YAY BUTTONS!

I honestly could not feel attached to a game if I didn't have some sort of controller. I never bought a Wii as I felt the controller was too lacking in accuracy so the Move is perfect for me. I don't own a 360, but I can't see Kinect giving me the experience I want anyway. I've done eyetoy to death and can't see Kinect being anymore of a Eyetoy on steroids than Move is a Wiimote on Steroids.

It's all in what you want as the gamer and for me, Move fits the bill. I've been playing since Thursday and loving every second of it especially as I get into the fine control you can exhibit in games like Table Tennis and Bocce. Hardcore gamers will love the finesse and precision that come with experience when using Move.

You cant even compare the two when one is not even out yet. But i did buy the move and love it i rather have something in my hand then pretending i am holding something doing some sort of action.

Like this guy's opinion matters. Just buy both, are you going to stop buying either one of them just because this guy said no?

I thought nintendo would do it ,.. no,.. it is sony,.. dont play it like wii,.. you will get owned,..

guys try it,.. It is fucking incredible,..

I was with a group of friends after I got the Move. We were playing Tiger Woods 2011 on the PS3, my friend and I showed our other friends some Move games. Even though they thought the Move games were fun and we had the option to play Tiger Woods with the Move, they opted to play with the controller instead.

Now if I had Kinect that wouldn't be possible, I would have to stand up and swing the invisible club. Choices are great aren't they?

If i want to play a hardcore gaming session then a pad is the way to go.

If i want to entertain then i suspect Kinect will be more appealing to the relatives, drunk buddies for a laugh.

Move is nice, don't get me wrong, but i just feel that's stuck in no-man's land whilst not offering the finely tuned precision of a pad but not as friendly to a party atmosphere that Kinect would be.

All just conjecture on my part but there it is...........

Kinect is bad. Move is ok from what I have seen. I dont want such a huge deadzone in MAG or KZ3 when playing with move.

the article is comparing playstation move vs. eyetoy?

I may be a PS3 only owner and I don't personally own a MOVE controller, but this is now the 3ed article I've seen on N4G about the same exact thing. Either admins don't look after their site for spammed articles, or everyone thinks they're a journalist. Unless you were in the Kinect beta and have access to it (along with a PS3 & MOVE), QUIT DOING COMPARISONS! Its one thing to call bullshit on what people like Greenberg spout constantly WAAAY before the thing is released, but it's another to really physically compare the two. I just wish this site was a real game news site & not just run by disgruntled nerds.

Kinect = on-rail games

I like buttons

Oh the irony. Since the PS3 was revealed everyone has been against it. Developers, reviewers, fanboys, haters and Mircosoft was in the front constantly predicting Sony's failure and spelling out their doom. And they took it all of it and kept on pushing foward. And now the tides look like they might be turning suddenly frantic fanboys are crying big pools of tears and finding as many negative things to say about them as possible. You are so desperate you are clinging to everything to make yourselves feel better from Halo Reach and 3DS to Kinect games that haven't even been released and the yet confirmed Wii2. BTW I really don't see what Mircosoft is doing that is so great. We already see what building Kinect games from the ground up results in. Barely functional, simple minded, no variety, clumsy shovelware. Sony already has more variety in their Move only games plus the fact that third parties can easily intregrate it into their games is a plus.It won't be long before Move has more games then Kinect.

With the Move and yes it's very accurate and can be fun, but at the end of the day it's a wii rip off. It is better but nothing new.

Playstation Move wins simply because it has buttons and games that have variety between hardcore and casual gamers.
I've yet to see a hardcore game on Kinect be used in a cool way to where gamers would be willing to spend $150 for that controller.
So, people should buy Kinect for Dance Central and Kinectimals (Skittles the Tiger).
Are you serious?
On top of that there's no way in hell a casual gamer is gonna spend a lot of money on either Move or Kinect when you can get the Wii for $200.
But I suppose the next best HD console those gamers could get that's similar to the Wii is the PS3 simply because Move is a more advanced Wii style controller.

I dont care if you "worked" hard MS, if you want to call it like that. Kinect is boring and looks a bit stupid, but Move is better, yes I can call it a MCH MUCH BETTER Wii and in HD but it has more action and you dont look like a dumbass moving like a mentally retarded like in Kinect´s Forza.

isnt it gorgeous how we treat animals.

That’s Zuckermans famous pig.

Move controller was extremely accurate great times back then

That definitely would have been the absolute worst time for stick drift to happen...

I always wanted a true to life surgery simulator for PSVR1. I always knew those Move controllers were precise AF under the proper conditions.

Move was a very accurate device under good conditions. Dr Marks even wanted to open it up for hobbyists and developers to extract more data to do more things. I even seen him use it for space, astronaut like simulations.

Sony always had the tech. They just needed the software to go with it. PS Move limit was not having an analog stick. Which it seems the PS5 controller made up for that.

I would like to see them use PS VR 2 for surgery or something with that eye tracking built in.

At least it wasn’t used for a mini-sub