Dear Editor if your gonna write a review it would nice if you actually played the game. It's obvious that this review was written without any hands on experience.

1. The editor said "One of the selling points of Breach is the destructible environment, but the destruction is somewhat limited, and nowhere near the extend of Red Faction, or Bad Company 2."

You didn't play the game cause if you did you would have said EVERYTHING in Breach can be destroyed if your gun can punch through it or have something else fall on it. Full physics all done in real time with it's built in Physics engine. Hydrogen engine I do believe.

Tossing a grenade unto some giant boulders, boulders falling down the hill and knocking out the houses support beams, broken house now slides down the hill killing the other team dug in behind cover. This is not some scripted event it's done with physics in real time which means the enemy could have hit the boulder with a rpg and shattered it before it hit the house.

2. You think the editor would have mentioned that this was a First Person Shooter with a cover system which is very unique as usually 3PS only offer this.

3. Breach is is more of a TEch Demo of the engine and game-play, the graphics are bland, the controls need work, and over all you will be tired of this game in 2 hours after the enjoyment of blowing stuff up wears off. I think there is only 3 maps, maybe 5.

It seems like this game was released to help generate cash for the completion of Six Days in Fallujah.

Konami screwed up. They could easily cut the Silent Hills ending cutscene and sell it for 5/10 bucks and I would easily buy it again. The demo was tons of fun and terrifying each time, I loved to make friends play

Plot Twist: PT was a tease, Silent Hills was fake, the Konami fallout was staged, and Death Stranding is actually Metal Gear Solid VI. 🤯 #kojimawoulddothis

One of the first casualties of the early outcry mobs.