All Channels
Popular
110°

Infamous 2 and the Playstation Move.....Will it work?

Rumors have been rampant on Infamous 2 having Playstation Move capability. Nothing is set in stone, since Sony has not released any solid info on the topic, all we have to go off is Sucker Punch "mentioning" that Move capablity might be a good fit, and some questionable Amazon.com ads. We thought about how this might work. On one hand, it could be one of the best motion gaming experiences ever, on the other hand, it could be a tacked-on mess....We're hoping for the first option.

Read Full Story >>
asggaming.com
kmr19775694d ago

Hell yeah!

Good points though, never thought about the camera being an issue.

sinncross5693d ago

I cant see it being an issue unless SuckerPunch have no idea how to code the data...

Christopher5693d ago (Edited 5693d ago )

Personally, I think the controller will be best for games that rely on a lot of accurate navigation for platforming purposes. Remember, there's only 1 analog stick when using the wand, and relying on the wand to control camera angle takes a lot of getting used to for standard FPS, adding more complex moves on both the x and y axis would only make it harder.

Samus HD5693d ago

if they are a perfect Wii copy - maybe it could work

DaTruth5693d ago

I have the Move,but I can't see how this would work! The platforming and building climbing seems impossible.

But if they can figure out a way to make it good or even if they can't, more power to them! If I don't like it I can just play with a DS3!

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5693d ago
Troll_Police5694d ago

Why wouldn't it? Move has buttons.

Stealth20k5693d ago

but it also has motion control which is garbage

Parapraxis5693d ago (Edited 5693d ago )

Desperation trolling from Stealth20k .

Go away Stealth20k .

EDIT:
Neckbear, I didn't see where he said "I don't like motion controllers"...actually, where did you see that?

Neckbear5693d ago (Edited 5693d ago )

So, saying "I don't like motion controllers" is considered trolling?

C'mon, fella. Opinions =/= Trolling.

Edit:

Where he said they're "garbage". That's his personal opinion, and that's stating he does NOT like Motion Controllers.

plb5693d ago

Move is accurate so I wouldn't call it garbage

pixelsword5693d ago

Actually, neckbear, if he states something is garbage, then he's not giving his opinion, he is attempting to state a fact; if he says "I think" or "to me" something is garbage, then that's giving an opinion.

karl5693d ago

i think it will bring some issues .. it still needs another analog stick...

the move replace one of the analogs but there is a limit on how much u can move your arm left and right u know...

there is the other one but if u use that for rotation aswell then u are left without a way to go sideways...

although i do trust that if suckerpunch did put move into infamous2 they already have found a solution for most problems

ALFAxD_CENTAURO5693d ago

Next Generation of Motion tech.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5693d ago
Neckbear5693d ago (Edited 5693d ago )

But I still see it being somewhat awkward- compared to the superior standard controller, at least.

Eh, I think it'll depend on if you like the Move or not. Thank god they give you an option to choose whatever you want instead of saying "dis 4 moev aloen lol".

I personally will play it on a DualShock 3. I just see it being better on it- and I don't even have a Move to begin with, so yeah.

Then again, I don't know. Move for a game like inFamous...I don't see it working. I really DON'T see it working.

Parapraxis5693d ago (Edited 5693d ago )

I like the option, especially when considering I beat the first Infamous 3 times and platinumed it. A run through with Move would be cool.

I don't understand why people are against it. It's not going to be a freaking "move-only" game.

8-bit5693d ago

Resident Evil 5 is a third person shooter and I personally think it is more fun with the move controller compared to a DS3. That's my opinion.

3nd3rth35693d ago

Infamous is not really a TPS though. RE5 plays more like a tank. Chris can't jump, can't shoot while moving, can't do this, can't do that... etc... anyway, infamous is more dynamic. It's a lot less shooting and more "can i make the hover to that ledge? how long can i string riding this power line? stupid secret is on a ledge i can barely stand on one foot, gotta be perfect!" Anyway, you can't go into it thinking it's a tps and trying to apply similar controls. RE5 is very basic in comparison to infamous' movements.

King-Leonidas5693d ago

i would love to schockwave dudes by waving Move

Genecalypse5693d ago

Infamous was basically a third person shooter of sorts, I could see it working well

Taggart4515693d ago

I don't want inFamous to have Move support. Sure I love the Move and other things it's based around, but I do NOT want to see it implemented in this game.

plb5693d ago

Why? It's not like you can't use DS3 if you prefer

offdawall5693d ago

Idk but seriously the value for getting move keeps going up ...no more Heroes exclusive ..and maby INfamous 2 is insane ... Developers seem to be dying to impliment move in their games ... That should tell u something

Show all comments (39)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
32d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted32d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8532d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele31d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla31d ago (Edited 31d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk31d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay31d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 31d ago
Athlon10132d ago (Edited 32d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit31d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg31d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10131d ago (Edited 31d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14931d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
45d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_45d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle44d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker45d ago (Edited 45d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit44d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog45d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_45d ago (Edited 45d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog45d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad45d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_45d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage45d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda44d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

45d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong71d ago

looks god awful on the base systems