Again?

Using a newer engine with older assets isn't really going to get you a performance or graphical boost.

Much like how looking at a Word 95 document in in Office 2007 doesn't look any different.

Having said that, they look pretty identical. I'll wait for the Digital Foundry comparrison, they at least explain their findings.

Who cares. It's not like it's some huge graphical difference..it's a good game play it for whichever system you prefer.

so now the SDF can shut there bigmouths and stop rubbing there worthless opinions down our throats and trolling 360 articles

Didnt IGN already prove the PS3 version looks better?

this is a like a lame attempt to prove the xbox versions better at one thing ...seriously a waste of time

Question: do any of you decide whether or not to purchase a game based on the presence of a few jaggies, overly dark textures, or slightly less than optimal lighting? Because if so, thats just sad.

"Having played well into the game, the overall feeling is that both versions have their ups and downs during the run of play, especially in the interactive cut-scenes, where the sudden jarring differences in frame-rate are perhaps most noticeable. However, it is difficult to avoid the conclusion that the original Xbox 360 version of Mass Effect 2 has a performance advantage overall, especially during the exploration and combat sections."

"From a technical perspective, if it is running the Mass Effect 3 engine as the developer suggests, players are not getting any tangible advantages over what has already been released on the Xbox 360. BioWare's heavily modified Unreal Engine 3 probably did require a substantial overhaul to accommodate the Sony platform for the multi-format Mass Effect 3, so it would have made sense to use that work for the ME2 conversion rather than simply port over the existing 360 code. However, this does not manifest in a better game as the marketing seems to be suggesting."

"Technically there is not much of a case for any claims of being "definitive", but perhaps the statement should be judged in terms of content, in the way that a Game of the Year edition of a game might be considered definitive."

"Between the consoles, the gap narrows. Technologically it still feels like the Xbox 360 version has the edge, but occasionally lower frame-rates and mostly unnoticeable graphical compromises on PS3 are not going to have much impact on the fun you have playing this game. Scored today, this would still be a 10/10 game on both platforms."

360 is the better version.Bioware were talking of their ass to sell you a one year old game

Thats digital foundry who said that as well.The guys we like

http://n4g.com/news/682652/...

The videos a saw on IGN the graphics was somewhat better on PS3 but on all other sites it almost 50/50. Anyway who cares, the gameplay is the best part of a game and graphics is just a bonus.

other than the lighting and colors being slightly different everything else looks pretty much the same.

ps3 version looks better:)