All Channels
Popular
220°

LittleBigPlanet Backwards Compatibility

Media Molecule: With LittleBigPlanet 2 launching this week, we thought now would be a good time to talk in more detail about the backwards compatibility between the new game and your current creations.

Read Full Story >>
mediamolecule.com
Godmars2905599d ago

Know I'll get flamed for saying it, but its the truth.

Its DLC and patches, but the thing is its too much DLC and patches. If it were put out as DLC and patches it would be a few gigs. Would be too much just justify between free and paid, with no way to count on *everyone* getting it so that everyone could then play everyone else's levels.

ForceCSW5599d ago

It's rather amusing how far from the truth you are.

Beefstew4u5599d ago

Agreed, there is no denying that lbp2 is essentially just a giant DLC pack. However, in addition to the reason you listed above, the other issue for why it needed to be released as a new game is popularity and the number of people who still play it. If this was released as even a $5 DLC pack, odds are it would not sell very well, as lbp came out in 2007. Anyone who still plays it (such as myself) can tell you that the number of active players in the game has seriously dropped over the past year or two. The main point of lbp2 is to get millions more players on the game so that they can sell more future and past DLC packs, as well as disc copies of the game.

It's been almost 4 years since the original lbp was released, and lbp2 is simply a way to renew interest in a slowly dying game.

Godmars2905599d ago

Beefstew4u is closer to the truth than you are.

The real sad annoying truth is that because LBP is the game that it is, people feel entitled to free DLC that could have been worth $40-$60 or more. The actual tools needed to make free player made levels which MM is under no obligation to simply hand out.

jammydude5598d ago

Literally the silliest thing I've heard on here all day. So by your logic, every sequel "is DLC and patches"
-new graphics engine
-new single player
-many new features
-re-thought MP. and community aspect
You expect WAYYYY too much of game companies. Oh and to the idiot claiming there's hardly anyone playing LBP anymore. There have been 1.5 million levels made in the last year alone. Obviously noone playing it

derp.

zeksta5598d ago

Judging by what you've just typed, I'd say you haven't even tried the game, it has too many new features to even imagine, Yes, you are playing other people's level's, but the amount of creativity and content you can make is endless, saying that it's a DLC is moronic as we already know you are anyway.

But the fact is, this is not a DLC but in-fact a new game, a new game that everyone on the PS3 will surely have soon.

Godmars2905598d ago

Picked it up day one. Its a massive DLC patch for a great game that's three years old. Also nothing that MM should be ashamed of putting out, if not for gamers who feel like they're entitled.

Beefstew4u5598d ago

*sigh*

I'm not knocking the game or anything, I'm just pointing out that the game was only released to renew interest in it so that MM can continue to make a living. Just like the Pirates of the Caribbean and MGS dlc packs that added water, the paintinator, and new ojects and stickers, all of the new features in lbp2 could have been released as DLC.
Some of the in-game community aspects were supposed to be included in lbp (such as play, create, share points) but never worked and were eventually taken out of the game. LBP2 essentially just fixes the problems that the first game had, while adding new creation and gameplay tools that could have easily been released as dlc (just like the paintinator and water). However, it wouldn't make sense for them to release all of that content as DLC.
Like Godmars stated, there would be too much content to release just as DLC, and the amount of packs that would be required, and the size of all of them would be too extreme. Obviously their best choice was to release a new version of the game with all of these new features included in it. This decision also allows them to reinvigorate the online community of an aging game, and allow them to make more money from new disc sales and increased demand for new DLC packs.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5598d ago
acky15599d ago ShowReplies(1)
Redempteur5599d ago

Still no word if my GOTY edition will have everything transported in LBP2 ?

garrod5599d ago (Edited 5599d ago )

I got LBP2 and it does transfer your saved data your DLC and any levels you've created over from the first game. I had the GOTY edition of LBP 1 as well and had no problems editing my levels and what not in 2 now. Love it so much!! It's a great game go get it!

Redempteur5599d ago

thanks ! i was worried as that was n't working in the beta .Glad they fixed it

Kon5599d ago

I love MM's site design.

Show all comments (20)
210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel740d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga739d ago (Edited 739d ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow739d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo182739d ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie738d ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow738d ago (Edited 738d ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

738d ago
Hereandthere738d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 738d ago
Notellin738d ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

738d ago
Hereandthere738d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow737d ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere738d ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow737d ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX739d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney737d ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody739d ago (Edited 739d ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno739d ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Sheppard2739d ago

How did Sony kill the series?

Inverno739d ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

738d ago
fsfsxii738d ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno738d ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)
320°

Most Offensive Video Games That Would Never Cut It Today

Times are changing, and these games would have never been made in today's climate.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com
thorstein792d ago (Edited 792d ago )

Every single time someone uses this phrase whether it's music, movies, books, comics, video games, etc it's always the same claim.

The ubiquitous "they" won't allow it to be made. And every decade these claims are made the claimant completely ignores all the "offensive" material that is published when the claim is made.

In ten years, you can write a new article about how you can't make games like Helldivers 2, Resident Evil VIII, Mortal Kombat I, Dragon's Dogma 2, Alan Wake 2 etc etc etc any more.

MrBaskerville791d ago

Yeah, people wouldn't be constantly outraged if there weren't games that people found enraging. The whole SBI discourse shit wouldn't be a thing if all games were inoffensive. A game like Starfield can make a guy froth at his mouth, so there will always be room for a list like this.

0hMyGandhi791d ago

Normally, I'd be inclined to agree with you, but there are massive caveats.
TV shows like Venture Bros, Ren and Stimpy, and Aqua Team wouldn't/couldn't be made today. Hell, Ren and Stimpy was a *children's* show, same thing with Rocko's Modern Life.

It's not for some arbitrary reason, either. It's branding and IP alignment. Companies are far more risk-averse than they were when I was kid in the 90's. Of course, you have companies coming out of the woodwork to hell spur on similar content, but remember: Cartoon Network and Nickelodeon and some incredibly provocative material.

And for movies? it's pretty obvious. American Pie/Wedding Crashers/Eurotrip among many other "raunch coms" have fallen out of style, and are absolutely outside what the modern day film industry is willing to stand by.
Ace Ventura 1 and 2, Dumb and Dumber, Freddy Got Fingered, Rat Race, Harold and Kumar, and Van Wilder follow suit.

Remember: I am not explicitly talking about films put onto streamers. I am talking wide-releases in actual theaters. Same thing goes for games: Carmageddon, Duke Nukem, Manhunt, Six Days In Fallujah (with their original concept), Hatred, and so on and so forth. Of course, I'd be inclined to mention most tactical shooters like Rainbow Six and Joint Ops as well, due to cultural sensitivity regarding *who* you are shooting and why.

And not all of it is bad (obviously). Tastes change, and perspectives change to fit the demographic.
I should add that I'm a lefty, living in L.A. Working in film.

thorstein791d ago

The Boys, Invincible, Jojo Rabbit, Deadpool, Gen V, Last of Us, Banshee... There are plenty of media being made today that people will claim "can't be made today".

Profchaos791d ago

Yeah but if you consider manhunt which was basically a snuff film could you seriously make that game with high than PS2 era graphics.

thorstein790d ago

The Outlast Trials just came out.

But the storyline of Manhunt was that you were executed. But then lived. And if you didn't do as you were told, you'd die. And the people you killed were not innocents.

It was all filmed by a psychopath.

As we speak GTA VI is being finished up for a release. You get to play a Bonnie and Clyde type of protagonist who run up against the law.

Bodycam looks so real.

People are making those games. Articles like this will always exist no matter how incorrect they are, no matter how many times they blame "them" for whatever it is "they" do to prevent "those" games from being made.

ZycoFox791d ago

The UK is the biggest junk country pandering to that nonsense as well, with laws against free speech and expression to match. It got so bad even Rowan Atkinson made a video on free speech about it.

Now the UK raises the age rating on harmless films like Mary Poppins, it's just a load of pansy weak ass nonsense.

MrDead791d ago (Edited 791d ago )

The right wing Tories have been in power in the UK for the 14 years you know the ones that are "anti-woke", blame them for your perceptions.

Killer2020UK791d ago (Edited 791d ago )

Are these snowflakes in the room with us now?

This is more faux outrage designed to get hits. The consequences are unfortunately creating hysteria amongst those willing to buy into it and blame "them" or "the left" or "liberals" meanwhile the left are kicking off about genocide, actual real world abhorrent acts. Nobody is campaigning to censor this shit.

Huey_My_D_Long791d ago

Not too mention the fact that some of these game are controversial for you know, underage porn and encouraging rape.

So either the guy just came in to comment snowflakes without reading anything, or he is calling people snowflakes for having a problem with said titles. Crazy how much brain rot someone can have.

banger88792d ago

Dead Island: "The early PC version of the zombie game swapped the playable character Purna’s Gender Wars skill with a prototype name, which shouldn’t be mentioned directly. The skill name made fun of both Purna as a character and feminists."

"Feminist Whore" lmao

gold_drake791d ago

ill add one more to the list.
drakengard 1.

its ridiculous tho, especially since they'd still be able to find their place in alot of places in the world. except america of course ha. and maybe Australia.

ppl are so sensitive these days. ha. but it is what it is.

Barlos791d ago (Edited 791d ago )

They're not offensive.

And we need another Fat Princess. Fantastic little game!

Some people just have no sense of humour if this sort of thing offends them. They need to lighten up and stop taking themselves so seriously.

Deeeeznuuuts791d ago

Would love a new fat princess game 🤟

CantThinkOfAUsername791d ago

Games literally about sexual assault, mass genocide, bombing civilians, and school shooting. None of which is satirical.

isarai791d ago

Actually it's about fat princesses

Huey_My_D_Long791d ago (Edited 791d ago )

Its crazy that people are fixated on Fat princess when clearly the list is going over controversies, and not all of them are equal. Like way worse examples but pretend the entire list is like that.

Show all comments (37)
120°

Dead Space Isaac Clarke: Every Cameo in Other Games

Isaac Clarke of Dead Space fame has appeared in many games, both as a playable character and an Easter Egg. Have you played them all?