Badass Panda: We compare the similarities and differences between 2 of this generation’s most iconic WRPGs.
Ever since playing Elder Scrolls non-stop years ago, i have loved Bethesda-tagged RPGs. Foolishly, i didn’t jump into Fallout 3 straight away in 2008, but when i did i found out that it was a great game full of things to do, and so i was excited about Fallout: New Vegas.
New Vegas is, perhaps controversially, very similar to Fallout 3. As we pointed out in our review, there are enough new features to keep it fresh, and Obsidian have done a great job to keep Bethesda’s standard. But exactly what they did can sometimes be missed, and so it’s time for a Head2Head comparison!
Roll the music!
…We don’t have any music?
"It was so offensive to me"
A remaster of Bethesda Game Studios' 2008 action role-playing game, Fallout 3, is planned for release at some point in the future.
Would be nice if they had New Vegas ready as well, especially because of the show.
Hopefully this doesn't have the same performance issues as Oblivion Remastered.
Throw in all the DLC as well, like Oblivion and I'll definitely bite. I recall having one trophy left to unlock on the PS3 version with 100+ hours in my save. When my save file got corrupted, lol. Very sad day.
To be fair though, Bethesda was trash at Playstation ports anyway.
all devs sucked at porting to ps3 for the first like 3 years because no one had experience with the cell architecture. Even 1st party took a long while to get proficient with it, the difference between uncharted 1 and 3 is massive for example.
Oh oh oh I can do this too. GTA 7 will be made at some point in the future. Fallout 5 will enter development in the future too
Everyone there should know most gamers want New Vegas and Morrowind more than anything.
Which is why we won't get them. Gotta keep floating "support this one and it might happen".
Fallout Day's disappointing news that Fallout 4 is coming to Switch 2 is a shame, as this 17-year-old entry is more deserving of a new port.
Fallout 4 isn't the worst game in the franchise. It's either Fallout 76 or Fallout BOS that's the worst.
PC and all other modern consoles never got a remaster of 3, but obviously the switch 2 was the tipping point to make it a reality... ahuh
Meh, I thought 3 was garbage. I'm not a great fan of the franchise to be fair. They're like B-Movie films, really shallow and janky. 4 was definitely one of the better ones though.
So the article makes a snippy entitled statement and acts like that is going to encourage a publisher to give them what they want. Okay.
This is a silly comparison because Fallout 3 can not take the same route that Vegas did with it's factions and fan service. Fallout 3 is actually a reboot and primer for the console players to step into the Fallout universe. So factions like the NCR and various events discussed in Vegas would too much of a burden for them.
Comparison lacks a really relevant category: Technical issues.
Fallout New vegas is really poor compared to Fallout3 in this category, Where Fallout3 (VANILLA NO DLC) is probably the most polished product made by Bethesda up to date. Fallout Vegas in the other hand is a real disappointment in this category. Constant freezing, bugs which some of are really bad do some serious damage to the games fun factor.
This is a shame as Vegas (imo) is better in pretty much everything else.
Head2Head? Seems like every website out there is trying to rip off someones else's idea. At least attempt to come up with an original comparison name for your stuff. Pathetic!