All Channels
Popular
140°

What Should The NGP’s Final Name Be?

Mugampi.com writes "Let’s be honest here, Next Generation Portable is as generic as it gets. Why not just call it the PSP2 and be done with it? Well, I’ve come to one conclusion, Sony is trying to think of a better name, PSP2 isn’t good enough"

iamnsuperman5589d ago

I think the PSP2 is a good name. NGP sounds as if it isn't part of the playstation brand which is a shame. But whatever the name will be it doesn't matter as long as it has great games

InactiveUser5589d ago (Edited 5589d ago )

PSP2 - PlayStation Portable 2

Anything else goes against the consistency of the PlayStation Brand.

I'm also going to go off topic and suggest an abbreviation and pronunciation for the PlayStation Phone:

PSPh (pronounced PSF) for the PlayStation Phone

PS - PlayStation Brand as a whole
PSX - PlayStation 2 / DVR Combo (Also the PS1's prototype: PlayStation X)
PS1 - PlayStation (the 1st console)
PS2 - PlayStation 2 (the 2nd console)
PS3 - PlayStation 3 (the 3rd console)
PSP - PlayStation Portable
PSP2 - PlayStation Portable 2
PSPh - PlayStation Phone

PSNGP - way off from the rest.. It's pretty obvious it won't be called 'Next Generation Portable' though, because the second it releases, it becomes a Current Generation Portable.

Billy_Dee_Williams5589d ago

There is no psp phone. Why dont people realize that the sony ericson xperia play has nothing to do with the psp?

Karum5589d ago

NGP isn't meant to sound like part of any brand, it is nothing more than a codename or working title whilst they decide what they actually want to call it.

Project Natal is another example of a codename or working title, something many products have before the official retail name is finalised.

Heroes on the Move was another recent one that comes to mind, it was just a working title until they figured out they wanted to call the game Move Heroes.

InactiveUser5589d ago

Good comment, just throwing out that I liked the 'Heroes on the Move' name better than 'Move Heroes'...

B-Real2065589d ago (Edited 5589d ago )

I made a forum topic of this last night and got kind of hated on, but the proof is in the pudding as they say. http://forums.n4g.com/Name-...

I strongly believe that if they wanted to call it psp2 they would have. They named it NGP for a reason. Everyone laughed and had a good time. Now I don't have much proof but this is what was said on the ps blog (us)

Rey Gutierrez | January 29th, 2011 at 4:28 pm
NGP is only a code name, and goes far beyond just calling it a PSP2. E3 will reveal more!

My choice PSP Pro

LightofDarkness5589d ago

Well, history has proven that there's a general (and strange)popularity associated with TLAs (three letter acronyms). Using more letters and numbers makes things sound less snappy and "edgy" somehow. I'm not a behavioral or social scientist so I don't know the nitty-gritties of it all, but going for anything like PSP HD et al wouldn't sound as enticing to a consumer.

The next issue they have is whether or not they want to stick with the PSP branding at all. It's already an established name, but some may associate it with the previous PSP and figure that this device too is "just not for me, I prefer my simpler DS."

Personally, I say stick with NGP. Just call it the "Playstation NGP" or just NGP for short. I think it works.

n4f5589d ago

come on it will be call psp2 im willing to bet

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5589d ago
dtrain215589d ago

Everyone will still call it PSP2...but knowing Sony they will name it somethin stupid like the MOVE.

DeeZee5589d ago

Haha, I think Move isn't too bad of a name, but I agree. Everyone will still call it the PSP2.

hamburger1235589d ago

They should name it PS3GO

or PS3Mini

Rrobba5589d ago

PSP2. What's wrong with that?

d3nworth15589d ago

Maybe Sony trying to be more creative with the names of their console. If you look at nintendo all their consoles have names instead of just but a number at end. Personally I have no problem with psp2. It's easy to remember.

Pozzle5589d ago

I like PSP2. It's easy to remember, and tells people who might not know much about gaming consoles (but still want to buy one) what it is: the second Playstation Portable.

DeeZee5589d ago

That makes sense. I'm just thinking if Sony was going to call it that, they would have announced it as the PSP2. But they'll probably call it something else.

Blaine5589d ago

It's a functional name, yes, but I think the problem is that it's just not catchy. "iPod", "Wii", "DS", "Xbox"; they're a lot more catchy than "PlayStation Portable 2". Me, I don't give a damn what it's called, I'll buy one. But for word of mouth viral advertising, a catchy name would help a lot.

Pozzle5589d ago

Eh. Different strokes for different folks. I don't see how PSP2 is any less catchy than any of those names.

And PSP2 makes more sense than NGP when you compare it to Sony's other console names: PS1, PS2, PS3, PSP, etc

xtremexx5589d ago

The Super Ultimate Sub4Sub Ladder Shot Quickscope Flash Grenade Epic Portable Gaming System

Show all comments (53)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
24d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted23d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8523d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele22d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla22d ago (Edited 22d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk22d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay22d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 22d ago
Athlon10123d ago (Edited 23d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit22d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg22d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10122d ago (Edited 22d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14923d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
36d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_36d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle36d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit36d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog36d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog36d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad36d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_36d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage36d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda36d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

36d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong62d ago

looks god awful on the base systems