The Kinect glasses had better come with a strap, or else they'll be falling off my face every 5 seconds. I hope they can get the pattern-recognition software working well instead.

you don't need glasses for Kinect. They would be for 3DTVs that don't support autostereoscopy.

But as this is important for many games (racing FPS and flight sims) to see around some object in the middle distance without moving your car, player or plane. We can expect more devs to chirp about the device not being useful for their projects.

The story so far (which hasn't changed since Kinect specs were leaked), is that without USB3.0 and a dedicated processor the device is underpowered. Perhaps Kinect 2 once the dust settles and the device has proven itself even in this 1.0 version with limited features. Meaning as usual if you're an early adopter and expected AAA game support with the 1.0 version of Kinect, you'll get shafted because they already have a second more powerful version on the way.

I think this would be pretty awesome and it would be cheap, wonder why Sony/Microsoft hasn't gone into this? You are still wearing glasses but without the strain of current 3D displays, After about 20min at best buy my eyes hurt.

I could not imagine playing as long as I do with 3D, it's enough strain as it 3D would at least double the strain on my eyes.

I was excited about 3D till I visited my local Best Buy and checked it out, and I think I will pass on this current gen for 3D.

Kinect/pseye don't need glass for this effect! Both can do this kind of headtracking.

fail, move already has augmented reality in start the part and head tracking in gt5 and in the fight and they needed a camera facepalm!!
the only thing is its not in 3d like he showed, it wont take sony long to make a better version

There is at least a few good jokes that could come from that title

That's really cool. It's crazy something like that is possible with gaming controllers 1000's of miles away.

Cool stuff

PlayStation is saving lives and releasing the best games.