All Channels
Popular
310°

Top 5 Games That Need Blu-Ray

NowGamer: Following Microsoft UK exec Stephen McGill's question - "who needs Blu-ray?" here's a quick reminder of the games that wouldn't exist without the high capacity disc format...

Read Full Story >>
nowgamer.com
dosgrtr5721d ago (Edited 5721d ago )

no god of war 3,why?the damn game is over 40 gigs
except for that,nice list

UNCyrus5721d ago (Edited 5721d ago )

7.1 uncompressed audio and that intro sequence alone is enough to fill up a DVD

To the disagrees... I work at sony, I know how big that opening scene package file is. You're just proving me right

kaveti66165721d ago

Oh, yeah? What exactly is your title at Sony? Because there are janitors working at Sony.

Letros5721d ago

Uncompressed audio takes up a ton of space, think about how many more songs you can fit on a CD as an MP3 as opposed to a WAV file...

Sunny_D5721d ago

Lol, just to give you a hint... He's Cyrus from THE TESTER show that he won. So, yeah He does work at Sony and more than just a janitor. ;)

paintsville5720d ago

Sure you work at Sony..(rolling eyes).

Well I work at NASA as a Rocket Scientist.

To say that games wouldn't exist just isn't accurate. Developers need to be given more credit than that. Given the talent that exists in the industry today I'm sure that ALL of these games would have existed without the existence of bluray. I have much more faith in the industry than that.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5720d ago
dangert125721d ago

This guy don't know what his talking about, he said he exspects microsoft to make a new FPS IP and then microsoft say They need more halo,

Then he says We don't need blu ray
But i pretty much like
MGS 4
Uncharted 2
and
GOW 3

dangert125721d ago

oh and

Halo odst
Forza Motorsports 3
Lost odessy

3 games that could do with blu ray ;)

raztad5721d ago

ffxiii is a game that sorely needed a larger media than the xbox provides.

TABSF5721d ago (Edited 5721d ago )

Who needs discs at all

I have 186 games on Steam
One friend of mine has not purchased a physical copy of a game since 2005

LOL at the people disagreeing

Loading games off discs is 1992 technology, read speeds are around 25MB/s on BD
Playing games off 2TB HDD or SSD you get read speeds of around 70MB/s to 230MB/s

garos825721d ago

if i get games like uncharted 2,gow3, heavy rain, mgs4 running at 25mb/s i cant complain. i hate digital distribuition. my collection is sitting on my dvd rack looking at me and reminding me of the lovely games i own. best part is i can lend them to my friends and family no sweat.
i dont think ill ever like the idea of d.distribution even if i had crazy connection speeds koreans and japanese people have.

hoops5721d ago (Edited 5721d ago )

What Sony and MS and Nintendo should do is have whatever optical media they want to use, JUST HAVE THEM INSTALL ALL THE GAMES TO THE HDD. You still have the physical copy, you just don't have the game running off slow ass optical media.
Full install on fast drives by passes the horrendous load times and pauses you see with most console games

Edit below:
I am not talking about this generation. I am talking abut next. 1-3TB drives should be cheap and even having SSD to work with it should come down in cost in the next 2-3 years.
You can put a lot of games on a 2TB drive. If you need space, you uninstall it, but it keeps your saved files so all your stats are intact.
It's a win win. You still keep the physical copy, but get the benifits PC gamers had for years. Full intsall, qucik load times. Faster gameplay.
I cannot imagine Sony or MS not doing this next generation

shysun5721d ago

I have to many games to install them all on my HDD. And at the rate my 360 keeps breaking(3) I don't want to keep transferring data.

TABSF5721d ago

Optical media bottle necks systems and increases latency time FACT

Schobeleth5721d ago (Edited 5721d ago )

But not everyone has broadband, or a fast connection for that matter. A huge chunk of the gaming population can't afford or doesn't like the thought of complete digital games. I think it's a great option, it helps cut out distribution costs and such but there's always that fear of something bad happening and you lose everything, only to have to download it again.

Also, I have around 40-50 PS3 games.. most of them exclusives, several multiplats as well but I only have a 40gb PS3 for now, I've been holding off getting a bigger HDD.

One more thing, with some of the bigger, more ridiculous AAA games that are PS3 exclusive.. the filesizes are huge for sure. I simply do NOT want to have to download a game that big, ever.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5721d ago
hoops5721d ago

You are going to get disagrees up the ass on N4G.COM for saying this because the Sony horde will say how Blu-Ray makes graphics and it's sooo much faster to run games off it than SSD or HDD........
I love this site! Full of 12 year old noobs.
Your post nailed it TABSF

yewles15721d ago (Edited 5721d ago )

Poor Hoops, failing again to hide his discontent at the fact that the PS3 even exists. XD

shysun5721d ago

Steam is great but on consoles blu-ray is needed. Plus a lot of people like to have a physical disc and there's that trade in value.

TABSF5721d ago

Gameplay is a great example

I have Fallout 3 on PC
My bro has Fallout 3 on PS3

I can boot the game and fast travel from Megaton to RavenRock is around 30 seconds
My bro just to boot the game takes around 2 minutes, then another 1 min to load the save file and then another 1 min to fast travel

So PC HDD = around 30 seconds
So PS3 BD = around 4 minutes

bjornbear5721d ago (Edited 5721d ago )

build a PC and sell it off as a console...

?!?!?!
agree, next gen will be based on huge HDD

then again, you have games with 35Gb (GOWIII, MGS4) even a HDD isn't easy (unless 1TB hard drives become accessible to instal in consoles)

hoops5721d ago

What do you think consoles are now? LOL
They come with HDD. They come with patches. They come with all the connections PC have. They are PC's just closed and not upgradable. They hook up to the internet.
I cannot see how anyone can disagree with having full game installs on you console and have it optimized for it.
You still keep the physical disk..you just don't run it off the disk which is 1990's technology.
People who disagree with this are brain dead.

It's a win win and in reality even a Sony executive said he would be surprised if the next generation of consoles ran games of disks.

http://www.digitaltrends.co...

http://www.1up.com/news/son...

shysun5721d ago

There's not enough room on the damn HDD. Stuff like steam works because they save the game on their servers! It wont work on consoles..yet.

TABSF5721d ago (Edited 5721d ago )

I don't think you understand how computers or how Steam works

"There's not enough room on the damn HDD"
Yeah because 25GB Blu Ray is more than 2TB HDD

"Stuff like steam works because they save the game on their servers!"
Steam has thousands of servers all over the world, you download the games to your local system (PC or Mac). You must be thinking of OnLive.

"It wont work on consoles..yet.
It could work on DS, PSP, Wii, 360 and PS3 right now

I have 186 games on Steam in total it adds to 578GB.
My largest game on my Drive is Star Wars the Force Unleashed 28GB
Others like GTA IV at 15GB and Aliens vs Predator at 16GB

shysun5721d ago (Edited 5721d ago )

So good luck with a 600 GB Hdd from M$ Im saying that I can have 300 50 GB blu-ray games! Fit that on you hdd.

KongRudi5721d ago

I don't think that the size is the main problem with the DVD-format, if you want to you can split things up into more than one disk, much more than it's beeing done today.
I think that the main problem, is that decision-makers see a post where they can cut costs..

It's the same problem with Bluray, however there the 'problem' ceases to be a 'problem' quicker.

That means that; when for example Bobby Kotick want to impress the Activision shareholders, with his mad elite managing skills, he storms into the developer-studio yelling: 'We need to cut more costs now - this is way to expensive!! Get the game down to a single disk or you're fired!'

Then the developers can stop using higher compression or cutting content in their product as soon as they reach 25/50 GB for the cheapest option to ship the product, on one disk.
While if you use DVD distribution the same developers will probably need to need to get this down to at 4/8GB.

After this have been done, Bobby can go back to the board-room bragging about how he has single-handedly been able to save 50% of the shipment- and pressing time- costs.

With the digital distribution option, there is other factors, no disk costs but bandwith fee wich they are beeing charged, by ISP or the online-stores (i.e. PSN charges publishers 19 cent pr GB), in addition to how much time the developer/publisher thinks the consumer is willing to wait until the game has been downloaded to the HDD, or how much space he is willing to set aside for that game.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5721d ago
kaveti66165721d ago

Console manufacturers like control.

People praise Sony for making a great console with new technology.

Their minds fail to grasp that Sony's intention in making a console is to control how people play games.

PCs give people more freedom.

If Sony wanted they could just stop making consoles and start developing games for PC. They could distribute their games through STEAM and make more profit. They wouldn't need Blu-Ray for gaming and they wouldn't need to invest billions of dollars in R&D just to make a new processor and new GPU.

But Sony loves control.

PC is better and digital distribution isn't the "future." It's happening right now.

Console gamers talk about digital distribution as if it's some unfeasible concept that won't take off. They don't even want to admit that it exists right now and brings in more money annually than physical distribution games on consoles.

And the fact is, the way console manufacturers are, they literally force their consumers to live in the past. MS is forcing you to deal with DVD, and Sony is forcing you to deal with a glorified DVD called Blu Ray. It's just a bigger box for storing your shit, so why not go one better and just buy a large hard-drive or even a NAS. you can hold 4 terabytes of information for a couple hundred bucks. That's all the games you'll ever play.

Console gamers are living in the fucking past. I popped in Halo Reach and was impressed by the scale of Forge World. But then I saw a vid of Stalker on PC and realized how Forge World is nothing compared to even a mediocre game on PC.

Sony will never let its games go to PC until they realize that losing billions of dollars on making consoles is not going to work anymore, and then you'll see them switch to being PC publishers.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5721d ago
hoops5721d ago

The real future of gaming will be next geenration for consoles IF they ditch optical media to RUN GAMES like Blu-Ray or DVD-9 and us massive HDD or SSD to have games installed.
You get the physical copy of the game on whatever media the system will support, but the games are all installed fully on those drives.
Result: Faster load times. No need to worry about disk space, reading the disk.
Blu-Ray and DVD-9, HD-DVD and the rest are too slow.
Run your games off SSD or faster HDD and thats the real edge...
PC's do it now.

DeathGazer5721d ago

Blu-ray: "Who needs Microsoft?"

Gonna agree with Blu-ray on this one.

dosgrtr5721d ago (Edited 5721d ago )

that there should always be an OPTION to buy a game either on disc or digital format,a lot of the countries don't have good enough net connections to go digital only

so the guys having super fast connections can have their digital copy and for those without them can have their physical copy,so both win

also,i definitely prefer having a physical collection of games,it just looks nice

Show all comments (37)
120°

Final Fantasy and SaGa series veteran Kazuyuki Shindo leaves Square Enix after 27 years

Kazuyuki Shindo, who worked on games including Legend of Mana, Final Fantasy XIII, and SaGa: Emerald Beyond, has left Square Enix.

Read Full Story >>
automaton-media.com
180°

Uncharted 2 Is the Most Important PlayStation Exclusive of All Time

In a list of games that defined the PlayStation 3, Uncharted 2: Among Thieves would certainly be one of the top contenders. The blockbuster sequel to 2007’s Uncharted: Drake’s Fortune not only received critical acclaim and became a massive hit for Sony’s third console when it was released 15 years ago on October 13th, 2009, but it also cemented Naughty Dog’s future as a developer of cinematic, story-driven action-adventure games as opposed to its history of colorful platformers like Crash Bandicoot and Jak and Daxter from previous PlayStation generations. To this day, Uncharted 2 stands as one of the PS3’s best exclusives and one of the most important PlayStation games of all time.

gold_drake561d ago

it was pretty good. especially the multiplayer

KyRo561d ago

I loved this era on multiplayer games from Sony. People used to call the modes tacked on multiplayer but they were enjoyable. I loved Factions even more. I'm Still gutted that the second one isn't coming out.

-Foxtrot561d ago

Yeah, that one game where it not only has an amazing single player but the multiplayer was also just as good.

A fresh a breath air with it's more "skill focused, less is more" multiplayer in a time during COD fever where every other game with online was trying to be like it.

Shame NaughtyDog eventually did do COD like things with Uncharted 3 and 4, they ruined what made the original so good. It become an over the top arcade fest in the end.

Inverno561d ago

Ironic cause the MP was basically Halo, and Bungie helped on the technical side of things too. MP was more simple back then, I've said this before but I played U2 MP religiously. I sucked at it like you have no idea, but mah gawd did I have so much fun. Can't find an MP game that hooked me like U2s these days. Then Factions came along and while it had its problem I found new religion with it. Agh damn it why did they cancel Factions 2 bruhh.

gold_drake561d ago

i had so much fun too, played almost every night with mates or cousins baha

Relientk77561d ago

It is for sure my favorite game in the series. It's such a blast to play. The train levels still hold up and are fun as hell as well as the entire game.

RaidenBlack561d ago (Edited 561d ago )

Still remember the first gameplay video ... shooting the chasing truck and then the beautiful visuals & details whilst traversing the dilapidated Nepal streets ... perfection
Too bad Sony never ported the trilogy to PC ...

RaiderNation561d ago

I would argue it's God of War.

darthv72561d ago

I'll say, the PS3 really did sequels better than people give it credit for. Resistance 2, Uncharted 2, Motorstorm Pacific Rift, Infamous 2... all were better than their initial offerings and still hold up to this day.

Show all comments (23)
50°

Uncharted Cast Doesn’t Take the Games’ Success For Granted at MCM Comic-Con

During MCM Comic Con London X EGX, CGM got the chance to be part of a press group interview with the stars of the Uncharted titles, namely the legendary Nolan North, who played protagonist Nathan Drake, Emily Rose, who portrayed Elena Fisher and Richard McGonagle, who took on the role of Victor ‘Sully’ Sullivan,

Read Full Story >>
cgmagonline.com