All Channels
Popular
260°

Sony NGP Vs Nintendo’s 3DS

With the huge announcement overnight, people are deftly excited of Sony’s evolution of the PSP. The Next Gen Portable, or more likely the PSP2, offers everything the original handheld possessed but seemingly improves on it. It sure looks like this is going to be a killer device, but does it have enough steam to take on Nintendo’s reigning champ and its successor to the DS?

Read Full Story >>
gameblurb.net
MicrocutsX25610d ago

Analysts are already wary about the NGP, but I really hope it turns out to take down the Nintendo handheld. They've held it for generations. =/

liquidxtension5610d ago

Ngp has a lot of good first party and third party support from the get go. Don't cound it out yet.

zootang5610d ago (Edited 5610d ago )

FPS on the go could be the big game changer.

Call of duty or any decent FPS on the go will win the battle for Sony, offices and playgrounds would be gripped.

Fifa in the Europe could also win the battle for Sony

Anarki5610d ago

The 2 thumb sticks is where it's at i'm afraid. I hated my PSP because of the crappy D pad and the lack of a 2nd thumb stick. This will be epic for me.

jony_dols5610d ago (Edited 5610d ago )

If Sony could get some celebrity who is a core gamer,
and get them to appear in some of their ads. It would be the perfect way to sell NGP units.

Sony have the better console, all they need to do is market it properly.

I'm sure if they could get someone like Seth Rogen playing COD online on a movie set in middle of the Mojave desert against Kevin Butler in his office in Sony HQ, and have them trash talking against each other would be hilarious,

or maybe David Beckham playing FIFA in the back of his Bentley on the way to a match,
It would help flog it to the gullible masses who buy stuff because of celebrity endorsements.

SuperStrokey11235610d ago

I hope it doesnt take it down, i hope it drives further competition and makes games and systems cheaper for all gamers.

-Superman-5610d ago

NGP:
- 2 Thumbsticks
- Excellent hardware
- HD screen
- Online capabilities. (better than shityy online on ds)
- Big Screen

3DS
- 3D without glasses

Now i have 1 question. Is 3D worth all this? no big screen, bad grahpic...?

crazyclown5610d ago

u mean bad 3d without glasses right?

meetajhu5610d ago

╲╭┳━━━━━━━━━━━┳╮╱
╭┻╯┏━━━━━━━━━┓╰┻╮
┃╭╮┃┈☆ⒽⒺⓁⓁⓄ☆┈┃△◯┃
┃╰╯┃┈★ⓌⓄⓇⓁⒹ★┈┃▢╳┃
┃∭◉┃┈Ⓢ┈Ⓞ┈Ⓝ┈Ⓨ┈┃◉┅┃
╰┳♺┗━━▃ⓃⒼⓟ▃━━┛╭┳╯
╱╰┻━━━▬▬▬▬▬━━━┻WINS

BrunoM5610d ago

the way i see it is they go by history and they think psp ds nintendo won ... not look at ps3 wii see things do change (not putting the wii and the ps3 at the same level tho )

Well as for me is a day one buy and even if some of us dont like it FPS do sell like hot cakes and COD is number one at being a hot cake so dual analog plus COD is going to sell ...

if the games keep coming hardcore games (for players like me)
plus casual downloaded game (for casual and small time gamers) these is a win ...

not to say the 3ds wont sell it will nintendo is nintendo on on the go gaming .. but i see sony doing great these gen on PSP2 i mean NGP lol....

as for me i will get it on the day it comes out cant wait for E3 so i get to see tons of games il be getting plus the date..

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5610d ago
golsilva5610d ago (Edited 5610d ago )

it comes down to 2 things. the price and advertising. if the price is a $300 for the wifi only model, then sony definitely has mass market appeal in terms of pricing, because they can justify paying $50 more than the 3ds by saying how many features more you get with the psp2.

for advertisement, want to know why apple is so successful with their products. whether you like them or not,they know how to advertise their products the right way. sony needs to market this device in the right by targeting the right demographic, and keeping the ads simple and to the point. to have a successful launch, they would ideally advertise call of duty psp2 game heavily in the us along with uncharted and mh3 in japan (though i dont know if thats a possible launch title)

saint_john_paul_ii5610d ago

well advertising is going to be there. Sony is obviously going to have a huge marketing campaign for this, so what it comes down to is GAMES and PRICE.

If they bring in a hefty amount of games that take advantage of the portable, built from the ground up for it, and a price tag that is around $250-$300, then this thing will sell like hotcakes.

jaidek5610d ago

Man, going to go broke this year. I will have to get both, the 3DS for the screen and NGP for on-the-go Uncharted and Killzone!

NBT915610d ago

I agree, the 3DS is coming out in like a month and is (probably) going to cost less, at least by the time this comes out it will if not. That gives people plenty of time to buy a 3DS and save for NGP if they want both.

Bay5610d ago

Why not get both? Best of both worlds, eh.

Although personally, I think I'd be getting the NGP first. Nintendo might release a "lite" version of the 3DS, who knows.

junk3d5610d ago

Yeah I carry about 1 grand in my pocket everyday!/s

Bay5610d ago

Get one now, get another later. You don't have to get both at the same time.....unless you do carry 1 grand in your pocket everyday.

TheBand1t5610d ago

Because shit is expensive, yo

Shackdaddy8365610d ago

I wish I can get both but unfortunately I'm just a college kid with no job.

Ive got savings and maybe a low paying job during the summer but other than that I am broke. I can only pay for one handheld (which unfortunately may come down to which one I can afford) and a couple of games.

Denethor_II5610d ago

"Why not get both? Best of both worlds, eh. "

The dedicated amongst most certainly will, but we are the minority.

NBT915610d ago (Edited 5610d ago )

If you ask me the fact that PS3 launched at almost £500 makes pretty much any price tag seem low. I will be getting both, it is only money after all so if you have it then be a capitalist and buy both, if not then get a different less expensive hobby.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5610d ago
Kiroe5610d ago

Something that worries me on the NGP is the cost of 3G, I really hope that they do an affordable annual subscription. Something like $50 a year would be perfect.

joeorc5610d ago (Edited 5610d ago )

there is some devices where 3G connection is free an included in the price.

example:

Free 3G Wireless – No monthly payments, no annual contracts

Kindle-Wireless-Reader-3G-Q

it's $139.00 to $189.00 with free 3G connectivity

/wink

Arksine5610d ago

Those devices dont use much bandwidth. Don't count on that happening with the NGP. Between online gaming, PSN downloads, and updates this device will incur a monthly cost on par with smartphones, minus the voice. Probably around $40 a month with a 5GB cap.

I can see Sony going with a carrier that offers prepaid 3G considering the demographic...pay per GB instead of per month. That might be more cost effective. People would just make sure that PSN downloads and updates are done over WiFi and save the data for gaming and social tasks when away from home.

joeorc5610d ago

yea i know what your saying, since EVERY NGP would already have Wifi a 3G connected NGP would be able to game over Wifi anyway. what Sony could offer is a small fee per month to game over the 3G connection other wise you could still use it for non gaming application's. so the 3G could be free but just for non gaming use, if you want to game over the 3G connection you would have to pay a fee.

Show all comments (61)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
42d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted41d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8541d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele41d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk40d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay40d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 40d ago
Athlon10141d ago (Edited 41d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit40d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg40d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10140d ago (Edited 40d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14941d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
54d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_54d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle54d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker54d ago (Edited 54d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit54d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog54d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_54d ago (Edited 54d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog54d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad54d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_54d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage54d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda54d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

54d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong80d ago

looks god awful on the base systems