All Channels
Popular
150°

DTG: 3 Things Sony Should Do In 2011

The second of three pieces in the 'Should Do In 2011' series for DTG, Brian McCormick puts Sony under the spotlight for some hopeful pleas as to what they should achieve in 2011.

Read Full Story >>
dedicatedtogamers.co.uk
Focker4205625d ago

What a surprise... cross game chat. *rolls eyes*

zeksta5625d ago

I'm not entirely sure why the hell it's the most wanted feature.. You can already chat to your friends on most games that have online capability, what's so special about chatting to a friend on another game?

It defeats the purpose of Teamwork when you have a 1 on 1 Chat with a person who's playing another game.

Arup025625d ago

MOst of the time i play with people i never saw in my life. So if a friend of mine is playing another game, i prefer to chat with him instead of keep hearing some random dude chatting with me.

jwk945625d ago

Its not just to talk to them across another game, its to talk to them in games that don't have the voice functionality, or to talk to them in a private conversation in COD or uncharted or some other online game. I for one would love this feature, well actually, a party system would be more beneficial.

ABizzel15625d ago

I'd rather have a party system then cross game chat, but I think they're right about everything except move.

I'd rather have my exclusives then a move game. 3rd parties are going to take care of Move for Sony by simply porting over the Wii versions of their games to HD for the PS3. Same game recycled for another sell, always makes sense. The problem is it's taking them so long to do it. It should have been done DAY 1.

Bobbykotickrulesz5625d ago

Being in a PRIVATE chat is what I want. Just myself and whoever else I have in my group, party etc etc. I hate listening to people jabber and I hate having them listening to my conversations.

Spitfire_Riggz5625d ago

Its just a better way to communicate with your friends. Unless you prefer using the dualshock to select each letter.. for now a keyboard.

FrankMcSpank5624d ago

The only Sony really needs to do is market the hell out of their stuff in the States. America is so 360 driven from advertisments that they would go to walmart and buy kung fu panda for the 360 thinking that is the only release of the week and skip uncharted or LBP. That's because MS will put out an ad ever commercial break. "Play Black Ops on Xbox 360." Selling multiplat games like they are exclusives. Marketing Marketing Marketing is the key. Sony has the games, they need to open American's eyes to their great line up.

joeorc5624d ago

yes it's only on playstation Home right now, but playstation home has some great indie development games going on well into next year ..I think many are overlooking that very part of How Home is becoming a great platform for Indie developer's and this artical kinda shows that. In my opinion

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5624d ago
Calm Down Sunshine5624d ago

Being able to ask your bff what he's having for tea isn't improving the GAMING experience is it, kidletts?

The lack of cross game chat really isn't something to complain about.

You "chatterers" have a detrimental affect on teamwork.

beavis4play5624d ago

yea, f#ck cross game chat - give me something to plug into my wall that will charge my ps3 controller, so i don't have to leave the system on to do it!

blumatt5624d ago

There's several third party solutions for that, man. Lots of plug-in charger stations.

beavis4play5624d ago (Edited 5624d ago )

thanks, blumatt! i wasn't aware there were any available.

bubbles for you!

blumatt5624d ago

And thanks for the bubble up. The mods took one away awhile back because I put several curse words in one of my comments. lol I learned from that mistake, though. haha

oddexarcadia5625d ago (Edited 5625d ago )

If they want to see a rise in sales of PS+ subscriptions they need to add some solid features. In the current state, gamers are gambling their subscription fees in hopes of getting discounts or games that are appealing to them.

Sony really needs to add some features such as
1. PS2 backward compatibility
2. PS+ exclusive apps such as Last.fm
3. A library of games that PS+ members can choose from to get their discounts.

Overall, PS+ is on the right track. It just needs to move from being a gaming gamble to an gaming investment.

HeavenlySnipes5625d ago

thats an entirely good idea. Then it'll tun into PS+ getting all the useful apps in the future like possible Google Tv etc.. while normal users get jack shit. I think they should just discount more things to add to the ones they have been doing and continue to offer free games.

Along with that the already give away beta access to popular games and occasionally do stuff like what they are currently doing with MAG. Allowing PS+ users to play the full game free with a level cap at level 8 or so.

oddexarcadia5625d ago

Well normal users get "jack shit" as is. I mean, besides the fact that PSN offers free online gaming.
When you get a PS3, you get access to what you paid for. If people are willing to buy into a subscription, they are getting more. It works the same way on the 360. You guy Gold to get more out of your system as an option. So I can't really see why normal users would be getting "jack shit" when they refuse to get PS+. They would be getting what they paid for, same as the PS+ members.

Calm Down Sunshine5624d ago

@oddexarcadia

We (normal users) are still getting firmware updates and new features, but if that proposed idea was to go ahead then I'm worried that it wouldn't be long before parts of, if not eventually all firmware updates will be strictly for PS+ users.

Lazyeye795625d ago

One great feature that PS+ could introduce is much faster download speeds. Everything I download on the Playstation store downloads at around 2 to 3 Mb.

And no its not my internet connection or wireless connection because my laptop gets around 3x that. When downloading updates for MAG (after the PS Store part) speeds jump up to 5Mb or more. So Sony really needs to increase download speeds.

GeneGodHand5625d ago (Edited 5625d ago )

Ps3 owners have it really good. Honestly i just want Versus to come out already.

beavis4play5624d ago

i'd rather see agent next year than VS

blumatt5624d ago

I want Versus to come out already, and stay PS3 exclusive. I don't care if it's ported later, but I want it developed with all the power of the PS3 used. Then, it can be nitpicked and downplayed to work on the 360. I don't care if 360 owners enjoy the game too, but not at the expense of the PS3 version.

theafroman5625d ago

yea i pretty much agree on that but oddly i feel like its not gonna happen.nothing would make me happier if turned out wrong though.

DigitalRaptor5625d ago (Edited 5625d ago )

Advertise their games. I mean really advertise!

Sony has a killer lineup and it's all well and good us guys on the internet knowing about it, but many of these games deserve big sales and recognition amongst the mainstream and unless Sony makes an effort on that front, they might not get their due.

Show all comments (27)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
28d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted28d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8528d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele27d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk27d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay27d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 27d ago
Athlon10128d ago (Edited 28d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit27d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg27d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10127d ago (Edited 27d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14927d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
41d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_41d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle40d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit40d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog41d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog41d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad41d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_41d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage41d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda40d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

41d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong67d ago

looks god awful on the base systems