All Channels
Popular
140°

Microsoft favorite to buy Rock Band developer Harmonix?

Max Console: "MSNBC has been discussing possible purchasers. One of their 'favorites' appears to be MS, who they have the following to say about a potential deal - "exclusivity is big among all three of the console makers, making Harmonix a tempting acquisition if it could design music games specifically for its parent console."

Read Full Story >>
maxconsole.net
golsilva5683d ago

im still thinking ea or activision will be first to buy harmonix but yea in terms of money, ms would be able to offer the most if they really wanted it. but considering that ms hasnt bought many studios this gen or any, this is probably not part of their current strategy.

Dragun6195682d ago

Yeah, I think Harmonix might go to EA or Konami hopefully not Activision. I don't think MS will buy them though, cause Dance Central is right now, only possible on Kinect so MS doesn't have to worry about exclusivity.

muzzy5681d ago

It's really funny how virtually everybody ignores Singstar Dance. If something isn't thrown in your face with $500m advertising it doesn't exist for you?

user8586215681d ago

singstar dance whats that? sing with a microphone in 1 hand n waving a wand in another :S

KotC5681d ago

What is Singstar Dance?

mcstorm5681d ago

Have you seen Singstar Dance it looks the worst dance game ever. And the Advert the have on the TV for it at the moment dose not give it any justice it just makes it look worse.

I hope MS do buy then it would make scene as the RockBand games have always done better on the 360 than the other consoles since the start and they were the ones who backed the game when it was first released and now Dance Central. MS need a company like to to make something there own like sony have done over the years.

zag5681d ago

I surely hope not.

If MS bought them they'll have them shut down and non existing after 3 months.

muzzy5681d ago

@mcstorm: I've seen youtube videos of gameplay. It's a dance game, you move your body to the music. The only difference when it comes down to gameplay is you hold a controller in your hand. I'm not speculating if it's better or worse than Dance Central, just saying it does exist and saying "Dance Central is possible only with Kinect" is being brainwashed by MS advertising and ignoring reality.

Lightsaber5681d ago

WTF does singstar have to do with Harmonix ?

To be honest i dont think it matters who buys them. They dont make anything that be a system seller. Band games have been beaten to death. Not only has has that horse been beaten to death it be beaten into a fine glue.

Dance central can only be done on kinects. plus I dont think that they can make more then 2 or 3 for them till that horse is dead too.

AAACE55681d ago

The only problem is Harmonix only makes music games! Ideally, it would make sense for MS to buy them, but all of the people who like Harmonix games would have to buy a 360 or settle for Guitar Hero. Most would probably just go with GH.

Music games are popular and having Harmonix on MS' team could do well because they can come up with many different games. But at the same time, you don't want to buy a company who is a 1 trick pony. MS did it with their past developers and ended up letting them go because they didn't believe in those studios being able to create another good franchise.

When MS bought Rare, they believed they were getting a great team who would be responsible for the future flagship titles for the Xbox brand! Rare has proven to be a team of over 200 people who can't get it together.

To me, 200 people means you have the teams split in 3 parts. 1 makes games for 360, another makes Kinect games and the other deals with XBL. They haven't come out with a worthwhile title in years!

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5681d ago
RememberThe3575681d ago

I would assume EA, but I'm not sure if the Music game genre is growing or shrinking. They seem to be a solid team though and having them in your corner would not be a bad situation.

Silver3605681d ago

The company is valued based on sales on all three platforms. Being exclusively for the Xbox cuts those sales down to a third. MS would be buying a company at a 300% mark up in the value it is to them. It is better they stay third party.

Rainstorm815682d ago

That would be a fairly big aquisition for MS....Although i dont think it would happen, As MS can get exclusive games from them now.

The only downside is Harmonix only makes music based games, but 360 would have the best availible if the picked them up.

stardusk5681d ago (Edited 5681d ago )

This wouldn't be fair to the ps3 and wii owners. Why would Viacom do that? (sell to Microsoft)

OneSneakyMofo5681d ago

@Close_Second

They make more money making multiplatform games.

Close_Second5681d ago

...the studio making money its about those who own the studio making money and moving on.

Mc Fadge5681d ago

Lipstick on a pig? I mean, the franchise really isn't selling that well after 10,000 editions

yeracnivek715681d ago

...you're confusing Rockband with Guitar Hero, hun. :o

Calm Down Sunshine5681d ago

And then Apple swoop in and snatch the deal, and Harmonix end up working in Apple owned sweatshops crafting titles like "iSing" and "iSing 2" and "iSing 3" for the new Apple "iMic" a microphone with built in speakers and auto-tune, so you can sing your favourite Take That songs wherever you are, for only £375.

Show all comments (37)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio38d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing38d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9238d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit38d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing38d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9238d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay40d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn241d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn240d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown40d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay40d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay40d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac40d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger40d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300040d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde40d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde40d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7542d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_39d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.