320°

Player Affinity: Has Kinect Already Failed?

Myself, Jay Malone, wrote: "Kinect is releasing in the next few months and while I’m an “Xbox Guy,” this doesn’t mean that I’m necessarily excited for it. I know I’m not the only one not excited for it, but I definitely see potential, though the potential seems to fade after every game announcement I see."

Read Full Story >>
playeraffinity.com
Godmars2905638d ago

Probably says something that MS's been showing it off prematurely all this time then...

Windex5638d ago

but only few likes how it is implemented....

it was stripped of its processing chip and such.. and now it suffers from lag/glitch/inaccuracy problems...

They had to fake the whole E3 conference just to hide its problems.

I wholeheartedly agree with this guy... every time i see new videos, i get excited less and less

Godmars2905638d ago

Do have to admit, I am interested in seeing how they Steel Battalion on it.

Though I really think the game is going to be a real time version of Ring of Red. Which is twice not a bad thing.

sikbeta5637d ago (Edited 5637d ago )

Before talking about this, the better question could be:

Will kinect deliver at least half of what the MS PR-Force was promising?

We didn't see anything more like mini-games and time keeps running, Idk about you guys, but there is nothing concrete about the device more than bug-glitchy-gameplay videos and stuff like that, nothing else...

Godmars2905637d ago

They've all but already said - but not actually said - that half the basic features like voice command and object scanning wont be there at launch.

And...really just curious, but how is it that someone who agreed with my original statement got more agrees that me? I even have more disagrees.

Sorry, but what is wrong with you people?

rockleex5637d ago

Oh wait, you said Ring of Red. My bad.

Anyways from what I've heard, Steel Battalion will only have Kinect as optional.

I think it will be very limited like the Forza Kinect demos, Harry Potter Kinect showings, etc.

Godmars2905637d ago

Still, they showed it with Kinect and will likely promote it with Kinect. Downplay/ignore how it works depending on how it works with it. Just like people talk about Milo but not how there's someone with a laptop nearby during a demo.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5637d ago
8-bit5638d ago

The last two E3's told the whole story.

bjornbear5637d ago (Edited 5637d ago )

no joke! it was at E3!!

/troll

on topic - LETS WAIT UNTIL ITS RELEASED

lets not judge a products success BEFORE its released! -_- no matter how retarded it is

Imperator5638d ago

Kinect is DOA, at least in terms of core software.

OhReginald5638d ago (Edited 5638d ago )

Guys. Guys. Kinectimals has a very high chance of being 2010's game of the year.

Sheikh Yerbouti5638d ago

I'd "pew, pew" myself in the head first.

shoddy5638d ago

waveing air without feed back suck.
we need buttons that why Iphone for "hardcore" gaming suck too.

Trebius5638d ago

My friend downloaded Legend of Zelda Link to the Past on his HTC touch screen phone (same as Iphone), I couldnt even enjoy it cause there's no buttons, you cant connect the push with the reaction on the screen, so it feels very awkward.

Buttons need to be there so you can FEEL your ACTION and ASSOCIATE it with the REACTION in the screen.

shadyiswin5638d ago

Playing emulated games on a platform without buttons when the game is ment for a platform with buttons is your problem. I'm sure Wii sports would suck to play with a standard xbox controller. On that note I have a Samsung Vibrant Galaxy phone running a playstation emulator, and it works just fine. The feedback helps, I believe its called haptic feedback, mortal kombat 4 runs fine and donkey kong country is still just as fun, but in closing you don't need buttons, the games themselves have to be catered to use the platform (kinect or iphone) to there strengths.

iPad5638d ago

Why should we gamers even care?

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5637d ago
Fishy Fingers5638d ago

Aint my thing, but then, nor is Move. At least with their respective software offerings. But one things for sure, it will be successful, whether that's for dudes like us is unlikely, but it will appeal to many. It's all about the casuals.

Chris3995638d ago

Courting the casuals is like courting the weather, unpredictable. The only consistent denominator seems to be price: cheap. Kinect isn't cheap (neither is Move for that matter), so I'm not making any predictions about how it's going to go either way.

AceofStaves5638d ago

I'm not banking on Kinect having mass appeal. I think word-of-mouth will have a bigger role in its success, especially beyond the first adopter phase. If Kinect doesn't work as people expect, or if the software titles aren't enjoyable, those same casual players will have no problem passing that information on. For casuals, it's all about the fun factor and ease-of-play.

That's where Nintendo excelled. It coupled a new approach to gaming with a stable of familiar, family-friendly characters. Microsoft doesn't have that same luxury.

I'm not saying Kinect will fail, nor am I predicting that it will be a smashing success. We'll just have to wait and see. I just don't think its success is as assured as some seem to think.

Parapraxis5638d ago

I really think you should try out Move + Sports Champions Fishy, I was shocked at how accurate it was, and it was surprisingly fun as well.

Sheikh Yerbouti5638d ago

AcesofStaves...

Exactly. Nintendo as been courting families/casuals for years. Motion controls proved to be a tipping point. Neither Sony or Microsoft can replicate Nintendo's success without a strong family branding.

To many who never pick up a controller, Nintendo is gaming. Nintendo is also Mario. Mario is the de facto most trusted face in gaming to a parent. Couple that with the promise of motion controls getting your kid (and yourself) off the couch, and you can feel good as a parent buying a Wii.

Imperator5638d ago

If the 3DS drops in Nov. then Kinect is screwed. The core gamers don't want it and the casuals' attention will be focused on the new Nintendo hand held.

LordMarius5638d ago (Edited 5638d ago )

Idk about Kinect, but I think Move will do well

ozps35638d ago

A $150 hardware that does nothing compared to move, which everyone is saying is 1: 1 and it is as I have it and people are saying move is fun. Live in your fantasy world dude and ply with your $150 hardware that does nothing. Lol

palaeomerus5637d ago

Actually Move has been working pretty flaky for me on the demos, and really isn't impressing anybody I show it to.

n4gno5637d ago (Edited 5637d ago )

You don't have (like ingiomar and shadysim pathetic fanboy liar, denying facts, and praising ms eye toy 0.9):

1/ move
2/ ps3
3/ friends

so stop lying trollfanboy, every real user is impressed, like the 200 reviewers.

palaomerusdonkey, again : "Sony's primary enthusiast fanbase are a bunch of socially retarded lunatics and zealots though. Casual gamers aren't going to listen to Sony fans because they sound like deranged tools. They're more likely to shake their head or just point and laugh. "

say the blind redneck who don't want to see reality : best hardware, best games, best motion controlers (just facts : check the reviews), sony fanbase are just gamers who like quality and variety..simple.

"but I think Move will do well #3 "

it's not the future : already sold out almost everywhere, first week.

ingiomar5638d ago

Kinect will sell better then move thats for sure

shadyiswin5637d ago

The kinect is already outselling the move lol based on pre orders alone, you guys need to smarten up even if you hate kinect you know it will be all over ebay overpriced, I'm gonna make $1,000 profit, if not I'll return them lol, my goal is to let people buy mines for me, pre ordered 3 bundles, they will easily go for $500, living in ny there's about 12 gamestops in a 20 mile radius, btw they all have tons of moves left, I thought about buying some to sell, the demand isn't high at all, you can get it off ebay for cheaper with more stuff go figure.

niceguyWii35637d ago

why is their a new kinectaHALOmals game coming out?

LarsoVanguard5637d ago

Who cares?

Sales don't mean shit to a gamer. The only thing that does is the quality of the experience. If Kinect can offer me a solid experience, I'll add it to my collection which includes Move AND Wii. If it turns out to be shit, then it sucks.

No matter how well it sells, it's still worthless if it's shit.

KinivingReviving5638d ago

It's definitely on its dying breaths

RagingCajun5638d ago

I feel the same. Microsoft isn't helping its case either.

feelintheflow5638d ago

and it may never be. This guy in the article is crying about a lack of hardcore games. Um, they aren't making this for you, no matter what they say, it is for the 12 year old girl and the family that wants to play those type of games. My brother in law already pre-ordered it. His 8 year old daughter wanted it. I still go over to his house and we do wii party games for a few hours and drink beer. Microsofts big problem is they act like this is for everyone. Its not. IF you are a hardcore gamer, and you don't have an xbox360, you probably never will at this point. So they don't care if the hardcore gamer picks it up. Hence the lack of hardcore titles for it. I am so sick of hearing this. It won't flop, because it will sell like crazy. Doesn't mean its quality, but it will sell.

gcolley5638d ago

i agree. i dont want hardcore motion games on wii, move or kinect. hardcore games don't even want to be on them themselves. i want party games like you said with alcohol involved.

JackBNimble5638d ago (Edited 5638d ago )

I agree with you about one thing, and that is it will sell, and probably very well at first atleast untill the novelty of kinect wears off.I think it will sell because most people are miss informed about kinect, forum goers and sites like n4g represent very small precentage of gamers.

MS could turn kinect around though if they focussed on core gamers aswell, they need to try to get away from the " you are the controller " gimmick and utilise a kinect/controller hybrid for the hard core and even the casual. If MS would use kinect in this way then I believe it could be huge.

shadyiswin5637d ago

We don't want hardcore games on kinect cause there ment for controllers, like I said youtube killzone 3 on move doesn't get more hardcore than that and all it shows is how great using a controller is. Don't get confused just cause the game isn't hardcore doesn't mean its a simple game. Think super nintendo, still has some of the hardest games I've played. I'm hoping for easy to learn hard to master gameplay, not bloody shooters or massive rpg's. Just fun relaxing games you know for the casual gamer.

Oh no I have kinect now, I won't have shooters to play cause my halo reach some how has evaporated cause I like to play casual games too so there's no way I can do both lol, you hardcore guys are well......hardcore so stick to your controllers, I will post pics from the kinect party I'm having. Beer pong, kinect, music,lots of girls Nuff said.

Moonboots5637d ago

ON it's dying breaths and it hasn't released yet??

Does this place do any type of moderation for trolling when it comes to 360 articles here??

Do they not have a staff on N4G that monitors this section? Just wondering but people sure do troll it up around here BIGTIME when it comes to MS.

jjmtf225638d ago

I agree that we will have to wait and see. The DS had terrible release games and has now almost sold as much as the PS2. Don't write it off just yet.

Show all comments (97)
20°

Joy Ride Turbo - The Beginning of the End for Xbox Kinect

Joy Ride Turbo launched 10 years ago today. The first title was Xbox Kinect exclusive, yet this sequel failed to support the device at all.

300°

10 of the Biggest Video Game Hardware Failures Ever

Cultured Vultures: "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal, and no matter how much developers might try, some gaming hardware just fails to hit the mark. We’ve compiled a list of 10 gaming hardware fails, and boy did some fail hard."

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Knightofelemia1500d ago

I would label the Power Glove, Kinect, and that Tony Hawk skateboard more as hardware addons hardware failure would be like the Virtual Boy and one day Stadia.

Magog1499d ago

Kinect was bundled with every Xbox One and inflated the price on an already underpowered and low RAM machine so for the One it wasn't an accessory as much as a white elephant.

CaptainHenry9161499d ago (Edited 1499d ago )

Definitely the RROD but that power glove had a lot of issues as well. The Kinect just didn't work

1499d ago
CrimsonWing691499d ago

Hardware add-ons are more like RAM or a video card, basically components that enhance capabilities or performance of the computer.

If you really want to get technical the Kinect is more of a peripheral device, kind of like a keyboard or mouse to a computer.

ThatsGaming1499d ago

The person in this article obviously is not up on their gaming history....

Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast, Coleco Gemini, Commodore 128, Commodore Amiga, Atari 5200, Atari 7800 were all massive failures and in most cases cost their companies participating in future gaming generations.

Gamer791499d ago

Sega saturn (successful in Japan) and dreamcast were not failures.
Seems like you're not up on you're gaming history

septemberindecember1499d ago

@Gamer79

How in the world are the Sega Saturn and Dreamcast not seen as failures? They both sold around 8M each, which is much lower than the ~30M that the Genesis had sold before it, and even the Master System before that. They were both the worst selling consoles in their respective generation (PS1, N64 outsold Saturn, PS2, GC, and Xbox outsold Dreamcast). Both of the consoles were incredibly short lived. The Saturn was discontinued in every territory but Japan after just three years. In Japan the console was discontinued after six years. Meanwhile the Dreamcast was discontinued worldwide in 2001 after launching in most territories in 1999 and in Japan in 1998. The failure of the Saturn and Dreamcast lead to Sega pulling out of the hardware market. Which, by the way, all of this occurred when Sega was massively dropping the price of their consoles quickly to compete. Sega was hemorrhaging money at this point.

None of this indicates a successful console. Saying the Saturn was a success because it did better in Japan is like saying the Vita is a success (they both sold around the same amount of units in Japan). Even the Wii U outsold these consoles worldwide.

Magog1499d ago

The picture should be the 360 RROD. When I think of gaming hardware failures that's what springs to mind. Kinect and it's bundled price tag definitely hobbled the already underpowered Xbox One though for sure so I would give it a close second place.

porkChop1499d ago (Edited 1499d ago )

That's not what the author means by failures. It's about hardware that failed in terms of sales (Wii U) or just failed to deliver on its promise (Kinect).

Magog1499d ago (Edited 1499d ago )

Given that the 360 had a year head start, much easier hardware to develop for, was cheaper, and still ended up in third place I think it qualifies especially when you factor in the frustration and huge losses incurred by RROD.

porkChop1499d ago

Selling over 80 million consoles isn't a sales flop. We get it, you don't like Xbox, but that doesn't mean the 360 is suddenly a failure.

Rhythmattic1499d ago

Porky....
You know how many people I know bought a 2nd or third 360 due to RROD? Even when MS had to confront the issue with replacement systems, my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in, and waiting for a replacement.,,..,..
If that's how you consider it a win... OK.. but so is having 5 , of which 3 don't function.... Its a win win....mwhahahahaha

porkChop1498d ago

"my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in"

You're acting like it would take months. When I sent my 360 in I got a new one literally 5 days later. As soon as MS had tracking confirmation that you sent yours, they'd send a new one to you the same day. No one is going to spend hundreds to buy a new console instead of waiting a week. I swear you guys pull some of the dumbest shit out of nowhere and think people will actually believe it.

Regardless, none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about.

Rhythmattic1498d ago (Edited 1498d ago )

Porky
"You're acting like it would take months"
Sometimes it could.. FFS.. 'Strya here...
Best turnaround I reckon was 2-3 weeks.....
Either way, My mates experiences still exist.. So Sorry, no point trying to earn Xbox Achievements when it doesn't feature in what was a situation you never dealt with,,,,
3 of my friends would disagree (overall, 10 extra Xboxes purchased)
Regardless.. MS sold a lot of 360's that was due to this reason.. That is sales. Fact

"none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about."
Headline says HELLO !
Oh and "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal," that's enough to pass this on without taking your article bias into consideration.....
As for the rest.... Ok.. But you've actually gone out of your way to give MS a Pass... Fap on.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1498d ago
Aloymetal1499d ago (Edited 1499d ago )

Yup, and because of that big fiasco MS had to fork out 1 billion but knowing them I think they're very proud of the 360, it's the only time a MS console reached 80mil+ sales, RROD played a big part of that and a record they will never break again.

Rhythmattic1499d ago (Edited 1499d ago )

So true.. Even when MS accepted they where caught out in the biggest lie of any generation, The wait for a replacement was outweighed by just buying another, and having one be returned as a backup, which, btw, generally failed on first swap.
I own honestly can't believe MS tards are just supporting , or arguing why and what MS did by just dismissing it....

lonewolf101499d ago

Lol I had the Atari Jaguar, surprised its "competition" the 3DO isn't on the list too, both as "popular" as each other.

SullysCigar1499d ago

Lol same. Played the crap out of Aliens Vs Predator and Tempest 2000 .... aaand that's about it really!!

lonewolf101499d ago

Sad but true that was pretty much it.

Kurt Russell1499d ago

Agreed, I never actually saw a 3DO make it to retailers in the UK. At least the Atari Jaguar was sold for around 6 months.

lonewolf101499d ago

It made it to some my brother got one, fared just as well as the Jaguar so most probably hard to find in general.

darthv721499d ago

3do had way better games. Jaguar not so much. Neo Geo sold less than both and yet isnt considered a failure. Go figure.

LWOGaming1499d ago

Stadia is a weird one. It hasn’t sold at all well but in terms of how it works it’s still miles ahead of Xcloud in terms of stability and performance. Xcloud is still a way behind and that needs sorting but it will be in time. Stadia for me is one of those things that will go down as a what could have been moments. With better marketing it could have been a roaring success. I still play it and it remains the best place in my opinion to play CyberPunk 2077. Only platform I have played it on without having any issues at all. The tech is great. The concept is fine. Marketing terrible. Shame really.

Magog1499d ago

The sales model was awful. They should have teamed with an existing player to allow for local and cloud access to games or a gaming subscription service.

LWOGaming1499d ago

It was a strange mess from such a huge company, as I said, as a system it works really well but without gamers it’s nothing. Such a waste,

LWOGaming1499d ago

The Xbox One was Microsoft’s Nintendo Wii U. Undercooked, undersold and just an unholy mess. The thing is with any of these failures is to learn from them and thankfully both Nintendo and Xbox did just that to the benefit of gamers everywhere.

Show all comments (39)
120°

Pivotal Decisions in Gaming History - Xbox Goes All-In on Kinect

Xbox 360's Kinect had flopped yet Microsoft insisted on mandatory Kinect for Xbox One, driving the price up and alienating their potential customers.

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
darthv721676d ago

the tech was pretty damn good but their focus on making it the centerpiece was not. Had they opted to keep it as a secondary or even tertiary device, it may have found new use for AR/VR.

PrimeVinister1676d ago

Maybe. But they were two early for VR and too late for motion control

1676d ago Replies(2)
Godmars2901676d ago

Their focus was marketing metrics. Information gathering for targeted advertising. Also "event curating" or head counting for special TV events. If MS had had their way with always online and mandatory Kinect pre COVID, as and during it they'd likely be turning into dominant presence in many Western homes. Be getting subsidized by Disney and other streamers as well as the NFL.

Thing was, Kinect as an actual game system, its games, just weren't ready. MS moved on it too soon. Thankfully.

Atticus_finch1676d ago

Sorry but it was incredibly bad for gaming. The thing barely worked as intended and the games were broken shovelware. And let's not forget all the lies from Xbox to try and sell it. What happened to Milo?
It's like Xbox it's a perpetual lying machine.

PrimeVinister1676d ago

I had almost forgotten about Milo. It looks so unbelievable in retrospect. How did anyone believe it?!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1676d ago
TheEnigma3131676d ago

Kinect requirement, TV focused, DRM, and $100 buried Xbone before it even stared.

PrimeVinister1676d ago (Edited 1676d ago )

I think Kinect was the worst of the bunch. They reversed DRM overnight and try to play down the TV stuff when they realised it made them look disinterested in gaming.

Kinect stuck around for six months, preventing sales and making more and more people upset when they dropped the Kinect and the price.

Atticus_finch1676d ago

Don't forget the inferior hardware which affects their game development to this day.
And the constant boasting and lying that hasn't change very much to this day.

kayoss1676d ago

I was kind of excited for the kinect. It had potential. That was until i tried it at one of their Microsoft store. The thing was so laggy and worker who was there, had no clue what he was doing. It kind of made rethink about buying an Xbox One with Kinect.

PrimeVinister1676d ago

I had already been turned off of the idea by Kinect for 360. Even when it worked, the games were bad and showed no potential.

Wii made you understand what they were going to do with it within about 10 seconds of Wii Sports. It went on to become a bit of a joke but at least it worked and had a purpose.

Thundercat771676d ago

The damage to the Xbox brand was so hard that til this day they are just the last place brand in the market.

PrimeVinister1676d ago

Totally. They haven't been really all that relevant since.

Godmars2901676d ago

That has to do with repeatedly failing, having to reaffirm only to again fail at creating a competent flow of decent games.

@PrimeVinister:
Until Game Pass and BC are mentioned. Only for the point to be missed.

kayoss1676d ago

thats because they dont know what they want to be. A gaming console, Television, or a gaming service?

Godmars2901676d ago

@kayoss:
They wanted, expected, to be Steam. To have everyone coming to them and paying for the privilege. That's the exact mentality on display when they tried to push always online.

brewin1675d ago

Its sad because the Xbox one version of Kinect was actually pretty solid. Not for motion games, I couldnt care less about those, but for the other features that are now commonplace in the gaming ecosystem. Things like voice control and optional motion features in games. Stuff that Sony did with the PS camera was pretty sweet and they could have done some of that stuff with Kinect.

The tech was pretty sweet when implemented right though. Who remembers the implementation in Dead Rising 3?! You could lure zombies away by saying stuff into the kinect, it was a bit hokey at first, but it actually enhanced the game significantly once you learned all the different voice commands. There was and still is nothing else like that!

The focus on TV seemed to be an issue for people, but the TV pass through had some real potential. They could have had cable companies giving the XBone out instead of cable boxes! I understood what they were trying to do, but they needed to show the games too, and thats where they lost the core gamers. Being able to jump right to a sports event or TV show with out leaving the console was actually a pretty cool thing. I spent many nights switching between NHL games or TV shows and jumping right back into my games seamlessly, just by telling Kinect to do so. It was better than people care to admit, but I loved it!

People say XBone had no games, but on launch I got Dead Rising 3, AC Black Flag, Watch Dogs, Killer Instinct, Battlefield 4, Forza 5, and Ryse. That was actually a pretty solid lineup in hindsight! Then later on it got gems like Quantum Break, Dead Rising 4, Sunset Overdrive, Gears 4 and 5, the Ori games, Rare Replay, Forza Horizon 3/4, State of Decay 2, ReCore (SUPER UNDERRATED GEM), Halo 5, Halo Wars 2, and all the great 3rd party stuff as well! I dare anyone who sat on the Xbox One to go back and give it a shot now.

It was actually a pretty great console all things considered. Yes the PS4 had better 1st party stuff, stuff that MS just couldnt top or even compete with, but there are some really great games that a lot of people missed out on that they would probably really enjoy if they actually played them. Thats why I recommend a Series S and Gamepass to a lot of people, as its a great way to get an awesome lineup pf games for super cheap!

Show all comments (22)