. Console like. Equipped with all existing communication functions of the PS3 and more. What do we do? If you can port a game in a matter of days to the system like the Epic developers again. What do we do? Should there be a paradigm shift within EA? What if they are thinking how can we charge the gamer twice for the same experience on NGP and PS3? Will they create $70 PS3 games with the NGP version on the BD to be downloaded and saved in the cloud to pick up where you left off on the console. This NGP could open up so many opportunities and gamers could benefit like never before. EA should think about how they should approach this and make gamers happy. I would pay a little extra to have the PS3 and NGP versions of the game. Yet this MAY limit the usage of the touch screen etc... However they could still build their UIs around the specs of the Touch screens for certain things. I think that their sports games would work great with the 2 versions on one BD approach and $10 premium since as we have heard porting is fast and easy.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5581d ago
darthv725581d ago

EA is secretly making their own console/portable unit.

Zinc5581d ago

That has nothing to do with it. Most likely, this has to do with Sony royalty/license fees. They are probably trying to negotiate a 1-2% reduction or something along those lines. Even small reductions like that can add up to big numbers in the end.

Regardless, they will make games for this platform. It would be unrealistic to believe otherwise.

saladthieves5581d ago

EA 'In Talks With Sony' To Develop For NGP

-In other words, they're up to something large and good...a surprise??

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5581d ago
SnakeMustDie5581d ago

Mass Effect for NGP
Dead Space for NGP
Bioshock for NGP
Crysis for NGP

ksense5581d ago (Edited 5581d ago )

either at e3 or even GDC they will announce or show those games on NGP to get it hyped. EA and Sony have a good partnership so they are probably just planning something big.

Mass Effect and Dragon Age on the go OH HELL YEA

pain777pas5581d ago

ME and DA would benefit the most from the touch screen for setting up traps and strategically moving your characters. ME 5 min missions. Totalling 30hr game. Sounds great. ME and DA would be perfect for NGP.

Charazani5581d ago (Edited 5581d ago )

Bioshock is published by Take-Two which wholly owns 2K.

Also, don't quote me, the EA partners program allows third party developers to keep their IPs, meaning Crysis NGP would be Crytek's decision and not EA's.

Arnon5581d ago (Edited 5581d ago )

I was about to say... You guys don't honestly believe the NGP is powerful enough to run Crysis, especially when we already have the hardware specs for it, right? :/

Undeadwolfy5581d ago

@above You don't honestly think that the game will be an exact port from the PS3 do you?

Ever heard of optimisation?

Flashwave_UK5581d ago

lol crysis on ngp cry_sis doesnt even diserve to be on the ps3

TheGreatIndonesia5581d ago

ngp is more powerful than 360, i think its doable

Arnon5581d ago (Edited 5581d ago )

"Ever heard of optimisation?"

No, I've never heard of "optimisation."*

You are setting yourself up for overall disappointment in terms of the NGP if you think they're going to be able to optimize a game like Crysis on a handheld, when it's console counterpart (the PS3) cant even RUN the first game, let alone have a game that looks anywhere near as good as Crysis.

http://i162.photobucket.com...

The NGP's a monster of a handheld, but relatively speaking, it's not that powerful. The minimum requirements for Crysis are higher than the hardware specifications of the NGP.

*I assume you are referring to the term "optimization".

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5581d ago
skyward5581d ago

If FIFA and Madden don't hit NGP that's a large piece of the market that will reconsider getting one...

hamburger1235581d ago

Yeah man that would be so awesome if I could play FIFA with this gen graphics instead of the PSP graphics:O

CANNOT WAIT

CaptainPunch5581d ago

I want Dead Space on the PSP2, and maybe Mirror's Edge 2.

Undeadwolfy5581d ago

The more games the better, bring as many games as possible cos they will look awesome.

I wanna see a Heavy Rain with NGP. Imagine all those different controls for it.

just_looken5581d ago (Edited 5581d ago )

ea great there the ms of the gameing market 90% of ea games this gen are crap or just $$ makers. look at moh...

The_Nameless_One5581d ago

Great grammar there Tex. Now, would you please edit your comment so people can actually understand what the hell you wrote.

just_looken5581d ago

? if you don't know what ms/moh/$/ea means then google it

theonlylolking5581d ago

MOH is a good game. If you are talking about games this gen are crap and are just $$ then you should talk about activision.

just_looken5581d ago

im refereing to ea's crap quality but sense you enjoy a fps with trigger spawns/dumb ai and bad glitch's you will enjoy ea's quality have you tried mercs2? mercs1 beats it handsdown also me2 ps3 receiveing patch to fix me3 engine issues and corrupt save issue.

CernaML5581d ago

Because EA's games have been the ONLY games to receive patches this gen, right?

Also, The_Nameless_One wasn't just talking about the acronyms you used that weren't understandable. Your ENTIRE sentence structure made it extremely hard to decipher what you were trying to say.

EA has introduced some of the greatest new IPs this generation. They seem to be the only publisher with two of the most talented studios that can make a multiplatform game look and run 110% identically between both the 360 and PS3.

You're looking at the wrong publisher. Activision is what you want to refer to.

Show all comments (46)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
16d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted16d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8516d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele15d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla15d ago (Edited 15d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk15d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay15d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 15d ago
Athlon10116d ago (Edited 16d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit15d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg15d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10115d ago (Edited 15d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14916d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
29d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_29d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle28d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit28d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog29d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog29d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad29d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_29d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage29d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda28d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

29d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong55d ago

looks god awful on the base systems