All Channels
Popular
110°

Why Kinect 'Cost to Make' Articles Are Deceiving

VideoGameWriters:
"Whenever a new piece of hardware/accessories comes along from a major company, articles pop up all over the internet about how much the objects cost to make. Most point out to users the huge price discrepancies between the cost to make and the cost to customer, hoping to incite mindless raging trolls or fanboy flaming – all which make them money in hits.

The number that most of these articles are reporting is called the bill-of-materials which is the cost of the parts that make up the Kinect Sensor. This number comes from a 3rd party who takes apart a unit and prices out the components. Yes, it does only cost a meager 56 bucks for parts, but what really needs to be added into the equation to find out what the Kinect costs per unit?

Read Full Story >>
videogamewriters.com
BShea5618d ago

It's absolutely insane! I wish I could see what some of the prototypes looked like and what MS learned from what they succeeded and failed at.

DuneBuggy5618d ago

Ehh..30k wouldnt even cover the bodywork on a concept/prototype car.
Even a subcompact like a Ford Focus would easily cost millions in total development costs.

TheOldOne5618d ago

@ Dunebuggy

and why are you comparing cars to a gaming peripheral?

DuneBuggy5618d ago (Edited 5618d ago )

Just showing that prototypes of just about anything are far more expensive than their future mass produced cousins.
30k for a Kinect Prototype is cheap in the grand scheme of things.

BShea5618d ago

Very interesting article. People like to jump to the same conclusion with games as well. Just because it's printed on a blu-ray or 360 disc that costs a dollar or two to produce doesn't mean thats the only cost incorporated into the actual making of the game.

Nice insight.

Millah5618d ago

This sort of insight should already be common sense. Of course R&D costs companies a ton of money. I shake my head anytime I see a "costs to make" article. Apparently these guys think that products just design and build themselves. More or less its just a reflection of how much ignorance there is in journalism, that an article like this needs to remind people of the obvious.

lastdual5618d ago (Edited 5618d ago )

It's the same with any product. Reasearch & development costs, empoyee wages, marketing expenses...

Making a profit isn't 'evil', it's necessary for businesses to stay alive. And especially when you're talking about a luxury good (yes, it *is* possible to live without video games), harping over profit margins is a little foolish.

Demand dictates the price. If you don't want to pay for it, don't. Protesting with your wallet will make more of a difference than complaining on the internet.

killyourfm5618d ago

Agreed on all counts. What I think *is* evil are sites that ignorantly proclaim something costs $X to make and therefore generate $X profit.

S1nnerman5618d ago

As a comparator, the Gillette Mach3 safety razors were introduced in 1998 after more than $750 million in research and development costs. Seriously, $750 million in R&D alone!! Then marketing. Salaries etc. The blades used by Mach3 only cost a few cents to produce, but can sell for over $2 each. If we only considered the production costs vs sale price, it would be misleading. It's the same in every industry as lastdual says!

killyourfm5618d ago

Holy crap...$750m to develop a razor. Staggering..

S1nnerman5618d ago

I saw it on TV ... utterly amazing. I couldn't believe it lol I was thinking, how hard can it be?!?

DuneBuggy5618d ago

Its funny.I USE a Mach3 razor. Gillette mailed me one around 98'-99' (I didnt request it either). Been loyally buying blades for it ever since.

jacksons985618d ago

Microsoft probably pays less than that per unit since they are buying in the millions and they are made in China.

Show all comments (19)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai30d ago (Edited 30d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio30d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing29d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9230d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit29d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing29d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9229d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay31d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn232d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn231d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown32d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay31d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay31d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac31d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger32d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300032d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde32d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde31d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7533d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_31d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.