All Channels
Popular
200°

DTG: Move vs. Kinect: A Year-End Review

DTG have had a fair bit of time with the two most recent entries into the motion control scene on the consoles - Move and Kinect - now. As 2010 draws to a close, DTG adjudicates Move vs. Kinect.

DTG write: "This year, both Microsoft and Sony publicly admitted “you were right, Nintendo!” by releasing their own motion-based peripherals, the Kinect motion camera and the Move motion wand. Both received mixed reviews, and opinions of both have ranged from disappointed to gleeful. Dedicated to Gamers - whilst we've formally expressed our opinions on both already - now take a moment to reflect on both motion controllers now that Move and Kinect have had a fair amount of time on the market. We would like to compare the reliability, longevity, entertainment value, and accuracy of the motion"...[ctd.]

Read Full Story >>
dedicatedtogamers.co.uk
ForzaGT5629d ago

no way the accuracy is a tie, and I have both, move is way more accurate then kinect even too much for some games like table tennis

GWAVE5629d ago

Move has a narrower range in many games. Players need to stay in the camera's "view" in order for that accuracy to matter. The Fight is an example of a game that has great accuracy...as along as you stay in view. On the other hand, Kinect is much MUCH more forgiving of broader motions.

Balt 5629d ago (Edited 5629d ago )

Forgiving? That's an understatement.

http://blog.games.yahoo.com...

Newtype5629d ago

WTF? Why the hell would you move outside of the viewing area of the camera? Do you plan on playing in another room? wtf?

mrv3215629d ago

I'm pretty sure if you move outside of Kinects view you'll have a hard time playing it also.

pinksteak095629d ago

uuuuuhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh don't players have to stay in KINECT'S line of sight also? or does it work while you're in the bathroom dropping brown bombs and it's connected in your living room...amazing

strickers5628d ago

Kinect has a narrower viewing angle than PSEye.Go look at tech spec you dumbass.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5628d ago
sinclaircrown5629d ago

I was skeptical on both. Just got Kinect as an xmas gift.

No its not a tie. Move is more accurate. Honestly though, IMO, the lag on Kinect isn't bad.

So far, from what I've seen, its going to depend on the game. I played Kinect adventures, and one fitness game, forget the name. Some of the games on adventure I noticed a longer lag. Others, especially the fitness one, I really didn't notice any.

I'll reserve my judgement until I see what games come out next year. So far, its just mindless fun. Yes, I have to stand while playing, yes I look like a fool jumping around my living room.

I have no problem looking like a fool as long as I'm having fun though.

Right now, I couldn't play it for very long each time. Looking forward to see what else comes out though.

And I don't care if its an eyetoy ripoff. To me its an improved version of eyetoy. To me, Move is an inproved version of Wii.

I will lose no sleep wondering whose the best between Sony and MS. I'll play the games I enjoy, and I'll have fun.

To the people who actually care which company is best: You need to get out more!

talltony5629d ago

Kinect for dancing games. Move for everything else.

Balt 5629d ago (Edited 5629d ago )

It's almost as if they were adding rounds just so it would end in a tie. I was hoping it'd have went to round 7 -- You know, when they compared which camera had the better looking black casing.

People who can't think for themselves are the ones keeping these sites open.

DMason5629d ago

I have both. Initially, I thought I'd never use any of them after I got them out of the box. At first, I played Kinect more because my girlfriend was into it and it had a bit more in terms of launch titles. She could use it to workout, etc.

But as of now, I find myself using the Move more, but only with one game. Sports Champions. The Table Tennis in that game is wildly addicting and surprisingly accurate. I also just picked up Echochrome 2 and while I dont think it showcases the Move's ability in the slightest, it's still a nice twist on the puzzle genre.

Dylantalon15629d ago (Edited 5629d ago )

this is the lunacy that gets regurgitated in the media on a daily basis but people would rather hate on HHG instead of insanity such as this article. anyone who has played kinect and move extensively and thinks the accuracy is a tie is an imbecile. kinect has a lot of control latency where itll be idiotic to impliment it has a control scheme in any game that requires fast movements and accurate movements. kinet is a nice piece of hardware but it has a lot of issues and thats why you dont see it being used in any of the xboxes hardcore games or core games that requires precise movements on the fly and to negate that fact if youve played it means youre likely an idiot or fanboy.

majority of the gaming community or the ones that would believe kinect is revolutionary are whats wrong these days. these people dont see they are hurting or stalling progression because of their stupidity. i dont care for whoever is a fan of which ever console, but just stop with the insane allegiance of a console company. just admit the truth because if you support sh.., youll continually get sh..look at the xbox 360 lineup of games for next year. the microsoft execs have seen that kinect is doing well and the majority of the user feedback has been positive because fanboys are idiots so the message these execs have is that kinect is revolutionary and is amazing so they are putting most resources on making kinect games.fanboys, youve dug your own grave, now eat worms

jarrod19815629d ago

didnt bother to read all that novel you just wrote but why so defensive? there will be plenty of great games to play on 360 next year and kinect is fine. its a lot of fun playing with my family and that is what its for. even if they made hardcore games for it i would still use the controller. no need to call anyone idiots.

Bigpappy5629d ago

May be he can explain why 360 is selling about a mil a week this month. Do you believe its COD? That game is on PS3 and the wii. To deny that Kinect is a system seller for M$ is just plain denial. He must be speaking from a pure hardcore perspective.

pinksteak095629d ago

pffffft here we go with the SALES rant, honesty bigpappy, how much of a profit revenue ARE YOU seeing from microsofts SALES? atleast earn a penny before speaking on behalf of a company you're not employed by

btk5629d ago

Compare Table Tennis on both. Kinect Table Tennis is like the PS2 EyeToy handball table tennis. The Move Table Tennis is like real Table Tennis.

Compare Golf on both. Move has 2 Golfing games that feel like real golf. Both multiplatform. Neither support Kinect. Go figure.

There is not much to compare between Move and Kinect. Move works properly for games that require precise and quick motion control. Kinect works for ripped of copies of EyeToy games.

For the Kinect army out there -
1) Show me a Kinect golfing game that works as well as John Daly's ProShot Golf.
2) Show me the game on Kinect that cannot be done with PS Eye / Move. And please - no waffling about the potential and future 4-times-more-accurate-just-wai t-and-see nonsense.

Yes Kinect is a system seller as we expected after the massive marketing campaign. Reality will set in. Just how many dancing games do you want to play in the end?

testerg355629d ago

Well in Kinect volleyball you actually have to jump. What do you do on the Move? You raise both Move controllers. In Kinect soccer you actually have to kick.. in Move you???

pinksteak095629d ago

MOVE soccer...wow...WHERE?

strickers5628d ago

A soccer game based on netball?Wow,how accurate?You can't move.Ha,ha,ha.

baodeus5629d ago

i guess game like dance central can probably be done on pseye with moves attach to your arms, your back, legs, hips, thigh, man, that is gonna be a lot of move required just for one game.

Show all comments (36)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio27d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing27d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9227d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit27d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing27d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9227d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
30d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted29d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8529d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele29d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk28d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay28d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 28d ago
Athlon10129d ago (Edited 29d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit28d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg28d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10128d ago (Edited 28d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14929d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay28d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn229d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn228d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown29d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay28d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay28d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac28d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger29d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300029d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde29d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde28d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)