....he's kidding himself.

Does your mother and father play Gears or Killzone?

Kinect is looking to capture that crowld that the Wii had but could not keep them due to the lack of games support.

I am not buying Kinect for my self but will get it it for my son/daughter and wife and hope that Kinect can make them enjoy gaming as much as I do. I tried playing gears with my wife but her firsst complaint was why are there so many buttons and what happend to the A and B with platform games days.

Yeah you're probably right about lag, but what I was trying to say is that the PS-Move needs the glowing ball because the PS-Eye can't see how far away the PS-Move is without that glowing ball ecause it can't track in 3D.

With a camera like Kinect 3D tracking is where it shines and it'd be able to track an object in 3D space without the device/object having to have a ball or some type of tracking device stuck to it because it can see in 3D like our eyes.

So instead of the ball helping the PS-Eye track in 3D, the PS-eye will be doing all the work itself without any help coming from the controller if it had two extra cameras and an infrared beam.

But my idea requires Sony to make a new camera which is why I think PS-Move 2 should work like how I have described above.

I say split the 360 controller into 2 handheld controllers with an analog stick on each 2 L2,L1,R1,R2 buttons on each so fps can use kinect. Use the hh controller to walk or button pres and kinect to body track for gestures, voice commands exc. You dont need to track the cont. because kin tracks your body so they would be the same as the pad we have just split into 2. Cheap easy addition to make it work better.

You mean a "controller" with "buttons" to help out Kinect? Doesn't that actually defeat the purpose of Kinect? If Kinect ever needed such an "accessory" then it's the same as MS admitting that buttons are needed.

Well kinda but they won't be as embarrased as sony since they never said anything like ''BUTTONS ARE NOT NEEDED F**K THE CONTROLLER''...Thats what sony basically said about kinect..only its the other way around
''BUTTONS ARE ALWAYS NEEDED F**K KINECT''

While MS Says: no controller REQUIRED and they never made fun of Move or the WII with their commercials..which sony did do

Point is MS shouldn't be embarrased if they do add something extra for the Core gamers that do want that extra precision

Isn't MS slogan for Kinect "You are the controller", and also an additional accessory would make it much more expensive. MS did bash Move by saying that it's a more expensive set-up and Rare did claim that controllers are more laggy than Kinect. Anyway I'm really just trying to have a discussion with you cause you've been decent enough to answer me with a decent reply which I really appreciate.

Im just gonna leave that one alone

She wants to get that Kinect game where you put your head up her butt to make an elephant.

So what? I have played the Wii with several family members and always have a good time. I see no difference with Kinect, in fact, it will probably be more fun as I don't have to explain buttons.

Aren't controllers also being used today by the vast majority?

A blu-ray is a high def DVD? You kidding right? Try playing one in one of your "high def dvd players"..

@Strike

Try cramming 50 gigs on a single dvd, good God your logic is so full of holes. And calling other people fanboys doesn't help if your reasoning is completely faulty in itself. Get some common sense and a good education, trust me it will help you out a lot in real life.

It is a DVD, taken to the next level. It uses very similar things but enhanced versions of those things.

1. DVD's and Blu-Ray's use an optical laser to read data.
2. They are both discs.
3. Data is read off of tiny grooves embedded in the plastic of the disk.
4. Both made of plastic.

SO he is not 100% wrong, but there is no denying that a Blu-Ray is superior tech. Blu Ray movies are very nice indeed.

The only thing I hate about Blu Rays is their damn aspect ratio sometimes. Why aren't they in 16:9 and take up my whole screen? Nothing pisses me off more than having a 58" Plasma in 1080p to watch a movie on roughly half of the screen.

End of off topic statement.