All Channels
Popular
180°

LittleBIGPlanet 2 PS3 bundle is officially confirmed

Sony's just confirmed that there will be a LittleBIGPlanet 2 bundle with the PS3 320gb.

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.de
Dylantalon15611d ago

wicked, now hopefully killzone 3 will get bundled with a ps3 also

Krew_925611d ago

It may most likely get bundled with Killzone 3, but it would only be in Europe, which sucks for Americans. Then again we get way more stuff than Europeans so I feel their pain. =(

FrankMcSpank5611d ago (Edited 5611d ago )

Americans should be allowed to have the bundles too, but it sells better overseas. Americans have proven time and again they won't give the PS3 a chance. 10 years of hardcore Sony gaming, and then 14 months of Xbox marketing before the PS3 launch has convinced them to abandon everything that gaming once stood for. And COD was on PS2 first. It's a shame.

RedRedSuitSDF5611d ago

Actually, we have both consoles because we love to game.

Sneak-In5611d ago

The real shame is that these two great consoles can't just coexist and give gamers what they want without starting some fanboy wars.

Playstation-3605611d ago

finally, now that the PS3 is not too expensive, I wish they would make PS3 in different colours according to games outside japan- it would tempt me to buy one to upgrade from my 3 year old fat PS3

Yi-Long5611d ago

... waiting for one to come along with a cool color.

Here in Holland, we only have the black PS3. It sucks.

I was hoping for a cool LBP2 bundle with a nicely colored PS3, but once again Sony doesn't give a shit about giving us europeans any color-options...

MrGoogle5611d ago

I love Sackboy! Perhaps I will change my 120GB-PS3 with this Bundle...

blackburn55611d ago

All Sony has to do is make a $199.99 model with less gigabytes and they will clean up. Make it happen Sony

divideby05611d ago

200 buck PS3 with all the games this year..sony will make it all up on software...

4D5611d ago (Edited 5611d ago )

Sony is struggling to break even with their price points now. Not to mention the costs of giving PSN away for free. They are reduced to bastardizing software sales to try to get people to buy the PS3. Not to mention they are also bundling PS3's with HDTV's.

We won't be seeing a $199.00 price point from Sony any time soon. Even if they did drop the price they won't make up the loss on software sales because people who buy PS3's now are either replacing existing consoles or else they are the late adopting casual crowd.

blumatt5611d ago

I doubt Sony will drop the PS3 to $200 until maybe 2012, but I do see them dropping the price of the lowest PS3 to $250. That would still move quite a few consoles. 250GB PS3 for $250 and 500GB PS3 for $300. Then maybe a 500GB PS3 with Move for $350. A $100 price cut is still a little ways off, but $50 could happen.

5610d ago
Sneak-In5611d ago

@blackburn5:

Agree. It's still too expensive.

Sneak-In5611d ago

Imo it is. I own a PS3 myself but I actually think its too expensive to just buy another (in case it gets an YLOD or something else) after the guarantee ran out.

Show all comments (18)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
26d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted25d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8525d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele25d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla25d ago (Edited 25d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk25d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay24d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 24d ago
Athlon10125d ago (Edited 25d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit24d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg24d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10124d ago (Edited 24d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14925d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
38d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_38d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle38d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit38d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog38d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog38d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad38d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_38d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage38d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda38d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

38d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong64d ago

looks god awful on the base systems