are too true for the kinect lovers to comprehend.

I disagree, The day we can plug ourselves into matrix style machine's they will be replaced! But really it depends on the type of game, For example A dance game that works well without buttons i.e Dance Central, while shooters etc will never work till the aforementioned Matrix capabilities exist!

I never understand. I must have dreamed the whole thing. I could have sworn it was Mircosoft who got up in E3 and said 'controller less gaming is the future'. You guys remember that right? Also wasn't it Mircosoft who made fun of Sony for making the Move and claimed that they didn't want to put a piece of plastic in your hands. Any yet here they are giving you a Steel Battlalion contoller with about 50 buttons, saying the same thing Sony said about not wanting to replace the controller and boasting Kinect/controller conjunction. And when ever I bring it up I get a million disagrees and lose my bubbles. So I must have long term memory loss or something because Mircosoft seems to be saying the opposite to what they said before and taking the same path as Move. If I am wrong I must need a catscan for my head or something

I agree buttons are irreplaceable

BUT..... Gaming is evolving and in the next gen I believe buttons will not be needed certain games are better implanted without buttons while others are better with

So let's say half and half

I thought this when Sony released the Eyetoy and I still think the same with Kinect; gaming is synonymous with controllers and buttons as input devices and i dont think that can ever change.

There is no way yo can play any proper genre of gaming (shooter, sports, fighting etc) without the use of a controller.

Dr. Marks made motion controllers:
EyeToy / PS Eye
2x PS Eye for 3d
Move controller

and many that we are not aware of...
I think in the past ten years he might have a good idea of what he is talking about.

MS just went shopping for some tech to have an answer to the Wii and Move. Sony invested over ten years of research and product development. Which one to trust?

I think this is a good marketing strategy for Sony to highlight this. They need to bash Kentic non stop because the reality will be when Kentic is realeased it's going to outsell MOVE by large margins and Sony knows it. So Sony is wise to keep up these attack comments and ADS.

Buttons!?! If we can lose em then its all good. Move is good fun, but it won't be near as enjoyable as Kinect if MS hit the ball running. Sony should worry as they haven't innovated at all this generation. I won a move starter pack, played it for the day and put it down, until they release games on par with Mario Galaxy, innovative shovel ware and possibly something 'New' that we haven't seen before, its a fail in my book. Dance Central wipes the floor with anything on Wii or PS3 for the motion-controller generation. What can move do that Nintendo hasn't already done!?! Everything... more like Nothing! It only does copying! Come on Sony, your better than that, how about a hugely ambitious physics engine with Cell to take more than full advantage of Move, I am hoping it delivers but cannot see it happening.

isnt it gorgeous how we treat animals.

That’s Zuckermans famous pig.

Move controller was extremely accurate great times back then

That definitely would have been the absolute worst time for stick drift to happen...

I always wanted a true to life surgery simulator for PSVR1. I always knew those Move controllers were precise AF under the proper conditions.

Move was a very accurate device under good conditions. Dr Marks even wanted to open it up for hobbyists and developers to extract more data to do more things. I even seen him use it for space, astronaut like simulations.

Sony always had the tech. They just needed the software to go with it. PS Move limit was not having an analog stick. Which it seems the PS5 controller made up for that.

I would like to see them use PS VR 2 for surgery or something with that eye tracking built in.

At least it wasn’t used for a mini-sub