Okay, I 'unno if the game's "good" or not, but dear god, that has to be one of the most bad-written, immature reviews I've read in a long, long while.

Yes, even worse than the God Hand IGN's review.

Not only it uses acronyms everywhere, but lacks proper punctuation in certain parts of it. Moreover, it seems more like a rant about how the game isn't a typical shootan gaem and instead goes for something more...ehm, unique (? [bear in mind, I do not even plan on touching this game]).

What's really the most stupid thing, though, is that he only played the game for a few minutes, then proceeded to give a completly childish rant. How old is the reviewer, 12?

Come on.

Play the game and you'll see. How about you go out and spend $60 on Mindjack and come up with a better conclusion.

I hope the reviewers are wrong about Mindjack as they were for Nier

Remember square still makes money from this because they arent the developer of this piece of shit

ill buy it when it gets bargain binned then..ign gave it crap as well

To me, Duke Nukem was playability at least. Most movie games were more intolerable than that.

I remember being really excited for Alien Colonial Marines, until I checked the review scores.....

Huh? No Sonic Boom?

Thankfully I never bought any in the list :)