All Channels
Popular
200°

Why Activision Blizzard needs another franchise?

Activision Blizzard is losing ground as we know it. Why? Two of their biggest franchises have finally kicked the bucket in sales. This is in part due to the fact of what I call “franchise fatigue” where publishers push to many games of the same franchise.

Read Full Story >>
justpushstart.com
jbl3165628d ago (Edited 5628d ago )

Yeah totally agree about Tony Hawk franchise. The last few games have failed to capture the magic of earlier titles. I'm now totally converted to being a Skate 3 nut lol

Xusuyzus5627d ago (Edited 5627d ago )

true,.. but skate is getting to much into sim,.. not gamy enough,.. actually in Skate I think sometimes I would need a fighting-game stick instead of controller,..they are getting a bit off,..

they are getting to be GT5,..and that is cool,.. but I doubt there are so much people into real skating, than there are people into driving and cars,.. lol

Does anyone remember the times,..when we were collecting S.K.A.T.E,.. when in Tony Hawk 2 you jumped over a bumb,.. and it was like a trick,..(not that that is morally good,.. but it was a fun game

They should go back to the roots and make game fun,..

bdw fuck activision,..

Perjoss5627d ago

I think the tony hawk division was caught snoozing. I guess they adopted that 'people are going to buy it anyway' attitude and didn't see the skate IP coming.

I never really skated for real, but tony hawks 1 has many fond memories for me, it really was a brilliant game, so much fun.

morganfell5627d ago

They likely have a split franchise under development internally - Starcraft Ghost. They confirmed it was never canceled from last gen and even bought the studio that took the development over from Nihilistic which had been contracted out. The game was to be a TPS title. They had stated as soon as Starcraft II shipped they would revisit the IP for development.

MightyMark4275628d ago

I think Call of Duty gives Activision a lot of money. Without the franchise, i don't know if there will still be Activision.

trevonn955627d ago

seriously? WORLD OF WARCRAFT SAYS HI

cereal_killa5627d ago

True but that's PC only they cant rely on WOW keeping there console devision alive if COD dies just like the Guitar Hero and Tony Hawk franchises

SnakeMustDie5627d ago (Edited 5627d ago )

As long as there is WoW(CoD will die sooner or later), ActiBlizz won't need another franchise. Sad but true, they can just milk WoW, CoD and GH for all its worth.

r1sh125627d ago

yep totally agree.
I feel like Call of Duty has lost it completely.
Not to say Im suddenly gonna start playing Bad company or anything but call of duty has gotten really boring. ITs the same thing over and over, with the pretty terrible support IW gave us during MW2 should result in a mass sacking. Treyarch have really been supporting their game but its very flawed on both consoles.
Blizzard have tried other franchises - Blur and that recent James bond game. Both were the worst games I played in each genre, I mean the Blur Beta was better than the finished product. I used to check the blur forums to find fixes, when they released the game they knew about this massive Lag and announced it in the forums, its a working fix.
After about 2 months I never saw an update to fix it.
WTF, Blizzard can only make MMO's, and Activision only have 2 franchises to make money from.
COD and WoW, 1 is set to die soon.

DiabeticJedi5627d ago

I think your getting confused... Blizzard didn't make Blur, that was made by Bizarre Creations. They also made that James Bond Game too. It was published by Blizzard/Activision though so I can see how it could be easy to mix up.

Sitris5627d ago

Blizzard can only make MMOs

HAHAHAHA very funny I totally forgot about starcraft 2 and diablo 3 only the biggest games in there respective genres. Don't talk about what you don't know.

r1sh125627d ago

@sitris...
Forgot about starcraft 2...

@diabeticJedi.. Bizzare had many blizzard devs in the helm. Now Bizzarre are going to be split up..
From what I read about a few months ago.

STONEY45627d ago (Edited 5627d ago )

"Blizzard have tried other franchises - Blur and that recent James bond game. Both were the worst games I played in each genre, I mean the Blur Beta was better than the finished product. I used to check the blur forums to find fixes, when they released the game they knew about this massive Lag and announced it in the forums, its a working fix."

Huh? Blizzard didn't make those, or have ANY involvement. Blizzard doesn't make console games.

"WTF, Blizzard can only make MMO's, and Activision only have 2 franchises to make money from"

You know that before the they made WoW, they had Warcraft 3, Starcraft, and Diablo 2? All non-MMO games. All extremely successful franchises which they are still continuing today. They were even working on an FPS once.

r1sh125627d ago

@stoney4..
I got mixed up with bizzarre n blizzard..
But what I meant to say was, Activision have tried other franchises but they have not worked.

Since the release of blur, bizzarre employees have been moved to blizzard and other activision game devs

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5627d ago
Xusuyzus5627d ago

yes,.. WOW makes them billions,.. and the funny think is,.. that Blizzard cannot really make a bad game,..

but since they are under Activision,.. they could be pressured to release shit sooner and stuff,.. which kind of scares me a bit,..

gypsygib5627d ago

If they only have WoW, Blizzard would never have needed Activision.

toaster5627d ago

Why is there a question mark at the end of the title? I see journalists haven't even passed basic 5th grade English.

turok5627d ago

bobby kotick has gotten most of these losers of n4g by the balls with CoD as it is and goes beyond this website. considering how it went to sell something of 8 million on its first month... thats a heck of alot of fools giving patronage to activision. with the amount of money they are recieving from CoD:BO, they really can just do nothing for the rest of this gen. no need for new ips they already have it made.

and if anyone asks my last game with CoD is MW and when i say MW i mean MW:RE which was on the wii so screw u too.

gypsygib5627d ago

I'd hate COD if I had it on Wii too.

Show all comments (28)
50°

Activision Blizzard’s Platform and Technology Workers Form Union with CWA

Today, nearly 400 video game workers within Blizzard’s Platform & Technology department have voted strongly in favor of union representation with the Communications Workers of America (CWA), either by signing a union authorization card or indicating that they wanted union representation via an online portal.

Read Full Story >>
cwa-union.org
crazyCoconuts217d ago

Just in time before the COD release. This should be interesting.

MrDead217d ago

When you're owned by the biggest corporate c**t to have ever existed then you better be in a union.

270°

Microsoft wins FTC appeal challenging $69 billion Activision Blizzard deal

May 7 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Wednesday rejected a legal challenge by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission to Microsoft's (MSFT.O), opens new tab $69 billion purchase of “Call of Duty” maker Activision Blizzard.
The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower judge's order that said the FTC was not entitled to a preliminary injunction blocking the deal, which closed in 2023.

Obscure_Observer382d ago

Final nail in FTC´s coffin!

It was a lost cause from the start and a waste of taxpayers money!

Reaper22_382d ago

Indeed. When sony got exposed with some of their deals it was pretty much game over.

Christopher382d ago

That's not at all how this works. Sony made deals Microsoft, the trillion dollar company couldn't? You think that's what won them this case?

This wasn't seen as a act of attempting to monopolize the industry. Plain and simple.

Obscure_Observer382d ago

"Indeed. When sony got exposed with some of their deals it was pretty much game over."

And now that MS is releasing all of its Xbox games for all platforms, Phil is free to buy whatever studio or publisher he wants and FTC won´t have a case to say sh!t.

Like I said; It´s final nail in their coffin!

-Foxtrot382d ago

"exposed with some of their deals"

Says the company who said their plan was to "spend Sony out of business", you know a year before they bought Zenimax.

InUrFoxHole381d ago

@Fox
Both sony and ms are dead wrong my guy

TheCaptainKuchiki381d ago

What deals and what "exposed"? Sony did nothing that Microsoft didn't already do during the 360 era. You seem to have a selective memory.

S2Killinit381d ago

@Reaper22
What? Exposed? Deals? Stop talking gibberish.

On topic:
Hope MS’s xbox continues to go down the drain for this. I love how this deal was the nail in xbox’s coffin when some of the corporation worshippers here were hoping MS would deprive others from games that otherwise everyone would be able to play. Instead, MS was forced to put its own games on other platforms to pay for the billions they spent on this mergers/acquisitions. Hope they choke on it.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 381d ago
IRetrouk382d ago

It was a lost cause once ms went multiplat, they cant be anti competitive if they release on everything......

DodoDojo382d ago

No bud this is an appeal, they already failed the first go and the FTC seeked to block the deal way before MS showed any signs of making their games multiplatform. Like most of the courts rulings, it just wasn't seen as the monopoly.

Reaper22_381d ago

Right. And they stated from the beginning that their intent was not to keep games off of plastation. Microsoft served subpoenas on Sony to produce documents and testimony related to the lawsuit, and the FTC ordered Sony to disclose information about its third-party exclusivity deals. And it exposed their dealings with other publishers to keep games off xbox and Gamepass. That is what helped them most in securing the deal.

PhillyDonJawn381d ago

Right, however 10 years from now (gen after next) ms could very well reverse that and get away with it. They'd already have made their money back from the purchase, any contract deal they signed would've be honored and finally expired

__y2jb381d ago

Let’s not rewrite history though. They only went multi platform because they were forced to. They failed to compete so badly it was that or close Xbox completely.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 381d ago
1Victor382d ago

@obscured: “ Final nail in FTC´s coffin!”
Supreme Court here we gooooo 🎼 🎼 🎼🎹 🤣

UltimateOwnage382d ago

lol, celebrating consolidation. Good thing this is the deal that broke Microsoft’s back and made them go the 3rd party route on every platform.

Rockstar381d ago

Obscure will always cheer Microsoft. It doesn't matter the subject matter.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 381d ago
darthv72382d ago

Wait... they were still not done with this deal?

Christopher382d ago

No. FTC has multiple appeals since then. It was very unlikely they would win any, but they still had them. People claiming it was over with the first judge ruling don't understand how the law works and what avenues the FTC had available to them even though appeals are quite normal.

1Victor381d ago (Edited 381d ago )

It goes like this in the USA first trial the court of appeals it can be a partial court of judges if so after you got another appeal to the full court then after goes the supreme with a non full court after it’s another appeal to the full court when the full court decide on it then it’s over till then anything can happen.
Edit I forgot to say that this is a simplified version of things it can take multiple years to get through all the appeals on both sides

JEECE382d ago

This FTC case provided fascinating insight into gamers' views on economics/politics. It's very common for gamers to blame capitalism for many of the negative trends in the industry, but as soon as the U.S. government started exercising one of the most recognized limitations on capitalism (monopoly regulation), most gamers turned into libertarians and starting spouting Republican talking points (or at least pre-Trump era Republican talking points, lol) on "government staying out of the way of private businesses."

red2tango381d ago

They weren't told how to think on this topic so it let them use their brains without being told what to think about a topic. They ended up being reasonable and rational.

Traecy381d ago

I remember when certain people here were saying they weren't going third party, guessing to recoup that 69 billion they are doing just that.

Reaper22_381d ago

They said the same about sony. Now you can play Playstation games on PC/ xbox.

TriniOutsider381d ago

What PlayStation is game is Xbox?

JEECE381d ago

@TriniOutsider

MLB The Show. But arguably that is a special case. The seemingly accepted story behind that is that MLB told Sony they had to start making the game multiplatform to keep the MLB license. I haven't ever read definitive proof that happened, but assuming that (or something like it) is true, that isn't really indicative of a multiplatform trend in the same way that MS's recent launches on PS5 are.

Traecy381d ago

The only PlayStation owned games on XB is Destiny 2 which was already multiplatform & MLB The Show & that's because it's licensed by the MLB & wanted the game multiplatform. XB first party legendary exclusives are going multiplatform as well as the new games that were supposed to be exclusive to the XB gaming console. It looks though the XB gaming console will have minimal timed exclusives to no exclusives at all.

InUrFoxHole381d ago

@TriniOutsider
Get those gloves ready my boy. Gonna need em to move those goal posts. Think with your brain not your gamer heart. You think sony sees ms making all this money and says.. ok get that without us. Help me out here my guy! Sony charged you for psn, then they put their games on pc. What do you think is going to happen next?

PanicMechanic381d ago (Edited 381d ago )

Well said, hahahaha that’s so smart and intelligent and not gaslighty my man. you can now definitely play a lot of Ps games on Xbox. That’s the argument. That’s the point. Well done. PS is going third party. Wow, congratulations, no one realised it. Emphasis again on: it’s PlayStation making the moves to put games on Xbox AND PC. I can’t think of another publisher that’s actually doing that…. Mmmmmmm…. Anyway. Only Sony is doing that and not anyone else, not at all.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 381d ago
381d ago
darthv72381d ago

MS already recouped that $$... the first year.

IRetrouk381d ago

They also lost money on activision in the last few quarters too dont forget, ms make money hand over fist, that's not new, but I highly doubt the investment has paid off yet.

Kekewei381d ago (Edited 381d ago )

To be honest as a long time ps gamer, this deal initially made me panic.

but if I had known that it make MS u-turn on exclusive strategy, I would have happily joined xbox fans supporting the acquisition.

Reaper22_381d ago

They never made a u-turn. Initially Microsoft offered sony a 10 year deal but they turned it down but eventually they agreed. They've always said they wouldn't keep games away from playstation. But that is something Sony was doing to them.

sinspirit381d ago

That's the thing. They said they did not aim to take games away from the competition with the acquisitions and that they weren't taking games away from PlayStation. But then they try to get Sony to sign a 10 year deal just to show to a court that they aren't keeping games away. Sony saw this as a tactic to make their acquisitions look like good faith but in reality they don't need to sign that 10 year contract. They just gotta keep developing games for the console. Then they still excluded games from Sony anyways which is what they wanted while saying they didn't. They are only now going third party because they couldn't monopolize the hardware side of things and they ruined their software sales by trying to make everything a service and now we see them continuously bumping the price and changing policies to stop losing money.

Kekewei381d ago

Yes they did. I mean I was worried about Elder Scrolls series leaving playstation those days, but now I can play Forza horizon and Gears of War on ps5… this is a crazy turn of events

InUrFoxHole381d ago

@Reaper22
You are 💯 correct however we also have to consider these companies lie all the time. Or make plans and change them

IRetrouk381d ago

They certainly did make a u turn, how you can claim otherwise is beyond me.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 381d ago
Show all comments (41)
190°

10 Classic Games That Are Desperate for Remasters

Licensing issues often leave many games forgotten. But all that aside, here are 10 classic games desperate for remasters.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
Iceball2000467d ago

The getaway
Smugglers run
Dead to rights
Worlds scariest police chases
Sure I’m missing a few.

FPS_D3TH467d ago

Mannn… worlds scaries police chases… that took me back lol

Knushwood Butt467d ago

Ape Escape.
Fun game but, wow, you need a college degree to understand the controls.
A remaster would also save you from having to constantly fight the camera.
Keep the music though. Those drum and bass tracks fit really well and haven't aged. Made me think that more games could work well with drum and bass tracks, but unfortunately it's a somewhat niche genre now.

Abear21467d ago

Max Payne Series
Infamous 1 & 2
NBA Street Vol 2
SSX
Skate

M_Prime467d ago

i could have sworn i read somewhere that Remedy is remaking May Payne 1 but things have been quiet lately

YourMommySpoils466d ago

They are making the first one, as we speak.

jznrpg467d ago (Edited 467d ago )

One of the few Xbox games I own. I have 3 copies of it because of the many discs it has, for just in case reasons

jznrpg467d ago (Edited 467d ago )

Xenogears, Xenosaga trilogy, Vagrant Story, Drakengards, Parasite Eve and many more but I’ll start with those

Show all comments (19)