All Channels
Popular
440°

Next Xbox "years away", says Microsoft

Microsoft's Xbox & Entertainment Director Stephen McGill has suggested that we won't be seeing a successor to the Xbox 360 for a good few years yet, saying that the firm are "years away from contemplating what comes next".

Read Full Story >>
gamerzines.com
Xwow20085725d ago (Edited 5725d ago )

wait and see, thats all i can say .

imvix5725d ago

Both the console makers incurred heavy losses this generation. Releasing Move and Kinect this late in the generation is a delay tactic. I think they probably are under pressure from their share holders to turn a profit which will take a while. Releasing another console at this point in time will only mean more losses for the both of them.

theKiller5725d ago (Edited 5725d ago )

oops, did i say 2012? at the world crisis/end times/Zionist/freemasons plot against the poor people? what ever so i think MS wont hurry too much because they need to recover from their loses and will play it more careful this time!!

it would be good if all console release their next consoles in 2013 or even 2014!! but i can only think of PS3 making it that far!!! MS tech is too dated already!! and wii is not a current gen console except its user interface interaction!! the only thing which will make MS last longer or shorter is the success of the Kinect!! so if Kinect fails to achieve the MS goals then expect a new console in 2011 or 2012.

so i think the next wii and 360 would be in 2012 while ps3 in 2013, or wii/360 would be in 2013 and ps3 2014!!

it is for our own benefit and the console makers to make the console lifespam and its support longer!! who wants to fork out 300-500 USD next year for a new console with little software? and i dont think MS/Sony/Nindendo want to lose billions for making a new console every 5 years!!

MrMccormo5725d ago (Edited 5725d ago )

Who is to say Microsoft will even launch a console next generation? "Next Xbox years away" very well might mean 10 or 15 years from now.

Since gamers LOVE to talk sales and percentages so much, I'm surprised they are so unaware of the business going on at Microsoft:
- executives are DROPPING LIKE FLIES from the Xbox division
- the division is losing money big time
- they are closing and consolidating studios (a very common method of saving money, in case you didn't know)
- there is less and less of that infamous "exclusive DLC" they are so famous for buying

These are simple facts. Click disagree if you want, but you cannot deny facts.

@ below

Oh, your absolutely right. Sony isn't in perfect shape, either. However, they are making a ton of money in their gaming division through the PSP and PS2. And the PS3's hand in making Blu Ray the standard new def has already given them billions of $$$, so I do feel it balances out.

Substance1015725d ago (Edited 5725d ago )

While its true Xbox division isnt making much. However Sony is in a much worse position, they announced a 850million usd loss last year alone. Microsoft is atleast making piddly profits now lol.

Its not like i like microsoft, hell i hate the company. But financial facts are facts.

@above

Sony arent making a ton of money, in fact even in the last quarter the entire gaming division combined made a loss. People disagreeing need to check financials, hitting the disagree button wont make Sony profit all of a sudden.

Bucky Sligo5725d ago

"Microsoft's Entertainment and Devices Division, the portion of the giant company responsible for Xbox operations (as well as Zune and Games for Windows) brought in $165 million in profits during the company's third quarter of fiscal 2010, which ended March 31. In the same period last year, the division lost $41 million."
http://www.joystiq.com/2010...

"Early this morning, Sony issued its final results for the 12 months ending March 31, 2010. Its overall shortfall was slightly less than indicated in Monday's guidance revision, with the electronics giant posting an annual loss of ¥40.66 billion ($435.6 million) on revenues of ¥7.214 trillion ($77.28 billion). That was an improvement on the ¥98.59 billion ($1.05 billion) loss it posted a year prior, although revenues fell from ¥7.730 trillion ($82.84 billion). The loss was also $316.4 million less than the ¥70 billion ($752 million) deficit it had predicted in February."
http://www.gamespot.com/ps3...

Both companies are doing better but to me it seems like Sony is bleeding more than MS with the PS3. From a financial point of view, Msoft is doing much better than Sony in the entertainment division. I'm not a finance wizz so correct me if I'm wrong.

caladbolg7775725d ago

Is it possible that the MS numbers that you posted only include the numbers from the entertainment division (and not the marketing division, windows division, mobile division, etc) while the Sony numbers you posted are all inclusive (PS3, Televisions, portable music players, etc)? If this is the case, don't you think it's like comparing apples to oranges?

Substance1015725d ago (Edited 5725d ago )

@Caladbolg

Sony made an overall loss of 436million usd as Bucky posted.

However it was the gaming division that dragged them into the loss. The gaming division lost around 850million usd this includes PS2, PS3 and PSP and all the software sales etc.

Due to the gaming division the entire company was dragged into an over all loss of 436million usd.

@below

Thats something they predict they will be getting (also note that is figures relates to Sony as an organisation not just the gaming divison). It will just cancel out what they lost last year. Anyways you cant go on about predictions until they actually end up making the money.

Its not like Last year is the only year they have been loosing, they have been constantly making losses on the gaming division for some years now. Covering all that will take afew years. By then they will probably need to brace them selves for more losses on the PS4.

caladbolg7775725d ago (Edited 5725d ago )

The link Bucky provided is stating that Sony's Networked Products & Services division expects to post a $536.4m profit for the current fiscal year.

MrMccormo5725d ago

These are all fair comments, but I will still point out that it is Microsoft, not Sony or Nintendo, who is closing studios, losing virtually every one of their key employees in the Xbox division, and is coming out with fewer and fewer exclusives and fewer new IPs.

caladbolg7775725d ago (Edited 5725d ago )

I know it, Mccormo. I know it firsthand because I've worked at Microsoft Game Studios starting back in 2006.

dragonelite5725d ago

Microsoft just made 3~4 new studio last year wtf are you guys complaining fasa and ensemble a lot of personal got relocated, I know a lot of fasa members went to bungie.

From my head its already 8 month back i last talked about it.
Firebird studio's dedicated graphics studio
http://www.gameguru.in/micr...

Sub studio at rare
http://www.joystiq.com/2010...

big park games(kinect studio)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

ooh yeah dont forget 343 studios.

Bucky Sligo5725d ago (Edited 5725d ago )

Each company has different products in their divisions so it will be hard to get a fair comparison. Still though, my gut feel is that Msoft's entertainment division is financially better off than Sony's Networked Products & Services division, which houses each companies consoles.

@ MrMccormo
Based off the tidbits of news on N4G, that may be the case but we don't have a complete list of what MS opened and closed so I don't know if I agree with you.

alb18995725d ago

mrmccormo

Ooooh God knows i want to lose money as Microsoft does!

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 5725d ago
movements5725d ago

Don't believe MS. 2012 -- is still "years" away

frankymv5725d ago

Exactly.

2011 is also years away.

We'll see the 720 in fall 2011. For those who drink the MS cool aid and think otherwise.....LMAO.

5725d ago
frankymv5725d ago

actually, windows 8 is in 2012.

oh my...are you one of those that screams in horror at the thought of a new console since you have to save up?

vsr5724d ago

It merges windows live with xbox live i.e fully digital distribution. Then it will discontinue xbox because MS don't need bluray

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5724d ago
caladbolg7775725d ago (Edited 5725d ago )

"its the guys in 3rd place"

Time on the market:
360 - 5 years
Wii - 4 years
PS3 - 4 years

Approximate hardware totals since console launch:
360 - 43.2m
Wii - 74.0m
PS3 - 37.6m

1st - Wii (18.5m units/year)
2nd - PS3 (9.4m units/year)
3rd - Xbox360 (8.6m units/year)

YTD for 2010:
Wii - 8.5m
PS3 - 6.4m
360 - 6.1m

via VGChartz, no less. In reality, PS3 total in 4 years time is closer to 38.1m (0.5m more than VGchartz estimates; 9.5m units/year), while the 360 total is nearer to 41.7m (1.5m less than VGchartz estimates; 8.3m units/year) in 5 years time. The PS3 is selling over 1 million units more than the 360 every year.

Now, I'm not going to dance around proclaiming that the 360 is getting roflSTOMPED, but it's certainly in last place year over year. Maybe it's time to change strategies?

5725d ago
caladbolg7775725d ago (Edited 5725d ago )

Drop hard numbers and claim your sources, otherwise you're just blowing smoke out your anus. Prove that the PS3 is not outselling the 360 by about 1 million units a year (and I do mean per year, don't cherry-pick one month's sales from 2007), and I will apologize to you and return your bubble.

dragonelite5725d ago

yeah yeah whatever but you can't use VGchartz their numbers are a dice game. You can come you are forgetting that the last 2 gen sony was a household name for consoles. Sony lost big ass marketshare this gen microsoft&nintendo gained big ass marketshare compared to last 2 gens.

Still people must fucked up in the head wanting to see those companies go out the gaming biz. Really grow up or educate yourself.

More competition is win for us gamers if there wasn't a 360 this gen the ps 3 would still cost $600 because its the only hd system on the market.

morkendo235725d ago

do this mean 360 will use DVD9 for next 10-15 years? HOLDING back dev. from full BLU-RAY experience. so the DLC fiasco will CONTINUE on 360
while ps3 have full coverage game 10-15 years and more.

NewZealander5725d ago

im about ready for the next gen of consoles, its pretty clear they are nearly maxed out, we aren't going to see much that pushes the hardware now, so bring on something new!

i guess we have to put up with kinect and move games from here on out.

jessupj5725d ago

Speak for yourself. The 360 is clearly maxed out. There's just no way it can last past 2012 for the hardcore. Surely even the most rabid 360 fanboys will eventually jump ship when ms doesn't give them a single AAA title in months.

PS3 on the other hand is only just starting to stretch it's legs.

avengers19785725d ago

Years away like announced next year, released the year after.

JsonHenry5725d ago

Both companies do not want to release a new product to market during a world wide financial recession.

Longrod_Von_Hugendon5725d ago

"years away from contemplating what comes next"

Re-read this part Xwow. Oh you'll be waiting alright.

ABizzel15725d ago (Edited 5725d ago )

Well, 2012 release confirmed.

MadMan005724d ago (Edited 5724d ago )

@MrMccormo

LMFAO, did you REALLY just bring up that Sony has other things to make money from and not even mention MS? MS makes more money then Sony can even dream of, Sony knows it them selves. Member when they said they don't have money to throw around like MS does?

PS3 wasn't making much money at all at first ( Sony openly admitted this )
360 was making all the Money at first ( Common Sense )

Now it's the other way around PS3 is catching up now ( not like right now but within' the last year or so ) And Ps3 is some what winning it all depends on how you look at it System selling yes, game selling no...Sales RUN a company not if the buyers like a game, lol...Gotta look at that fact.

I expect MS to make a new console before PS3 after all it is more superior ( the ps3 )

This is coming from someone who prefers 360 over ps3 ( only because more RPGs to my taste )

Now please, if your gonna "try" and drop your fanboism all over people at least do it correctly.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 5724d ago
Omega45725d ago (Edited 5725d ago )

Xbox 720 will be announced in 2012 for 2013 release.

Kinect will ensure the 360 lasts 10 years.

@the two below
Laugh all you want cause you will just end up looking silly when I'm right

@Chris399
Reasoning? Its common sense really. MS won't announce a new console next year cause Kinect would have just been released at it would alienate all the new owners so 2012 will be the earliest.

Why o why5725d ago (Edited 5725d ago )

lmao

i mean kinect is the 360's product extension true but you're assuming it will be a success. Selling two million on release day is a commercial success but as a gaming tool it may be the total opposite....time will tell

edit

LMAO

Chris3995725d ago (Edited 5725d ago )

Other than your ability to regurgitate every piece of marketing hyperbole that you hear? Companies talk a lot of $hit. Greenburg said that FFXIII would outsell the PS3 version in America. Sony had a few choice comments (from crazy Ken, mostly) about people taking out second jobs to afford a PS3. Nintendo has said some deliciously contrary statements about their dedication to the "core". Point is, companies say a lot of things, most of which are geared toward getting your $.

Have you been paying attention to technology and trends at all? People are assuming that the 720/ PS4 are going to be these powerhouse machines, when they could really just be incremental changes. Nintendo taught everyone that you can make a sizable dent in the market with less impressive tech. If you think that Sony and MS are going to jump into the ring next time with bleeding edge tech, you're mistaken.

I expect new consoles sooner, rather than later.

Edit: @omega. You're assuming that Kinect will be a sustained, commercial success. What if it isn't? And I'm talking about continued sales beyond the holiday push.

A hearty LOL at "alienating" the MS consumer. This is a company with more hardware configurations, optional pieces and purchasable extras than the other two console makers; probably even more than ANY console ever, period. They don't give a hoot about fracturing the consumer base. In fact, it's almost as if their business model is driven by that methodology. That should be patently obvious.

imvix5725d ago

If they put out completely new hardware, we almost say bye bye to backward compatibility.

Chris3995725d ago

I don't think that it will be "new" at all. Bleeding edge tech is too expensive. It'll be an upgraded PS3/ 360/ Wii. There is this misconception that companies will stick to some long console cycle because it benefits the consumer, when in reality, none of these companies really give a crap about our needs (sure, some hide this fact better and offer more friendly products).

If it is advantageous to release a new console next year or early 2012, you can bet your as$ that any of the three will do it.

Persistantthug5725d ago (Edited 5725d ago )

If people's purse-strings are closed and on a budget, then so is it for most companies.

There's no reason for new systems to come out before 2012-2013, because even so, the advances would be marginal.

What? You think Microsoft is gonna release a new systems to LOSE money all over again in a world FINANCIAL CRISIS just to do HD? Really?

And then, why would Sony?

No offense, but a Nerd(s) desire and want for new tech and such, is not gonna superceed reality....not mine, not yours, and not anyone on N4G....that's just being real about it.

Chris3995725d ago

If you had read my posts, you'd note that I stated they would be more of a "refresh" than a new "generation", sort of like what Nintendo did with the Wii.

That itself is much cheaper than building a brand new architecture. Just add some RAM and a new graphics chip and you're good to go. Plus, it gives full to partial backwards compatibility.

The biggest advantage of course, would also be with who gets to go first. People's purse strings are not nearly as tight as you seem to think that they are, and most economists are of the opinion that the recession is over. Consumers are buying again, Ipads, phones, Justin Bieber tickets, whatever. So yeah, a new console in 1 to 1.5 more years of economic recovery isn't implausible at all.

Persistantthug5724d ago (Edited 5724d ago )

Why would they release a "revised" console that is only marginally better than what they have now?

You think Microsoft is going to want to release hardware only for it to be severely underpowered quickly, and then look old and feeble next to its competitors? Doing what you're suggesting still would cost ALOT of money, and still would be a marginal upgrade. Makes no sense.....especially not for Sony, because that's not what they do.

All Sony Consoles have been 10 times the power of before....I've seen no evidence of that changing.

(PS1 33mhz....PS2 300mhz....PS3 3.2Ghz)

Chris3995724d ago

That aside, technology is hitting a bit of a glass ceiling when it comes to the consumer end of things, graphics can only get so shiny.

I really believe that the next generation of consoles will not be such a quantum leap over their predecessors as they have been before. And I didn't suggest that Sony 'would' be first, I was just talking in vagaries, of what "could" happen. My personal thoughts: Nintendo > MS > Sony, in that order, for releasing new hardware.

I DO think that this gen has made the manufacturers far more prudent than before. They will be much more cautious about incurring 3-5 billion dollar losses at the expense of bleeding edge tech. Even more so, when you consider that not only is the playing field larger, but more competitive than ever before.

Anyhoo, that's my take. Peace.

Persistantthug5724d ago (Edited 5724d ago )

Sony's entire electronics business is about bringing out the next latest and greatest "tech thing"....it's simply what they do, have always done, and 10 years from now, they will still be doing that.

The ceiling you're talking about, I believe is true, it's also part of the reason why this gen. will probably go on for a bit longer than before (A year or 2). But no other significant changes will be made for Sony.

They'll still have a PS4 (or whatever it will be called) that will be approx equiv. to 10 cell processors and approx 8Gigs of ram.

That's simply Sony's way of doing business.
*shrug*

I estimate about 2013...possibly 2014, but the later is a bit long...but still possible.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5724d ago
RememberThe3575725d ago

Come on guys, at least he's optimistic.

5724d ago
btk5724d ago

Disk Formats - DVD < BR
Motion controller - Kinect < Move

Omega4
Maybe you would like to have a DVD player and defective camera for the next 5 years - but the rest of us sure won't be happy with it.

Kinect will most likely kill the XB360, not increase its ligespan.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5724d ago
Chris3995725d ago

Sony or MS could easily release a souped up version of their current hardware. A Xenon or Cell with added cache, maybe an extra thread or core, more RAM and a mid range (current) GPU. Graphics technology has hit a bit of a ceiling, so we won't be seeing too many gains in that department on any platform. Yes, PC games, always "look" better, but the output on HD consoles looks pretty good too. Especially when you consider that these machines are $150-$300 proprietary hardware that is 4-5 years old.

I've already said this, but if MS was smart, they'd release a closed-system, Xbox branded, entertainment center ready PC next gen and just call it a "console". If you had a "console" with PC AND disc-based gaming, that would be pretty incredible. It would also give them a foothold in the two sectors - PC and console - seeing as they've fumbled the ball a bit when it comes to Games for Windows.

Technology is headed toward a convergence anyhow. I believe that the next generation of consoles from Sony and MS will be similar to what I described above. Basically "branded" multi-media PCs with fixed hardware, closed-systems and fancy boxes. Nintendo, you never know, you can always count on them for something random :)

MrMccormo5725d ago

Y'know, I think we'd see someone else (Google, Sony, Apple, etc) do the first solid "convergence" console and then Microsoft would attempt it several years afterward.

However, your post was really well written and insightful. Bubs+

hiredhelp5724d ago

not cashe.they need is eaither a added core. or memory.

btk5721d ago

They tried that one before - the original XBox. Had to can it because the cost is too high. When you make tens of millions of the same device then it makes sense to build it specifically for that application. And why have a CPU that will never use 50% of its features in a console. Pushes the transistor budget up, meaning die size, power consumption, cooling components costs etc etc.

Consoles tend to be on the bleeding edge tech, with closed tightly integrated components to allow max performance from the machine.

JohnApocalypse5725d ago

That's good. I don't think anyone is ready for the next gen

Show all comments (98)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai26d ago (Edited 26d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio26d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing26d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9226d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit26d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing26d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9226d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay28d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn228d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn227d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown28d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay28d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay28d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac27d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger28d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300028d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde28d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde27d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7529d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_27d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.