I've heard people complain about developers not putting enough time and money into making ps3 versions of games to get them to 1st party standards. Ok, but are you willing to wait? Will you be ok with a game releasing 6-12 months later just so that they can get the ps3 version up to snuf? Will you be happy playing the game a year later than the other platforms every single time? And what about the extra cost, would you mind footing the bill for that too?
For dual console owners such as myself, I'd rather buy the version that is out rather than wait until it is available at a later stage.

That is just awesome.

Both versions are shit

developers needs to put that extra 10 percent on development on ps3 but its worth it i say.

Fans: boycott them if they don't.

Bullshit I thought trey was gonna do a better job but noooo they didn't why because of the god Damn greedy activison sucking Microsoft Dick for more dollars and if it wasn't for the deal they have together trey would've done a better job but this is America people money buy everything

I have the ps3 version and I don't see any of the problems people are talking about. However my friends for some off reason where complaining about how hard it is to kill online on the 360 version. I guess they love mw2 bs.

This is why I own and play both consoles on a daily basis ! I do my research before I pick a multiplatform version of a game regardless of console brand its on ! Metal of Honor lead on PS3 so that's what version I bought , Black Ops lead on 360 so I bought that version !
Next week both ACBH and Hot Pursiut are leadplatform on PS3 ! so I'll get them on PS3 . I don't do Ports .

Activision just makes shitty games. That's really all there is to it.

This article is awesome.

Call of Duty 3 = 1088x624 (2xAA)
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare = 1024x600 (2xAA)
Call of Duty: World at War = 1024x600 (2x AA)
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 = 1024x600 (2xAA)
Call of Duty: Black Ops = 960x544 (2xAA)

Thanks Activision!

Great post :D

this article should be posted on every major gaming site, roflmfao.

Thats why i have play the 360 more than my ps3 this gen.......better not exclusive games so all multiplataform games i buy it for 360.

TreyArch failed. Again. They sure aint no IW. Never will be.

i can say they don't give a SHIT about the PS3.

i respect the NDA's i've signed, so i won't go into a LOT of detail, but while me and the team were doing memory tests on a particular multi-platform project for Activision, i noted that the 360 version was using all 512MB of the console's memory. the PS3 version of that same game was only using 256MB, and, understandably, it was running like shit. but the developer's had the audacity to bitch and complain about the performance of the PS3 version, when they weren't even USING the tools/specs available to them in the PS3 SDKs! this was last year, so it's not like the PS3 was new and the SDKs were super old.

by that point, many a game had been released on the PS3, from Activision no less, but they bitch and moan every single TIME they have to produce a PS3 title. and because they can't just copy paste code from the PC/360 to the PS3, and actually have to, GASP! CODE for the PS3 architecture.

in either case, Activision is a shit company that makes a lot of money for producing mediocre garbage. there was a time when they actually DID have some good games, but then they ran them into the ground. example: Guitar Hero 6, in relation to Rock Band 3. key words being 6 (SIX), and 3(THREE).

Guitar Hero came out in 2005. Rock Band came out in 2007. at the LEAST, the franchises should be a game apart. not 3 and a shit ton of spin offs i didn't bother to list.

i refuse to support Activision products, and i'm a much happier gamer because of it. number of Activision games i've purchased in the past 2 years: 0.

number of games i've purchases from developers that make QUALITY GAMES: too many to count, actually.

i may be one of the few, but i choose to speak with my wallet, and not support shit products from shit publishers. which is a shame, because Activision has a few developers that show genuine promise, but they are hindered by Bobby Kotick and Co.'s greed.

You have to remember this is Treyarch when have they ever made a good COD game?

Look at your comment.
Back to mine. Back to yours
NOW BACK TO MINE.
Sadly, it isn't mine.
But if you stopped trolling and started posting legitimate crap it could LOOK like mine.
Look down, back up, where are you?
You're scrolling through comments, finding the ones that your comment could look like. Back at mine, what is it?
It's a highly effective counter-troll. Look again,
MY COMMENT IS NOW DIAMONDS

Anything is possible when you think before you comment or post.

I'm on a computer

Bobby is a racist and an anti-dentite too.

But nobody ever mentions that because Bobby has Fox News and Murdoch in his pocket.

Everyone one calls for a boycott of Activision, but the thing is most of the gamers buying it are unaware of how they're getting gypped. They just know they're friends are getting it and see the ads. Thus, they buy the game as well. If someone were to put together a class action lawsuit against activision for charging owners of the gimped PS3 version the same amount as the 360 version, they would have a case, considering how popular this game is in the media. Lawyers would definitely want to cash in. Heck, it would force Activison to change its ways since all their previous crappy efforts would be put in the limelight and they would see themselves losing money in the future.

They prioritise the work they put into each version and the 360 usually wins because of the fans they have backing it... Perfect examples are, Uncharted 2, MGS4, KILLZONE 2/3.... I mean honestly... the ps3 is definitely capable... the developers are just not willing...

Fuck the PS3 version, you seen the PC version? Its completely unplayable and not superior at all, whats the point then?

*Sigh*

I laughed! Great writing. Mad Props! :)

What do you expect they only had one year to make this.

to be fair the game plays shitty on the 360 too lol. i miss games like call of duty 4. i dont get companies logic sometimes. make a great game like that then flush it down the toilet with games like black ops. glad i didnt buy this pos!

I bought it on PS3 and have yet to see a 360 version running, but I don't doubt there's a difference and problem. What's so funny is how the game was being marketed by Microsoft as the best on 360 before it even released. I'm not going to come out and say Microsoft obviously had some dirty deal lined up to sabotage the PS3 version, and use that as a marketing tool, but if it was it worked whatever they did. Almost gives me flashbacks to Madden that one year when Microsoft brought Reggie Bush on stage at E3 to hype their version of the game while bashing Sony's version for being inferior. How convienent even though NHL released identical less than 20 days later like EA figured out the PS3 immediately after the show. And I wonder how Microsoft knew for the first year ever in Treyarch's Call of Duty history on PS3 that this would be the year they have trouble.

I have both copies PS3 and 360, and they look the same and play the same, a few minor things here and there are different, but this is being blown out of the water.

Well done.

I knew this would happen when you never seen a PS3 add anywhere , I mean little stuff here and there but nothing like the XB commercials on TV ! and it's funny on how you never seen the PS3 version till after the launch MS PAY Check must of been HUGE to keep it hidden ! But as usual Sony doesn't care cause it's all about in house exclusives by there 30 plus Sony owned studios world wide and begin a technology company not a
Software company trying to be a console company with there wallet , my buddy said years ago when MS entered the indrustry that they would destroy it with there sneakie tactics , guess what ? He was right %100

In the End MS is doomed by a little company named Google ! Watch see how Android/Chrome free OS takes off

The reason no one cries when PS3 gets Exclusvie whatevers with a game is because it dosent happen very often. 360 was so associated with getting exclusive DLC for pretty much everything, so when they get it, people graon, but when PS3 gets it, its no big deal.

how can you guys like a system that takes the longest to load no party no friends and a crappy controller for fps i just dont understand ps fans i have all three system the ps3 strickly 3rd person action games and movies everything els xbox360 espn last nite i watch boston put the smash down on miami after that i racked up some kills on black ops plus i have att uverse it just keep getting better ps3 fans should just give microsoft its props thats do for giving ps3 a a hellava run for its money

ps3 just sucks hard

What I do understand is how these developers have the nerve to sell me a shit product yet i have to pay the same amount as the superior version.

Thats just the way it is now, certain developers/publishers prefer one console to another.

PS3 gets/got stuff like exclusive Mafia 2 content and EA favours them.

360 gets/got exclusive Dead Rising 2 content and Activision favours them.

If you dont get the extra content for a game you like on the console you prefer, then don't you think its finally time to invest in "the other" console?

Now a days you hear about which console is going to get exclusive blah blah blah before the game is actually released.

So it's time to own both...... simple as that.

The Xbox division has not listened to the customer since the 360 days. Ever since Kinect, Microsoft has been about selling us what they want and trying to tell us it’s what we want rather than actually selling us what we are asking for.

Microsoft does have a history of running things into the ground simply because they don't innovate or give products breathing space. I fully expect in the long term they will manage the same with Call of Duty and will kill it, just as they killed Halo and Forza and many other IP's over the years. This also extends to things like windows phones and such. They just were not competitive and did not listen to consumers.

Battlefield has beaten Call of Duty in players number not in sales maybe but in players

So far everything XBox touches die...

Same shit every year, give it a rest.

If they're going to do stuff like MW3 and BLOPS 7, at least make the campaign split-screen co-op. The way the maps are structured there's no reason not to, and it just adds value to a game that's short on it as it is.

Pretty sure BF6 will “pay the bills” just fine 🤪
https://www.thegamebusiness...

COD is turning into a sports game wash, rinse, repeat. At least Ubisoft stopped doing the yearly releases with AC and it worked.

Call of Duty can die only by killing itself. This can happen to any franchise and happened to Medal of Honor which ironically was created by the original team that made Call of Duty.