All Channels
Popular
260°

Microsoft Reportedly Spending Half a Billion Dollars on Kinect Campaign

As was already revealed by Microsoft as part of its Kinect launch games announcement, the company has managed to secure important Kinect appearances on both Oprah and Ellen DeGeneres as it looks to reach out to a very wide, mainstream demographic (similar to the Wii). That's just the beginning of the campaign, however, as Microsoft is spending around $500 million to ensure that Kinect hits the ground running.

Read Full Story >>
industrygamers.com
panasonic235696d ago (Edited 5696d ago )

I don't know why MS are not spending that money to beef up their 1st party studios.

Just take out 8 billion dollars and purchase

Epic Games
Take Two
MISTWALKER
Sega

GWAVE5696d ago ShowReplies(10)
niceguywii605696d ago ShowReplies(9)
TreMillz5696d ago

And im pretty sure Sega nor Take-Two and Epic would agree to be bought out by a publisher who would be exclusive to one platform. Hence why T2 considered the deal eith EA till they saw it was only a lousy 2 Billion dollar deal. Theyre worth at least 5.

TotalPS3Fanboy5695d ago (Edited 5695d ago )

they didn't spend some of those money on making sure Kinect actually works.

Philoctetes5696d ago

For whatever reason, Microsoft made the decision to rely on third party developers. It sucks for 360-only gamers, but hey, it worked out for Microsoft financially.

And of course Kinect is getting a huge marketing push. This is very similar to launching a new console. Kinect may not be the XBox 720, but it's at least the XBox 540. They're reaching out to the casual market, and breaking into a new market means a lot of money in advertising.

Charazani5696d ago

Given that Epic owns Unreal Engine, and Take Two owns the rights to arguably one of the biggest IPs in the world. With SEGA's brand name and Mistwalker (not really a huge factor here though) on top of that. I would assume collectively that is worth way way more than $500 Million.

The Wood5696d ago (Edited 5696d ago )

how can any gamer disagree with that.

Wouldn't people prefer more games over better marketing....This gen has gone anal if people prefer funds to be spent on marketing and advertising more than actual games. I understand that M+A is needed in order to let the masses know but c'mon man, surely its still about the games for us. We dont get any monetary gain by games selling 4 or 5 million. Ask any of these devs to pay your rent or give you a free game because you've lost your job. Our gain is games...the more the better.

RageAgainstTheMShine5695d ago (Edited 5695d ago )

come on N4G this should be a 1000 by now.

come on lets blow up some cover

Sony>>>>>>& gt;>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ;>>>>>>>&g t;>>>>>>>& gt;Nintendo>Microsoft

Longrod_Von_Hugendon5696d ago

Because they don't care about you the gamer they only care about their bottom line.

klashawnd5696d ago

I don't knock MS for spending their money, it's their money who am I to tell them what to do with it. But Kinect is still an expensive peripheral. If anything, why not refine Kinect some more and then bundle it with the Xbox 720 when it comes out in a few years. Kinect plus all the bells and whistles that the 720 is sure to have would make the entire Xbox console seem fresh and unique. Plus with Kinect bundled with every 720, you are guaranteed tens of millions in terms of install base for the Kinect. Then developers would have no choice but to make compelling games that best utilize the technology. MS is thinking short-term when it could do much better if it thought long-term and used that half a billion dollars on new IPs or at least something more worthwhile than a $150 peripheral.

iPad5696d ago

HOLY SH*T!

With that money, you can buy a whole bunch of studios and more important things

tinybigman5696d ago

i would have rather you'd spend that on some studios(created/purchased) than shovelware. M$ you seem to be making it very easy for me not to play your system next year other than Gear 3. why M$ why can't you use the money better then for shovelware?

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 5695d ago
donniebaseball5696d ago

@panasonic23, yeah that's a fair point. Their internal development is very weak compared to Sony. They should acquire some more developers.

Shaka2K65696d ago Show
visualb5696d ago

but this is a little much...=|

then again, its MS, they swim in money they cn spend all they want =)

lets see if kinect is worth this investment

karl5696d ago

well i would say this is the MS xbox division

if they were allowed to spend 50 millions... and even more considering games the development of kinect etc...

well.. if they dont succeed, i cant image whats gonna happen to them.

dont know how the actual MS would react

drsnobby5696d ago

You have to spend money to make money.500 million is a drop in the bucket for MS.ADVERTISING IS A COMPANYS BEST FRIEND

nickjkl5693d ago (Edited 5693d ago )

idk man even if kinect sold for 200 dollars each they would still need to sell over 2.5 million to break even and thats implying that the stores selling kinect and people who deliver kinect to the store dont get paid and even then they still have to make the money back from researching and developing kinect

and i dont see 2.5 million kinect of kinect being sold especially with the current news of it not working properly

hoops5696d ago

The art of advertising when you have huge cash lol

Motorola5696d ago

Sony arent just computers and gaming systems. They are almost anything electronic entertainment basically, so they cant afford to spend that much on ONE section of their corporation..Good for Microsoft but half a billion? Wow ok.

harrysmith5696d ago

........that is how much it costs 2 brainwash people then? L0L

jukins5696d ago

lol with that amount of money being spent i agree its not advertising but hypnotizing. sad thing is these soccer moms who watch ellen and oprah will no doubt become enamored with kinect and think its the greatest thing ever as they show off the fitness and dance games

hoops5696d ago

Thats exactly the target market and why its going to sell huge. The average xbox360 owner wont buy this at this point because of the games....but the soccer moms and non gamers will. The Wii demographics. This was MS plan all along.
And its going to work and piss off alot of people on N4G.COM

ImpartialMan5696d ago

there would be absolutely no reason to advertise so much

5696d ago
Show all comments (111)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio23d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing23d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9223d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit23d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing23d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9223d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay25d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn226d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers26d ago (Edited 26d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn225d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown25d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos26d ago (Edited 26d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay25d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay25d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac25d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger26d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300025d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde25d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood25d ago (Edited 25d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde25d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7527d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_24d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.