All Channels
Popular
130°
10.0

Washington Post Review: Kinect motion-sensing system impresses

Washington Post: "There are a lot of futuristic things we're still waiting on: jet packs for the entire family, self-driving cars and time-travel, to name a few. But one new, pretty darn amazing bit of technology has finally come to fruition, thanks to the folks at Microsoft."

Read Full Story >>
washingtonpost.com
gigaware5669d ago (Edited 5669d ago )

It's impressive. I love playing online multi player with its mic(s) its so refreshing on the Xbox. I can have my AVR turned up high and it doesn't pic up the background noise only my voice when I speak.

As to the reported voice command issues that is related to poor calibration. During calibration in the mic setup phase Kinect will ask you to turn up the volume on your AVR/TV to listening levels. Make sure in the calibration process you actually turn it up past the loudest source content you listen to on the loudest level you may ever raise your equipment. This way you can whisper and Kinect will pick up every word.

The discrete Speaker audio sweep Kinect initiates is rather soft compared to louder source content you listen to so turn the volume during configuring.

Shazz5669d ago ShowReplies(3)
Cyrus3655669d ago Show
gigaware5669d ago (Edited 5669d ago )

I'm Bill gates ;)

And you call yourself a contributor.

shadyiswin5668d ago

Cause he knows how the sound calibration works and he's right, kinect ignores music and hears you clearly, not new technology my cell phone has noise cancellation mics, but microsoft obviously researched it and got it perfect or pretty close. Personally I rather use my hands to navigate though.

MaxOpower5668d ago

The Washington Post, were I go for all the latest video game reviews.

hellraiserpop5668d ago

That's where all the Wii crowd is.

Rainstorm815668d ago

Microsoft had to have known avg. publications like the NY times, Washington Post and all of the other non-gaming media, were going to love Kinect. This is why the highest scores are coming from them.

On the flip side its the Gaming and Tech media thats giving Kinect average to mediocre scores.

The people that this thing is targeted at probably never heard of IGN or Engadget....

BrutallyBlunt5668d ago

This is why its so refreshing knowing that all the little troll work that goes on here and other game forums doesn't have any influence whatsoever in the real world.

Now bring me all your disagrees to show me i'm right.

ct035668d ago (Edited 5668d ago )

Here's a hint: Microsoft cares way less about a review on IGN than it cares about a review in a big newspaper. Because most of the target audience does not read IGN.

Edit: This reply was supposed to be in answer to MaxOpower who completely missed the mark with his snarky statement.

shadyiswin5668d ago

Kinect is for casuals, so kinect will be reviewed by casual sites. It's not microsoft taking the easy way out, I mean the reviewers say it all. What because they enjoy it there's something wrong? The only people who won't enjoy kinect are people looking for hardcore games on it and if you purchased one thinking you were going to get one on day one you are stupid. If you like casual games it really is a no brainer. This is not a casual site so I expect backlash but not stupidity and ignorance that the casual crowd will love this. That seems to be the problem with Move, there making out to be motion gaming for the hardcore. Which is why it hardly budged there september sales because the hardcore has ps3 already, quickly being over looked as an expensive wii with out the games that make nintendo nintendo, next holiday move will be pretty much non existant but will have a cult crowd keeping it a float meanwhile kinect will have some must have title for xmas 2011 I wanna say star wars but something tells me we well never see that game.

DigitalRaptor5668d ago (Edited 5668d ago )

Is Kinect casual, or is it not?

From the Xbox fanboys "it's not meant for us, it's for the casuals". But then they like to remind us of all the upcoming hardcore titles for Kinect.

From M$ themselves at E3 "This is for Xbox 360 fans", followed by "We're not aiming this at the hardcore", followed by "Expect hardcore games within 18 months".

Obviously not all direct quotes, but near enough.

It's easy to see that both Xbox fans and Microsoft are hyping up Kinect like it's the future of gaming, and along with that it will have potential for hardcore games of the same caliber as Halo, Gears and Mass Effect.

These flip-flopping Kinect defenses need to stop.

-------------------

And to your other points. It's not surprising that because you're an Xbox fan that you think Move is a load of bollocks and that it will not be around next holiday season. You think Sony will not have games for it, and that is your own ignorant choice to believe that.

I deal in logic, and I use the facts I can find.

Move is being very well supported. It could have better marketing, but Sony doesn't need it to. Microsoft does need to market Kinect because something as expensive as that, from a company such as Microsoft will not sell itself, like the Move could.

You're guessing that Kinect will have must have titles for Xmas, but no evidence, no logic. What defines must-have? Ratings and reviews from non-gamer news sources such as this?

No Move might not yet have proved iself, but this time next year Sony will have more games supported for Move than Kinect will by a long shot. We already know about them. And many of these will be AAA PS3 titles.

JokesOnYou5668d ago (Edited 5668d ago )

"Is Kinect casual, or is it not?"

-BOTH. The launch games are intended to appeal to the casuals for obvious reasons(easier to dev/potential $$$ from an under-explored fanbase in terms of the typical 360 gamers), games coming later will appeal more to hardcore gamers.

If you expectations were reasonable you wouldn't have a problem with it....unless of course your post history is full of rants and questions about ps3 not launching with UC2. lol

BrutallyBlunt5668d ago

Why are you implying there are no must have games for Kinect when there very well could be? Black Ops could be a must have for me and Dance Central could be a must have for someone else. What defines a must have when everyone has their own input to what that is? It's no secret these early games on Kinect are not going to appeal to the Call of Duty crowd but why dismiss it as not having any games that may appeal to people?

This is an earlier comment of yours:
"But Move is still tighter and works better than Kinect. Kinect's lack of solid inputs is its own worst enemy!"

It's worst enemy? You are making it seem like Kinect is somehow limited to what games are out now? That's like saying playing Heavy Rain with the Move shows its limitations. It certainly does not. Games that are tailored around the Move like Sorcery will show what it can do. Making it as a viable option in games like Socom 4 also shows its versatility in replicating a standard dualshock. So yes, Move offers gamers choices but so does Kinect. How? Well just because Microsoft is showcasing non-controller games right now doesn't mean it's limited to only non-controller games. You can use Kinect and a controller. They obviously want to market a controller free environment right now to showcase what sets is apart from competitors.

So the real enemy here is not Kinect but those who think this is all Kinect offers with its initial line-up. Logic dictates games will expand Kinects capabilities and will also be used with a controller in some games.

Gaming is about having fun, not just about comparing it to what else is available like the Move and telling everyone how Kinect is less accurate and so on. That's not the point.

vault13er5668d ago

By your logic, you are implying that any thing can be must have as long as somebody wants it. That means Vampire Rain is a must have title despite being one of the worst video games ever made. Your logic is flawed

I'm sure the kinect offers some genres beyond it's initial lineup but there has been nothing in the pipeline or any previews for these magical games. All the same tired Wii genres that even Wii owners don't buy and find their way to the bargain bin to make more space for games they do buy.

Despite being entirely different and much more advanced then an Eyetoy technologically, I can't see them coming out with anything else we haven't already seen on that spent device because there is only so much you can do without a controller and these launch games are it

BrutallyBlunt5668d ago (Edited 5668d ago )

How can my logic be flawed if everything is based on opinions? What you are saying is if 10 review sites gave a game 10 out of 10 it automatically becomes a must have? Does this mean you go to Justin Biever concerts because he's in so much demand? ALL reviews are based off of opinions. Your Shape could easily become a must have, it's getting lots of praise and so is Kinectimals and Dance Central. All three may also become big sellers. Its way too early to tell. We need to take things in context too, Kinect is very different. Some may not enjoy being physical too long. How many adults who review games can relate to something like Kinectimals unless they have kids? So we may have polar opposites in many reviews for Kinect. In fact we have seen it already. Some like Kinect, some dont. Some like Your Shape, some dont. So who's judge and jury here on determining it from a must have to a paper weight?

What you need to bare in mind is the target audience. Justin Biever is not for me but i don't discredit him as an entertainer. He obviously connects with his target audience. So if i wrote a review on his CD's or his concerts they would likely not be very positive. So again a must have is all in relation to the consumer. Kinect may not be for you. The games may not be for you as well, but to downplay it and say it has no must have games is really biased on your part.

If one or more of the games end up selling over a million copies does that make it a must have title? Or are you then going to say it's all due to marketing?

People need to wake up, not everything revolves around them. This is why its great we have PC's, Playstation 3's, XBOX360's, Wii's, the DS, the PSP and so on. Plus peripherals like Kinect and Move, and all sorts of games aimed at different genre's and different folks. These are good times with lots of selection but some people act like they just got a knitted sweater from grandma each day. We need to be more positive and constructive. Instead we have kids who troll topics each day that want to be the vocal majority around here.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5668d ago
hikayu5668d ago (Edited 5668d ago )

and i can close my eyes and still see the giant bling M$ sent these guys as a "gift" for their fantastic review ...

Washington post , sorry i but i wouldnt wipe my butt with this crap .

feelintheflow5668d ago

Microsoft did exactly what they wanted too with this thing. All of the gaming sites give it mediocre reviews but the non gaming sites, newspapers etc., have given it pretty glorious reviews. Non gamers are eating this thing up.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5668d ago
10thnightvolley5668d ago

well from everywhere it seems kinect is getting a serious boost of credit.. all about going to the bank for MS.

BrutallyBlunt5668d ago (Edited 5668d ago )

So many were expecting this thing to fail or better yet, hoping it would. I myself am going to wait awhile in purchasing one because the games so far dont really appeal to me. That doesnt mean i'm going to troll every article on it until then. I can see the potential in this and i can also see why many will enjoy it.

It also seems to me most doubters come from those who haven't even tried it. This is where Microsoft's marketing stepped in to boost sales. By showing it on popular places like Oprah, Jimmie Fallon and Ellen, viewers feed off of others enjoying it and the excitement around it. Sure it wont matter as much to someone who plays Halo or Killzone in their bedroom with the lights out all day, but that is not the market Microsoft is going after and shouldn't go after right now. They already have those users.

This isn't all about just selling the Kinect device, its about expanding its userbase and expanding it to other areas like Live. Treating it as just a peripheral like a HD-DVD add on wont create the numbers needed to get publishers to take it seriously enough.

10thnightvolley5668d ago (Edited 5668d ago )

ya its the word of mouth about kinect which will make ppl become ambassadors for the product and tell ppl "omg have u tried this" .women clearly will eat this thing up.. so fast this holiday will make MS seriously money happy. kind of makes sense for them doing a sales blitz on the market and narrowing focus to casual so when they adopt it they can now stretch bk to the hardcore with kinect core titles.. but a smart move by them i cant lie.. pretty smart.

i am in the UK and i have to wait for 3 more days to get it.. lot of my friends and family are so hyped to get a 360 now with this... and from what i see it works pretty well.. surely some flaws but hell is a bold step in a seemly right direction kind of makes gaming feel fresh again... and this will be a major genre creator. coz devs will have to go bk and rethink how to build new types of games and IPs

5668d ago
Raendom5668d ago

I wonder if it'll do well in the UK? It comes out the day after Black Ops. Stupid time to release anything.

Show all comments (34)
20°

Joy Ride Turbo - The Beginning of the End for Xbox Kinect

Joy Ride Turbo launched 10 years ago today. The first title was Xbox Kinect exclusive, yet this sequel failed to support the device at all.

300°

10 of the Biggest Video Game Hardware Failures Ever

Cultured Vultures: "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal, and no matter how much developers might try, some gaming hardware just fails to hit the mark. We’ve compiled a list of 10 gaming hardware fails, and boy did some fail hard."

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Knightofelemia1575d ago

I would label the Power Glove, Kinect, and that Tony Hawk skateboard more as hardware addons hardware failure would be like the Virtual Boy and one day Stadia.

Magog1574d ago

Kinect was bundled with every Xbox One and inflated the price on an already underpowered and low RAM machine so for the One it wasn't an accessory as much as a white elephant.

CaptainHenry9161574d ago (Edited 1574d ago )

Definitely the RROD but that power glove had a lot of issues as well. The Kinect just didn't work

1574d ago
CrimsonWing691574d ago

Hardware add-ons are more like RAM or a video card, basically components that enhance capabilities or performance of the computer.

If you really want to get technical the Kinect is more of a peripheral device, kind of like a keyboard or mouse to a computer.

ThatsGaming1574d ago

The person in this article obviously is not up on their gaming history....

Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast, Coleco Gemini, Commodore 128, Commodore Amiga, Atari 5200, Atari 7800 were all massive failures and in most cases cost their companies participating in future gaming generations.

Gamer791574d ago

Sega saturn (successful in Japan) and dreamcast were not failures.
Seems like you're not up on you're gaming history

septemberindecember1574d ago

@Gamer79

How in the world are the Sega Saturn and Dreamcast not seen as failures? They both sold around 8M each, which is much lower than the ~30M that the Genesis had sold before it, and even the Master System before that. They were both the worst selling consoles in their respective generation (PS1, N64 outsold Saturn, PS2, GC, and Xbox outsold Dreamcast). Both of the consoles were incredibly short lived. The Saturn was discontinued in every territory but Japan after just three years. In Japan the console was discontinued after six years. Meanwhile the Dreamcast was discontinued worldwide in 2001 after launching in most territories in 1999 and in Japan in 1998. The failure of the Saturn and Dreamcast lead to Sega pulling out of the hardware market. Which, by the way, all of this occurred when Sega was massively dropping the price of their consoles quickly to compete. Sega was hemorrhaging money at this point.

None of this indicates a successful console. Saying the Saturn was a success because it did better in Japan is like saying the Vita is a success (they both sold around the same amount of units in Japan). Even the Wii U outsold these consoles worldwide.

Magog1574d ago

The picture should be the 360 RROD. When I think of gaming hardware failures that's what springs to mind. Kinect and it's bundled price tag definitely hobbled the already underpowered Xbox One though for sure so I would give it a close second place.

porkChop1574d ago (Edited 1574d ago )

That's not what the author means by failures. It's about hardware that failed in terms of sales (Wii U) or just failed to deliver on its promise (Kinect).

Magog1574d ago (Edited 1574d ago )

Given that the 360 had a year head start, much easier hardware to develop for, was cheaper, and still ended up in third place I think it qualifies especially when you factor in the frustration and huge losses incurred by RROD.

porkChop1574d ago

Selling over 80 million consoles isn't a sales flop. We get it, you don't like Xbox, but that doesn't mean the 360 is suddenly a failure.

Rhythmattic1573d ago

Porky....
You know how many people I know bought a 2nd or third 360 due to RROD? Even when MS had to confront the issue with replacement systems, my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in, and waiting for a replacement.,,..,..
If that's how you consider it a win... OK.. but so is having 5 , of which 3 don't function.... Its a win win....mwhahahahaha

porkChop1573d ago

"my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in"

You're acting like it would take months. When I sent my 360 in I got a new one literally 5 days later. As soon as MS had tracking confirmation that you sent yours, they'd send a new one to you the same day. No one is going to spend hundreds to buy a new console instead of waiting a week. I swear you guys pull some of the dumbest shit out of nowhere and think people will actually believe it.

Regardless, none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about.

Rhythmattic1573d ago (Edited 1573d ago )

Porky
"You're acting like it would take months"
Sometimes it could.. FFS.. 'Strya here...
Best turnaround I reckon was 2-3 weeks.....
Either way, My mates experiences still exist.. So Sorry, no point trying to earn Xbox Achievements when it doesn't feature in what was a situation you never dealt with,,,,
3 of my friends would disagree (overall, 10 extra Xboxes purchased)
Regardless.. MS sold a lot of 360's that was due to this reason.. That is sales. Fact

"none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about."
Headline says HELLO !
Oh and "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal," that's enough to pass this on without taking your article bias into consideration.....
As for the rest.... Ok.. But you've actually gone out of your way to give MS a Pass... Fap on.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1573d ago
Aloymetal1574d ago (Edited 1574d ago )

Yup, and because of that big fiasco MS had to fork out 1 billion but knowing them I think they're very proud of the 360, it's the only time a MS console reached 80mil+ sales, RROD played a big part of that and a record they will never break again.

Rhythmattic1573d ago (Edited 1573d ago )

So true.. Even when MS accepted they where caught out in the biggest lie of any generation, The wait for a replacement was outweighed by just buying another, and having one be returned as a backup, which, btw, generally failed on first swap.
I own honestly can't believe MS tards are just supporting , or arguing why and what MS did by just dismissing it....

lonewolf101574d ago

Lol I had the Atari Jaguar, surprised its "competition" the 3DO isn't on the list too, both as "popular" as each other.

SullysCigar1574d ago

Lol same. Played the crap out of Aliens Vs Predator and Tempest 2000 .... aaand that's about it really!!

lonewolf101574d ago

Sad but true that was pretty much it.

Kurt Russell1574d ago

Agreed, I never actually saw a 3DO make it to retailers in the UK. At least the Atari Jaguar was sold for around 6 months.

lonewolf101574d ago

It made it to some my brother got one, fared just as well as the Jaguar so most probably hard to find in general.

darthv721574d ago

3do had way better games. Jaguar not so much. Neo Geo sold less than both and yet isnt considered a failure. Go figure.

LWOGaming1574d ago

Stadia is a weird one. It hasn’t sold at all well but in terms of how it works it’s still miles ahead of Xcloud in terms of stability and performance. Xcloud is still a way behind and that needs sorting but it will be in time. Stadia for me is one of those things that will go down as a what could have been moments. With better marketing it could have been a roaring success. I still play it and it remains the best place in my opinion to play CyberPunk 2077. Only platform I have played it on without having any issues at all. The tech is great. The concept is fine. Marketing terrible. Shame really.

Magog1574d ago

The sales model was awful. They should have teamed with an existing player to allow for local and cloud access to games or a gaming subscription service.

LWOGaming1574d ago

It was a strange mess from such a huge company, as I said, as a system it works really well but without gamers it’s nothing. Such a waste,

LWOGaming1574d ago

The Xbox One was Microsoft’s Nintendo Wii U. Undercooked, undersold and just an unholy mess. The thing is with any of these failures is to learn from them and thankfully both Nintendo and Xbox did just that to the benefit of gamers everywhere.

Show all comments (39)
120°

Pivotal Decisions in Gaming History - Xbox Goes All-In on Kinect

Xbox 360's Kinect had flopped yet Microsoft insisted on mandatory Kinect for Xbox One, driving the price up and alienating their potential customers.

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
darthv721751d ago

the tech was pretty damn good but their focus on making it the centerpiece was not. Had they opted to keep it as a secondary or even tertiary device, it may have found new use for AR/VR.

PrimeVinister1751d ago

Maybe. But they were two early for VR and too late for motion control

1751d ago Replies(2)
Godmars2901751d ago

Their focus was marketing metrics. Information gathering for targeted advertising. Also "event curating" or head counting for special TV events. If MS had had their way with always online and mandatory Kinect pre COVID, as and during it they'd likely be turning into dominant presence in many Western homes. Be getting subsidized by Disney and other streamers as well as the NFL.

Thing was, Kinect as an actual game system, its games, just weren't ready. MS moved on it too soon. Thankfully.

Atticus_finch1751d ago

Sorry but it was incredibly bad for gaming. The thing barely worked as intended and the games were broken shovelware. And let's not forget all the lies from Xbox to try and sell it. What happened to Milo?
It's like Xbox it's a perpetual lying machine.

PrimeVinister1751d ago

I had almost forgotten about Milo. It looks so unbelievable in retrospect. How did anyone believe it?!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1751d ago
TheEnigma3131751d ago

Kinect requirement, TV focused, DRM, and $100 buried Xbone before it even stared.

PrimeVinister1751d ago (Edited 1751d ago )

I think Kinect was the worst of the bunch. They reversed DRM overnight and try to play down the TV stuff when they realised it made them look disinterested in gaming.

Kinect stuck around for six months, preventing sales and making more and more people upset when they dropped the Kinect and the price.

Atticus_finch1751d ago

Don't forget the inferior hardware which affects their game development to this day.
And the constant boasting and lying that hasn't change very much to this day.

kayoss1751d ago

I was kind of excited for the kinect. It had potential. That was until i tried it at one of their Microsoft store. The thing was so laggy and worker who was there, had no clue what he was doing. It kind of made rethink about buying an Xbox One with Kinect.

PrimeVinister1751d ago

I had already been turned off of the idea by Kinect for 360. Even when it worked, the games were bad and showed no potential.

Wii made you understand what they were going to do with it within about 10 seconds of Wii Sports. It went on to become a bit of a joke but at least it worked and had a purpose.

Thundercat771751d ago

The damage to the Xbox brand was so hard that til this day they are just the last place brand in the market.

PrimeVinister1751d ago

Totally. They haven't been really all that relevant since.

Godmars2901751d ago

That has to do with repeatedly failing, having to reaffirm only to again fail at creating a competent flow of decent games.

@PrimeVinister:
Until Game Pass and BC are mentioned. Only for the point to be missed.

kayoss1751d ago

thats because they dont know what they want to be. A gaming console, Television, or a gaming service?

Godmars2901750d ago

@kayoss:
They wanted, expected, to be Steam. To have everyone coming to them and paying for the privilege. That's the exact mentality on display when they tried to push always online.

brewin1750d ago

Its sad because the Xbox one version of Kinect was actually pretty solid. Not for motion games, I couldnt care less about those, but for the other features that are now commonplace in the gaming ecosystem. Things like voice control and optional motion features in games. Stuff that Sony did with the PS camera was pretty sweet and they could have done some of that stuff with Kinect.

The tech was pretty sweet when implemented right though. Who remembers the implementation in Dead Rising 3?! You could lure zombies away by saying stuff into the kinect, it was a bit hokey at first, but it actually enhanced the game significantly once you learned all the different voice commands. There was and still is nothing else like that!

The focus on TV seemed to be an issue for people, but the TV pass through had some real potential. They could have had cable companies giving the XBone out instead of cable boxes! I understood what they were trying to do, but they needed to show the games too, and thats where they lost the core gamers. Being able to jump right to a sports event or TV show with out leaving the console was actually a pretty cool thing. I spent many nights switching between NHL games or TV shows and jumping right back into my games seamlessly, just by telling Kinect to do so. It was better than people care to admit, but I loved it!

People say XBone had no games, but on launch I got Dead Rising 3, AC Black Flag, Watch Dogs, Killer Instinct, Battlefield 4, Forza 5, and Ryse. That was actually a pretty solid lineup in hindsight! Then later on it got gems like Quantum Break, Dead Rising 4, Sunset Overdrive, Gears 4 and 5, the Ori games, Rare Replay, Forza Horizon 3/4, State of Decay 2, ReCore (SUPER UNDERRATED GEM), Halo 5, Halo Wars 2, and all the great 3rd party stuff as well! I dare anyone who sat on the Xbox One to go back and give it a shot now.

It was actually a pretty great console all things considered. Yes the PS4 had better 1st party stuff, stuff that MS just couldnt top or even compete with, but there are some really great games that a lot of people missed out on that they would probably really enjoy if they actually played them. Thats why I recommend a Series S and Gamepass to a lot of people, as its a great way to get an awesome lineup pf games for super cheap!

Show all comments (22)