All Channels
Popular
170°

PSP2: How Far Will Great Specs Get Sony?

Mugampi.com writes "The PSP2 is due to be announced in two days (January 27th) and a lot of stuff is leaking about it having 3G and an OLED touch screen. Plus we’ve heard ramblings about it being pretty powerful. All this sounds great, but how far will great specs get Sony?"

Pixel_Enemy5597d ago

I have had enough of these criticizing PSP2 articles.. I am ready to spend $200- $250 on this handheld right now. Unveil it already and my cash is yours!

DeFFeR5597d ago

My only complaint - How in the world doesn't this ship with 3G AND 4G capabilities?

Sure, games may not utilize the 4G until the spread of the towers and equipment is more vast, but to have that ability would drastically increase it's marketability and technological lifetime.

ONLY complaint. This is similar (...kinda) to the 360 including the DVD instead of HD format disc drive. Old tech doesn't belong in "cutting edge" new products.

Nathaniel_Drake5597d ago

ONLY complaint. This is similar (...kinda) to the 360 including the DVD instead of HD format disc drive. Old tech doesn't belong in "cutting edge" new products

Well the 3DS doesn't have 4G, so there really isn't any competition, to push Sony to include this. The PSP will still be the best in this situation.

TreMillz5597d ago

simple 360 isnt cutting edge technology hence y its still using dvd

DeFFeR5597d ago

The fact that the 3DS doesn't have 4G is exactly why the PSP2 SHOULD have it. The technology is there (much like HD-DVD and Blu-Ray were available when MS produced the 360).

Separate itself from the competition.

EYEamNUMBER15597d ago (Edited 5597d ago )

"I am ready to spend $200- $250"
come on now lets get real here that price is nothing but a dream

Ju5597d ago

Seeing a Moto Xoom for $699 and possibly a PSP2 toping those specs $250 can only be possible with some sort of a contract. Maybe that's why they included 3G. Using it as a feature and to subsidize cost. $600 without (maybe that sound pessimistic, but I don't know why a Samsung Tab costs that much either).

WhiteNoise5597d ago

The PSP sold for like $399 on launch day...

$250 is B.S. You'd be lucky to get one for under $500 for the first 6 months.

Or you could just get a second job to pay for one ;)

Masterchef20075597d ago (Edited 5597d ago )

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

Do a little bit of research before stating those facts..

"PSP would go on sale in North America on March 24, 2005, in one configuration for a MSRP of US$249/CA$299."

firefoxprime5597d ago

Uhh....which country are "you" from?

Because I remember the psp selling for $250USD.

WhiteNoise5597d ago

@Masterchef2007/Firefox

I don't care what the RRP is , shops were selling them for much much higher than that for a long time. The PSP go sold for $250 when it launch ffs...a rehash....for $250...

Hairy Chewie5597d ago

Pretty sure it launched for $400 in Australia. I'd pay that again for the PSP2 as long as it's got two nubs and a touch screen.

kulex475597d ago

White Noise, I don't know what country your from but I bought the Original PSP 1000 and was there at GameStop at midnight and would have slapped the zit faced teenager if he'd said anything like 400 bucks, it was 249...

Perkel5597d ago (Edited 5597d ago )

And starting pracie for Ps2 was 299 in 2000.

Starting price for ps3 was 599$ so i think it'll be 499 or 450$.

If it would come with phone i would sell my iphone for new PSP2

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5597d ago
scofios5597d ago

It isn't even official announced yet , why all that hate ? at least hold your horsess till you see the thing in action .

HolyOrangeCows5597d ago

I can't believe that we're STILL seeing all of these articles based off of the rumors. Random "INZIDER SAUCE!" #530948765807645 says that the PSP2 will be as powerful as the PS3, and these morons believe it?

It was a random lie to get hits to a small, uninteresting game site. And now it has exploded into this.

lil Titan5597d ago

Criticism happens to all great people and products. Funny how i dont remember any for 360, so what does that say?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5597d ago
Wildarmsjecht5597d ago

How far will great specs get Sony?

Dunno. What have they confirmed so far? Nothing? Really? I could've been fooled with the amount of articles on the subject thus far.

I'll wait a couple of days and get my info then.

JoeReno5597d ago

Smart man. I guess the 99¢ store is selling crystal balls now-a-days the way every one is seeing into the future.

ApocalypseShadow5597d ago

FAR enough to get ME to buy it.

is that FAR enough?

WhiteNoise5597d ago

If the PSP and PS3 are anything to go by, they will get Sony in the red for the first few years then they will still be in second place to Nintendo; in both the home console and handheld.

It must be tiring constantly copying Nintendo tech to try and stay relevant.

QQ?

ugabugaz5597d ago

This is what I want from the PSP2.
1) A really beutiful exterior (Think Fat PS3, Original PSP, I love how they both look)

2)OLED screen with a decently high enough resolution

3) Two sticks

You got my money.
I still have my PSP-1000 in pristine condition.

Show all comments (39)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
26d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted25d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8525d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele25d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla25d ago (Edited 25d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk25d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay24d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 24d ago
Athlon10125d ago (Edited 25d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit24d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg24d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10124d ago (Edited 24d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14925d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
38d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_38d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle38d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit38d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog38d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog38d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad38d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_38d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage38d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda38d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

38d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong64d ago

looks god awful on the base systems