All Channels
Popular
420°

Sony PS3 Hacker To Argue That He 'Re-Enabled' Feature

Lawyers representing George Hotz, the individual accused of illegally hacking the Sony PlayStation 3, claim that Hotz did so to add back a feature that Sony had removed.

Hotz, the lawyers claimed, "re-enabled" OtherOS functionality, or the ability to dual-boot the PlayStation 3 using some other OS, such as Linux.

deadreckoning6665606d ago (Edited 5606d ago )

I think u missed the point of what hes doing. By stating that he "re-enabled", hes trying to make it seem as if Sony was the bad guy for taking the "OtherOS" feature away.

This isn't about piracy, its about setting a precedent for what people are allowed to do with what they buy with THEIR OWN money....in this case, the PS3. The problem is that the Sony cheerleaders are N4G are to stupid to realize it.

Geohot's lawyers are fighting for YOUR rights.

@nycredude- What would you do if u were in his position? Its almost as if you WANT to see him lose this case, which is odd seeing as how he's fighting for the rights of console owners.

Lets say I want to hack my PS3...but I have NO intention of piracy. Why should I not I have right to do that with the $600 system that I bought?

@GrieverSoul- I'd go to Ms. Smith's home while Mr. Smith isn't there, seduce her...and coerce her into giving me fruits and vegatables in exchange for sex.

silkrevolver5606d ago (Edited 5606d ago )

I just want Sony to be able to keep making games... I don’t give a crap about what Geohot is fighting for.

(Side note: I edited my original comment because I decided I didn’t want to directly attack anybody, just fyi.)

GrieverSoul5606d ago

@deadreckoning666

Imagine if you buy your fruit and vegetables on Mr. Smith shop. Now, by accident you found his werehouse and you start "taking" your fruits and vegetables from there without paying. What will Mr. Smith do?! He will close his shop and shut down his werehouse. Now, where will you go for fruits and vegetables??!!

showtimefolks5606d ago

its about the money you think given the option the person who hacked ps3 wouldn't not to make a ton of money?

make some sense i hope he goes to prison

end of the day do what ever you want with your PS3 BUT WHEN YOU RELEASE THAT INFO ON THE NET YOU DOING SOMETHING WRONG

If i buy a TV than install new features than start to sell it and say i have enabled new features?

SuicideShaun5606d ago

Because they are corporations, they spend time and money on making something they way they want it. Take changing the ui on a system for example. People do it on phones etc, but somewhere along the line the company paid a guy a lot of money to make it, and then you just change it. That makes it still in a pirate sense. You shouldn't be able to just change things to they way you want it. That's not the point of community on a product. Let them change things and just let it be.

Killzoned5606d ago

But then again thats another way of an excuse to get out of trouble and say that he wasn't hacking the PS3

Be serious, GeoHotz wanted the use the OtherOs, Fighting for OUR RIGHTS? are you serious

ZombieNinjaPanda5606d ago

@GrieverSoul

Wouldn't a better example be that you find seeds and plant your own garden and stop buying from him?

NewMonday5606d ago

Sure for the "right" to play games for free, and destroy online games with cheats. Nevermind the rights of thousands of game developers who work hard to make these games.

StbI9905606d ago

To microsoft shop, since h's is such a xbot.

PimpHandHappy5606d ago

if you buy a gun with your own money that does not give you the right to go shoot it off in public even if the ppl that made it made it so it can

Proxy5606d ago (Edited 5606d ago )

I would guess most game developers hope Geo wins, because this really is about hacker/programmer rights. Most here don't have the ability to program; they just want to spend their pay check and sit on the couch playing video games. They don't care.

For those with the ability to write software, and control the hardware; I'm sure they'd appreciate the right to do so.

I wouldn't call myself a game developer, but I have created a text based chess game with a godly AI which I've never defeated - it was more a study of AI than game design. I really enjoy programming and I'd love to be able to write applications to run on the PS3.

If there are any programmers who do supports the Sony "closed-platform" agenda, speak up.

Kran5606d ago

Yes. I do want him to lose.

Nothing good can some from an illegal hack. Its Sony's decision what they want enabled and disabled, not somebody who does not even work for Sony. If he is doing something only Sony should do, it's as if he is working for sony. ILLEGALLY!

InTheLab5606d ago (Edited 5606d ago )

Our troops are fighting for our rights. This kid is just doing this for attention. A complete waste of a brilliant mind....

Christopher5606d ago (Edited 5606d ago )

***This isn't about piracy, its about setting a precedent for what people are allowed to do with what they buy with THEIR OWN money....in this case, the PS3. The problem is that the Sony cheerleaders are N4G are to stupid to realize it. ***

I can buy a gun with my own money, it's still illegal to shoot people with it.

In the same vein, he can hack his machine all he wants, but what he's being taken to court for is a) Releasing the meltdr information, which is Sony IP, not his and b) distributing software that modifies PSN code, which is, again, Sony IP.

If he had just modified his machine to enable it for him, that would be great and he'd be okay. But, instead he obtained secure software data that wasn't his to utilize, used it to further modify software that isn't his to modify and then shared it with everyone on the Web.

Hotz didn't do this just because he wanted it, though. He did it because he thinks Sony had no right to force him to choose between OtherOS and PSN. The problem is, in doing so he violated Sony's IP in the exact same way that he feels they violated his right to have both PSN and OtherOS.

The case isn't about whether he's a hacker or not -- though there is needed evidence to show that he is a hacker and has gotten donations from such actions -- but about what information he used and who's programs he modified in order to achieve his goal of hacking.

If he had kept his PS3 at the same level with OtherOS, he could have added everything he wanted to his machine without problem. But, he wasn't content with what he said his original goals were. He wanted it all, regardless of what it meant to the company that provided the hardware and software in the first place.

***What would you do if u were in his position?***

I wouldn't be in his position. I wouldn't have shared information that I know would have lead to piracy on the console.

***Its almost as if you WANT to see him lose this case, which is odd seeing as how he's fighting for the rights of console owners.***

How so? The right to ignore Sony's IP is what he is fighting for. PSN and the meltdr keys are Sony's IP, yet he didn't feel at all bad about sharing them and modifying their code.

You're saying I'm supposed to get behind someone who would have no issues taking my code and modifying to his own needs and then openly distributing it even though I rely upon said code for my business? Yeah, you'll be waiting a while for me to line up behind him.

***Lets say I want to hack my PS3...but I have NO intention of piracy. Why should I not I have right to do that with the $600 system that I bought?***

1) Because the software is not your IP.
2) Because he didn't just modify his hardware, he found sensitive Sony IP, distributed it to the Web, and modified their software IP.

By your logic, why shouldn't people have the right to hack video games? Why should they be penalized for said actions at all? It's their software now that they own it and they can do what they want with it.

You see, this isn't a hardware issue, it's all about the software.

MajestieBeast5606d ago (Edited 5606d ago )

@Dead

So you think the software inside the ps3 belongs to the consumer and they should be able to alter it and distribute it? You know how stupid it sounds to defend this way of thinking right? The problem in it all is that he didnt keep it to himself and published copyrighted software like the privacy key on the internet.

His custom firmware is also illegal its not new code its just firmware 3.55 modified a little.
It still has the same look as the normal xmb which is also a copyright by Sony. So he isnt fighting for my rights cause i know the software inside my ps3 isnt mine. I got a license to use it but i cant go altering it and then posting it on internet.

elmaton985606d ago

My rights. MY FUCKING RIGHTS. I would've still have my otherOS if it wasn't for this fucker hackers in the first place. It wouldn't have gotten to this if it wasn't for them. In the beginning of every technology, everything is good until hackers come and make it better or worst

SeanScythe5606d ago

Are you a fucking moron? Doing this for My Rights?! Yeah and ruining gaming for everyone. Sony couldn't careless what he does with his PS3 but when you start trying to Cheat the system and break the games with Hacks and Mods then you are at fault and should be punished.

OMG you actually think he is fighting for peoples rights? How stupid are you? Go back to smoking your bong and playing with yourself.

Omegasyde5606d ago

@Deadreckoning

Every post you make is very deluded. Do you actually use the same rational in real life? And is 100% about piracy, why else would Sony care? WoW.

P.S. Sony could counter argue they took other O.S. out because of Geohot because he was hacking it before they removed it.

NeoBasch5606d ago (Edited 5606d ago )

That's a bunch of bullocks. I've been programming for six years now. There's no way I would ever want something like this. There's a reason companies hire programmers to design a security system to prevent people like him from mucking everything up for everyone else.

Besides, most students have to sign an agreement with faculty and staff that they will not misuse penetration techniques they learn from network security classes: it's called ethics, and reaches beyond the classroom environment. This guy lacks them. He should know better.

EDIT: You should try designing Checkers through web scripting. That's tough. Using languages like C and C++ makes things much easier, but controlling image placement with CSS and Javascript is a nightmare. If you feel up to it, try to program an algorithm where the computer will know if the user can make a SAFE double, triple, or quadruple jump. Now that's hard.

ThanatosDMC5606d ago

My rights? Dont you mean his ass? He's just trying to save his ass that's it. Not to mention he's going to ruin my rights to play MAG the way it's intended.

Thoreau5606d ago

dead...

how is it possible that you are wrong on so many different posts.....

geohotz lawyer is not fighting for my rights. you can do whatever you want with your ps3 but distribute copyrighted software. beat a game and you will see legal info after the credits. geohotz did not do this to help us but instead desired to make his mark on the ps3 by hacking it to download and play stolen software..

this is the reason why the other os system was removed...

HolyOrangeCows5606d ago

"I think u missed the point of what hes doing. By stating that he "re-enabled", hes trying to make it seem as if Sony was the bad guy for taking the "OtherOS" feature away"

So, basically, he's a delusional nut (Who copied, tampered, and distributed copy-protected codes and software) who thinks he's in the right?

Thanks for getting me up to speed.
/s

GeoNot's thinks he can avoid the law by making Sony out to be a bad guy. That's cute. I remember when I was 5 and thought that you could steal a candy bar from someone who was mean. (Inb4 "Last week?")

+ Show (18) more repliesLast reply 5606d ago
nycredude5606d ago

Dead

Seriously if this is his defence then its obvious his case doesn't have a leg to stand on.

Balt are you really that dense?

Thecraft19895606d ago (Edited 5606d ago )

LoL he won the case

As of 2:00 PM EST, 1/14/2011, I am not subject to any TROs

http://geohot.com/

The judge basically listen to both sides and said NEXT !

WOW disagree for stating facts N4G at its best.

LOL 2 more do people not know the definition of disagree you can't disagree with a fact lol

Nineball21125606d ago

He didn't win anything... LOL The case hasn't been dismissed or heard either.

The judge is postponing it to decide if her court is the right venue for the lawsuit.

Quote: "U.S. District Judge Susan Illston, without deciding any of the merits of Sony’s DMCA claim and other allegations, said she was unsure whether the lawsuit should even be tried in her courtroom. She wondered aloud whether the case should be aired in the 21-year-old’s home state of New Jersey, where the hacking took place."

http://www.wired.com/threat...

Persistantthug5606d ago (Edited 5606d ago )

until the judge figures out if she wants to take the case or not.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5606d ago
otherZinc5606d ago

I hope SONY sues the pants off this Sombitch & send a definite message to the rest of the pirates.

Seriously, @ssholes like this clown robs developers of their work & make us pay more at retail.

F*** this dude! SONY, make this Sombitches life miserable!

meetajhu5606d ago (Edited 5606d ago )

I pray to god every night that Geohot wins and saves millions of lives and gives profit to Sony by selling PS3's!

NeoBasch5606d ago

Even if he helps sell more PS3's, how's that help the developers? Third party developers will flock to the 3DS and PSP 2. At least then they won't be under the threat of piracy... until those are cracked as well.

Main_Street_Saint5606d ago

Really!? I'm going to pretend you just typed that in the heat of stupidity.

klashawnd5606d ago

@GrieverSoul What if you bought fruits and vegetables from Mr. Smith's shop and then the Mr. Smith came back and took some of the vegetables even though you had already paid for them? Then you found out you could get them back by going around the shop and getting them directly from the fruit truck instead? Then Mr. Smith sues you for taking back what you had already paid for?

xX-PEIN-Xx5606d ago

What if Mr. Smith took them back because they were contaminated and you would die if you consumed them?

palaeomerus5606d ago

" What if Mr. Smith took them back because they were contaminated and you would die if you consumed them? "

Then the analogy would be so stupid that it would not apply to anything in this case.

Main_Street_Saint5606d ago

What do Fruits and Veggies have to do with hacking PS3's? It is a rather stupid analogy.

Main_Street_Saint5606d ago

What do fruits and veggies have to do with hacking PS3's? Rather silly analogy, really.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5606d ago
MNicholas5606d ago

Just as knowingly causing financial damage to a person by distributing someone's social security number is considered illegal, doing the same to a business is also illegal.

Geohot is knowingly damaging not just one business, but many (including many 3rd party developers who are already struggling to stay afloat), and by releasing this information to the public, he has broken the law.

Hacking a PS3 or any console is not, in itself, illegal. Distributing the key that allows others to hack it is damaging to business and illegal.

beavis4play5606d ago (Edited 5606d ago )

fu%K - hotz is making up lies as he goes along. if this is the case - he'd better have proof.
and even if he has proof - the feature he's trying to add is one sony removed because HOTZ was using it to hack the console and compromise it's security.

mantisimo5606d ago

To all above, Mr Smith has has never sold vegetables he is an online Porn Baron that specialises in veg shaped love toys.

On Topic didnt little Georgy h start his hacking of the PS3 through the "other OS feature" in the first place prompting Sony to ditch it?

Man In Black5606d ago

This asshole is the reason OtherOS was removed in the first place.

awesomeperson5606d ago

B-b-but hez fighting for teh rights and to give teh consumer their features!

/s

I.
Hate.
Him.

palaeomerus5606d ago

No, SONY is the reason OtherOS was removed. Geohotz was Sony's lame excuse.

Omegasyde5606d ago

@PAL

So Sony just decided on their own merits to waste time and research and remove the other O.S. for the sake of it?

Persistantthug5606d ago

they were afraid it could be used as an exploit to get into the system and potentially cause other issues....like patch coding into the network and causing havoc.

But Geohot wasn't the specific reason. Sony had decided to remove the OTHEROS before Geohot even came into the picture.

Biggest5606d ago

Persistantthug had dirt in his eyes when the OtherOS feature was taken away. There was one and only one outspoken person attempting to hack the PS3 using the OtherOS. I'll give you one guess as to who that one person was. When they removed the OtherOS there were a few more people saying that they would get it back "FOR THE PEOPLE!!!" but nothing came of it until the PS3 repair key was stolen. George was the reason for the initial problem.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5606d ago
beardpapa5606d ago (Edited 5606d ago )

He didn't "re-enable" a feature such as OtherOS, otherwise N4G would've been spammed with articles of Geohotz bringing back OtherOS to PS3. No, he re-enabled a Playstation "feature" back in the PS1 days called "Playing Backups"

Omegasyde5606d ago

The PS1 had a hard drive? I didn't know that!

but back then you have to actually open the system and use a imported MOD chip or a Interplay device and hot swapping a real legit copy with a burned version.

IS this the playstation feature you are talking about? Because his hack doesn't require any opening of the game console or hot swapping games. It fools the system into thinking a .PKG file is a PSN download.

m23455606d ago

deadreckoning: um...no, just no.

Strikepackage Bravo5606d ago

Ofcoarse everyone here on N4G will take Sonys side because most people here are a bunch of mindless cultees. But in reality when you think about it, what Sony did was REALLY F'ed up. Removing features, even from already purchased units, a feature that they bragged about as a selling point.

This is like selling someone a 1080p TV then dropping it to 720p via mandatory firmware update after you get it home and plug it in. Either you take the update or the TV cant receive signals from cable or over the air. How many of you would defend that? I guess if Sony did it most of you would be OK with it, and this is why no one takes Sony fanboys serious as thinking individuals.

Because Sony did the same thing with linux support and you guys defend it and blame the hacker. Say what you will about MS, but they would never do this, they couldn't get away with it.

ForceCSW5606d ago (Edited 5606d ago )

Well actually the firmware update wasn't mandatory. You could keep the option for OtherOS in exchange for PSN access. You couldn't have both, and Sony was fully within their rights when they asked you to choose between the two. If you wanted to keep OtherOS you would be denied access to PSN because you no longer fit the requirements to log onto PSN (you agreed when signing up for PSN to the stipulation that Sony has the right to change the requirements for PSN access at any time). So don't act like OtherOS was forcefully ripped from you, for YOU had to accept the download for the update that would take it away.

PeterGriffinSays5606d ago

You guys are the biggest PS3 fanboys on earth. Yall know you hack EVERYTHING else, but when it comes to PS3 its a problem? And Sony was wrong for taking away Linux and BC, so Geohot makes a point. Bunch of lames yall are. Bunch of LAMES.

King-Leonidas5606d ago

lol what a douche!!! Sony took it away because Froddo hacked it wtf is frodos problem

PS3n3605606d ago

I guess since there are a lot of gun analogies going on i will throw one in too. You can buy certain guns but it is illegal to modify them to make them fully automatic.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 5606d ago
Balt 5606d ago (Edited 5606d ago )

And, like I said all along, George will win -- Sony will lose, as they always do in court.

Bleemcast anyone?
Dualshock anyone?
Optic Disc Drive case anyone?

This will be no different. George has a great case here and and argument of re-enabling features once in the system is a home run for the defense.

Sony will lose and lose big. I just wonder how Sony will like that egg served when it gets tossed all over their face.

GSpartan7775606d ago (Edited 5606d ago )

Sony won't lose much from this other than reputation from the loud minority. George isn't counter-suing and unless the hack impacts hardware and software sales, nothing much will be lost and people will simply forget about this till someone decides to throw this in a flame war.

MUHAHAHAHAAHAHA5606d ago

as much as sony should of won those trials. they should win this one. or else.....

ct035606d ago

or else.... your screen name

joeorc5606d ago

@Balt in order to install other OS...that had to be done through the ?

XMB

your PS3 did not come with Linux preinstalled.

so How did Sony remove Linux off of your PS3?

did you just turn on your PS3 one day and it was gone?

no they asked the Consumer if they wanted to Continue to use the "INSTALL OTHER OS OPTION"

an gave the stipulations on what would happen if you wanted to keep it.

due to security unless you have an updated firmware you would not be able to play some of the new games that required a new firmware.

they did not out right take it off your system. to Top it off NOT ONLY DID THE SLIM NOT COME WITH SUCH A FUNCTION BUT GEOHOTZ and these Hacker's are putting that function back into the XMB and telling everyone how to do it. so if you do that is your warranty still covered?

How about access to PSN?

so if not only you hack your system than try to bypass PSN security that makes it all right then?

So it's not alright to protect the Software os on a machine? that the consumer buy's, how about any software that the consumer Buy's?

You cannot say it protect's this software copy rights but not this software's copy right's?

If this goes The Hackers way this set's back software copy protection Laws..How about every game goes opensource..remember you buy the software right?

you can do anything with that software you want to right?

Omegasyde5606d ago

O I forgot that back then the firmware was optional, thus is you wanted OtherOS just don't update your firmware.

PeterGriffinSays5606d ago

Bullshit @ optional firmwares.

Omega Zues5606d ago

"Imagine taking in your car for an oil change and having the manufacturer remove your car's air conditioner, radio, and half its horsepower because of fears that other hypothetical individuals might abuse their vehicles. It just doesn't make any sense, and it's a slap in the face to the consumers that put their support behind the product." - Yasha Heidari.

Thats their best direction on this case? Did Sony remove your games? Did Sony descrease your PS3 power? If I remember correctly, Sony over the years through updates increased the power. Faster and even gave back more Ram for developers. Removing the OS feature was minor at best. And to bad, this OtherOS has nothing to do with the real reason. The whole thing this is happening is because of...

"release of the PlayStation 3's root key."

And so far, OtherOS has been the last thing thats came out of Geo lips. In fact the first thing he did was laugh at Sony and made "Hello World". Come on Geo, wheres ma OtherOS?

PirateThom5606d ago

Exactly, if he was working to restore OtherOS... where is it?

BrianC62345606d ago

I say hackers should go back to working on PCs. They're dirt cheap and wide open. I see no reason they have to ruin gaming for the rest of us. I hope Sony wins big in this case.

protekjv5606d ago

aren't they the reason sony remove the "OtherOS" feature.

MUHAHAHAHAAHAHA5606d ago

its for security reasons me thinks

ct035606d ago

That's the official explanation anyway. Saving on maintenance and QA costs is certainly part of the reason. But that's okay, the Sony cheerleaders even applaud when they lose a feature.

MUHAHAHAHAAHAHA5606d ago

nope its for security reasons why would they remove it for money. it wont make a difference if they remove it you wont make any more profit u absoluteness niknenpoop

Mustang300C20125606d ago

No

Money is the reason they removed it. Just like they removed the backwards compatibility and USB ports to save money are the reasons they removed it.

BrianC62345606d ago

No, Sony removed the Other OS feature mainly because it made it too easy for hackers to mess with the PS3. If stupid hackers would go away and leave gaming consoles alone we'd all be better off. They're all a bunch of crooks.

PirateThom5606d ago (Edited 5606d ago )

Money had nothing to do with it, OtherOS didn't cost Sony anything.

Before Geohot there was another attempted hack via Linux, Sony released a firmware update that reduced Linux's access to RAM and SPEs further. No one complained, people only complained when Geohot managed to get access to the hypervisor via Linux and they said they were removing it.

ct035606d ago

Sony removed OtherOS *for the good of mankind*
Sony removed backwards compatibility *for the good of mankind*
Sony only does everything *for the good of mankind*

Omega Zues5606d ago

Save money? Previously Sony was losing hundreds on each console made.

Its clear Sony did NOT remove an "Software" to save money.

In fact Sony stated long ago, most profits come from Software sales, Not hardware. Which was also true for Microsoft. So far Nintendo with the Wii was first this gen to release a system that actually made profit off each system sold. It takes years before Sony or Microsoft was able to break even or make profit off Console sales.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5606d ago
rhood0225606d ago

Exactly. Sony removed it in response to what Geo was trying to do--very publicly I might add-- with the system in terms of using the OtherOS open up the system.

They way they are wording it, at least according to this article, is that Sony just arbitrarily decided to remove it.

But claiming that this was a "core feature" of the PS3 is intellectually dishonest on the part of this law group. It was an optional feature, nothing more..

ash_divine5606d ago (Edited 5606d ago )

yep. I've tryed to remind people of this fact. But people have either forgotten or tryed to gloss over this. When was OtherOS removed? About a week or two after Geohot declared that he could hack the PS3 using it. Are these guys seriously going to pretend that Geohot had nothing to do with it. What a bunch of liars. You know who else lies like that? Criminals, just sayin'.

Bottom line is, had Geohot never got involved, we'd still have OtherOS. Jailbreak wouldn't exist (because the removal of OtherOS was supposedly the reason why other hackers got involved. ). And best of all, there'd be no drama, which that we would be focused on GAMES right now if it wasn't for geohot. Which is the reason I dislike him most.

rant over.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5606d ago
Dart895606d ago

Oh boy it's about to get hot in here.

silkrevolver5606d ago

...it’s going to get “Geo hot."

Dart895606d ago

I was gonna post the video but forgot to lol.

Show all comments (117)
60°

Final Fantasy X 25th Anniversary Website Launches With New Nomura Artwork and Merchandise

Square Enix launches Final Fantasy X 25th anniversary site, revealing new Nomura art, books, music releases, and merchandise.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
-Foxtrot23d ago

Look I know VIII has its issues and all that but how on earth can the do big anniversary events with new artwork and merchandise for VII, IX and X yet VIII got sweet f*** all.

They could have given it something during its 25th anniversary yet all it got was a single Happy Anniversary post on their social media.

solideagle23d ago

they should know that we are OG fans of VIII as it sold truckload as well. not as much as VII or X. I personally didn't like IX but X and VI are my personal fav.

Shadow Hearts 2 covenant is another game I love. I hope one day someone can make remake, I would be delighted

Relientk7723d ago

Final Fantasy VIII is great and you are always the first to defend it in the comments

40°

15 Years Ago, Mortal Kombat (2011) Saved Gaming’s Biggest Fighting Franchise

A brutal reset, a smarter story, and a return to what made it great—Mortal Kombat (2011) revived the series.

Read Full Story >>
fortressofsolitude.co.za
italiangamer32d ago

"Gaming’s Biggest Fighting Franchise"

Press X to (seriously) doubt.

DarXyde30d ago

Underrated comment. I used to hate that game so much that any time my siblings asked me to play it, I just picked Hom and shut myself down mid-match.

Soy30d ago

And then MK1 killed it again.

DivineHand12530d ago (Edited 30d ago )

15 years went by so fast. I remember playing through the story mode at launch.

90°

PlayStation legend Shuhei Yoshida says Jim Ryan fired him because he didn't listen to him

Why did Sony push Shuhei Yoshida out of his role leading PlayStation's first-party games? He'd overseen some huge successes. Well, apparently, he didn't listen.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
Relientk7731d ago

Yeah I can see that for sure. Shuhei Yoshida should have been in charge not Jim Ryan.

Cacabunga31d ago

It should be free highway for him now.. but Sony are too stupid to see this, especially that moron Hulst

S2Killinit31d ago (Edited 31d ago )

Wtf why all that anger. PlayStation is dominating on every level. Besides I think there is a little more to hiring a CEO than just who is available. Its not like its a athlete your team wants to buy.

neutralgamer199231d ago

S2Killinit

live service failures, chasing trends, closing studios. yes dominating

Cacabunga30d ago

Sony is Dominating because competition is not existing. Compared to previous gens this is the poorest in terms of software offerings.

Last gen we got Uncharted 4 Lost Legacy and TLOU2 from ND alone.

This is so far a remasters gen, with no competition to lift up the quality

1nsomniac30d ago (Edited 30d ago )

..."PlayStation is dominating on every level"....

...Really???

PlayStation are soon heading into a new generation in the not to distant future. They currently have the worst customer satisfaction they've ever sustained as a company. The company is heading for a huge crash while at the same time they'll need to be planning how they are going to try and win back that favour and the build up to their new releases.

Yes financially they're winning but they're going to have to ride out this complete public corporate disaster. No one has faith in the company or the product anymore. They've damaged their public image so much this generation. Greed can kill anyone.

medman30d ago

Hulst is a disaster......

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 30d ago
blacktiger30d ago

He would've done the same thing and fire Jim Ryan and Shuhei would be the villain. Why?
Because Elite creates the narrative and distraction for gamers, users and citizens.

Outside_ofthe_Box31d ago

More confirmation that Jim Ryan is the culprit for what has happened to Sony. Hulst needs to go too. What sucks is that a lot of the good top heads at Sony are no longer there. I wish that guys that were forced out prematurely by Dumbo Jimbo like Shuhei and Layden came back.

robtion30d ago

Yep. Yoshida was responsible for bringing one of the best games of this generation to playstation (Stellar Blade). He is an actual gamer and is in touch with what gamers want (creative, fun games, not GaaS and agenda pushing). He also seems like a genuinely nice guy if you watch some interviews. Of course they got rid of him.

darthv7231d ago

Makes you wonder if MS even thought about hiring him after Phil and Sarah were leaving. He certainly couldn't make their situation any worse.

Agent7531d ago

Microflop. After Windows XP and Xbox 360, it all went floppy.

S2Killinit31d ago

Floppy 😆
No pun intended

badz14931d ago

Yoshida for President! Jim Ryan was and always be a hack! Sony should get Shu back

Lightning7731d ago

All the gamer/consumer lead heads are gone across PS and Xbox. shuhei gone phil's gone (questionable) but gone. The future of gaming is somewhat uncertain across the board.

Show all comments (30)