All Channels
Popular
140°

Microsoft Preparing PGR Return

Project Gotham Racing is being readied for a return as Microsoft shops around for a new developer to bring its high profile driving series back to the frontlines.

Read Full Story >>
xbox360.ign.com
Tommykrem5695d ago

Cool. Always liked PGR better than Forza.
But then again Bizarre won't be making this one, I suppose. Doesn't mean it's going to be bad :) I hope.

Bigpappy5695d ago

PG was a great mix of arcade and sim. Too bad I don't buy racers any more.

seinfan5695d ago

PGR4 was awful. PGR had its glory days on the original Xbox.

Xi5695d ago (Edited 5695d ago )

well, the racing part was, trick and the lap modes were great. The race ai was one of the worst versions I had ever seen, you literally had to drive perfectly to win. No matter how fast you went, the AI would always stay right behind you, which is extremely difficult in a game where there's a focus on maneuvers which tend to slow a car down.

PGR2 was pretty awesome though.

alb18995695d ago

Maybe it will go out first than GT5!

Organization XII5695d ago ShowReplies(3)
morkendo235695d ago

hmmm, seem to me FLOPZA could not beat GT5 now MS trying with PGR

kaveti66165695d ago

Forza is a great game. And it's been a year since its release and GT5 isn't out yet, so it would have been worth it to buy Forza 3 when it launched.

ALFAxD_CENTAURO5695d ago

PGR is arcade, not even near the Real Driving Simulator AKA Gran Turismo.

EvilBlackCat5695d ago (Edited 5695d ago )

since when gt series have been a sim?

PROVE it

Im a god

just because i just say it doesn't mean is real.

hm0uzy5695d ago (Edited 5695d ago )

Gt acadamic n Lucas Ordonez sais hi...u must living under the rock dude? who r u to know whats is a sim or not?give up dude, u r alone in this fantasy lol...feedback from professionals race drivers r more belived than just a kid that never drove a car.

IHateYouFanboys5695d ago

IMO they should get the guys who made NFS:Shift, Slightly Mad Studios, to make it. theyre independent so theres nothing stopping them there, and they know how to make a racing game that strikes a good balance between sim and arcade.

PGR is a great series, having basically shown the rest of the console developers how to do first-person view in car racing games, and made drifting popular in 'realistic' racers.

F4sterTh4nFTL5695d ago

Need For Speed that they can make for 3 platform whereas PGR is limited to only the Xbox 360 fanbase.

IHateYouFanboys5695d ago (Edited 5695d ago )

are you seriously asking that question?

Slightly Mad Studios dont have an exclusive deal for NFS - theyre not even making the new need for speed games. Criterion are making Need for Speed Hot Pursuit.

Burnout is a franchise owned by a publisher, and they just contract it out to developers to make games in the series. Project Gotham Racing is in the same boat - Microsoft own the IP, and are free to shop it around to any developer they want. Slightly Mad Studios arent 'tied' to Need for Speed in the slightest.

you really need to understand how franchises and IPs work before you comment.

BrutallyBlunt5695d ago

That would be a good idea. I enjoyed NFS:Shift.

Show all comments (38)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio38d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing38d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9238d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit38d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing38d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9238d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay39d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn240d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn239d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown40d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay39d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay39d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac39d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger40d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300040d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde40d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde39d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7541d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_39d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.