All Channels
Popular
200°

Dyack Predicts A One Console Future

At his GCDC lecture, Silicon Knights' Denis Dyack presented his case that with an unsustainable current business model, a 'one console future' was not just possible, but probable as early as the 'next round of hardware' -- describing how the shift would be good for both creators and consumers.

In today's monopolistic model, three proprietary hardware manufacturers have gone in three different directions: the PS3 with its Cell processor, the Xbox 360 with its 3 CPUs and Xbox Live, and the Wii, with its 'socialized interface hardware.'

Read Full Story >>
gamasutra.com
Dr Pepper6899d ago (Edited 6899d ago )

And what happens when the competition is totally erased and the "one console" company takes advantage of the consumers? With no other systems available, they can make the hardware, accessories, games etc. as expensive as they want, since the person buying it has no other choices.

And then what happens when they start having very different views on certain situations? They split into two companies and another console is formed later and we have started all over again.

Edit: "way too many games," according to Dyack. I found this pretty funny. Better too many games than too little, at least in my opinion.

QuackPot6899d ago (Edited 6899d ago )

Ps1 & Ps2

Nobody was screwed by Sony's dominance. Over whelmingling happy gamers and huge selection of games.

Microsoft came into the game console industry NOT so that it can form an alliance with Sony, Ninetendo etc to make a standard console but to dominate it and make a lot of money. They are prepared to take huge losses to achieve this(eg the xbox and likely the xbox 360 if they abandon it as well for an xbox 720).

Each of the three main console makers are out to make money and want to maintain control of their business.

The best way for there to be a single console now would be a winner in the console war - Playstation or Xbox. I'm excluding Wii as it's not next gen.

If you know anything about Microsoft's monopoly and practises with Windows on the PC over the last 20 years, you'd be a fool to want Microsoft to win the console war.

Damn. If Micorsoft never entered this industry, a lower specd & cheaper Ps3 would most likely be dominating the market now as well as Halo and Gears be running on it. But that's what if.

Let the war continue. I hope this generation finally gives us a clear winner so a certain manufacturer will finally get out of the industry and focus on what it does best - Games development.

Kholinar6899d ago (Edited 6899d ago )

I love ducks, so I'm all for your username.

Let me say though, that while Microsoft has been bad with a monopoly, I haven't seen that Sony's been better even without a monopoly.

Rootkits, Atrac, memorystick, etc. are all examples of Sony trying to lock people into their products and protect their interests above those of consumers. They may be getting better after all of this (Bluray is fairly open) but a monopoly could be a nightmare. I'm not sure they've learned yet. Microsoft has been more open lately too, and I wouldn't trust them if they paid me several billion.

I'm not sure I'd feel safe with any of these companies in charge.

On the other hand, what this guy is saying just sounds like destroying consoles and going on to pc's to me. I really like custom gaming hardware instead. With this you'd be upgrading videocards and drivers would cause instability, etc. Viruses/worms would become that much more prevalent cause you'd be using a standardized architecture...

tplarkin76899d ago

Denis is comparing it to cell phone technology and VCRs. So, it won't be a single company controlling and profiting from a console. It will be many companies making their own consoles to a single specification. This reminds me of IBM PC "compatible" computers.

There was a day when IBM was the sole manufacturer of PCs. There were many "brands" of computers, such as Tandy, Texas Instruments, and Apple. They all competed for market dominance. Guess who won the PC war? Microsoft.

Compaq was the first compatible computer and thus started the "unification" of hardware for computers. Perhaps the unified console will be the PC? If they make the PC smaller and as simple as a console, then it may happen.

Gizmo_Logix6899d ago

Kholinar,

Sony never had a monopoly in any market. Even during the PS2 days (65%). That's far from the 90% that Microsoft has in the operating system market. Just wanted to point that out.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6899d ago
d3l33t6899d ago

this is horse $hit. There is no way, and if there was a possible way that only one console would be released, it would be horrible for games. As a gamer, I like choice. In games, AND in consoles.

QuackPot6899d ago (Edited 6899d ago )

Halo, Gears, Bioshock, Forza etc can all be written and optimized for the Ps3.

Likewise LBP, HS, R&C etc for xbox 360.

Games developers are always in competition with one another. The consoles only get involved when publishers/developers make their games exlusive to a particular console.

I say get rid of exclusives altogether.

Let the Hardware stand on its own merits and not have exclusive games being the main reason to buy it.

bluegoblin6899d ago

it should be called nintendo.

SwiderMan6899d ago

This coming from the developer of Too Human, which was original a PSX game?

Get working on your nearly 10-year old game. It's starting to make Duke Nukem Forever look good.

ItsDubC6899d ago

While his theory about commodification makes sense, I just don't see it happening in the realm of console technology. Some have said the same thing about the PC market and we all know that PCs come in different formfactors, configurations, and brands.

The reason I think his theory falls short is that Nintendo is already taking advantage of and correcting the characteristics of the industry that he points to as the eventual causes for commodification.

In keeping w/ familiar yet older hardware specs this generation, Nintendo has effectively given 3rd-parties breathing room when it comes to developing games. Lower development costs for Wii games means developers are exposed to less risk and more profit potential. The same is true for DS development.

Also, because Nintendo has profitted from every Wii sold from the beginning, there is less pressure to put the burden of recouping hardware costs on 3rd-parties, which is something Dyack also outlined.

Avid gamers may scoff at casual games, but sales of those casual games will keep devs in business by helping to make up for big-budget flops and by helping to fund the next big-budget hit.

Kholinar6899d ago

Well said.

Nintendo has made some colossal mistakes in past gens. They seem to be learning a bit.

Show all comments (38)
60°

Final Fantasy X 25th Anniversary Website Launches With New Nomura Artwork and Merchandise

Square Enix launches Final Fantasy X 25th anniversary site, revealing new Nomura art, books, music releases, and merchandise.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
-Foxtrot73d ago

Look I know VIII has its issues and all that but how on earth can the do big anniversary events with new artwork and merchandise for VII, IX and X yet VIII got sweet f*** all.

They could have given it something during its 25th anniversary yet all it got was a single Happy Anniversary post on their social media.

solideagle72d ago

they should know that we are OG fans of VIII as it sold truckload as well. not as much as VII or X. I personally didn't like IX but X and VI are my personal fav.

Shadow Hearts 2 covenant is another game I love. I hope one day someone can make remake, I would be delighted

Relientk7772d ago

Final Fantasy VIII is great and you are always the first to defend it in the comments

50°

Why the Wii is Such a Nostalgic System in 2026

The Wii is now a retro console. Let’s get nostalgic about an often maligned system.

Read Full Story >>
downupjourney.com
ActualWhiteMan79d ago (Edited 79d ago )

Crazy to think the WII is to the Switch 2, as the NES was to the WII back then. 20 Year difference.

jznrpg78d ago

My wife asks me to bust it out (heh) everyone once in a while to play bowling and tennis with the kids. There was a ton of slop on it but some good stuff as well.

Smellsforfree78d ago

Wii was great but boy howdy did it cause Microsoft to go on a dark walk with the Kinect and the disastrous XBox One launch that they arguably never recovered from.

Loktai78d ago

Not nostalgic for me.. I was there.. anyone who wasnt a little kid realized it was a gamecube with shit tacked onto it, it was the "joke" system and was well below even the switch in terms of comparing it to the latest machines at the time. The machine was well loved by young people and "casual gamers" who now remember it 20 years on, or in most cases more of its sales came in the 15-20 years ago range not right at launch- but again its not nostalgic for people who were "gamers" then really, just for those who ended up with one in their house, the games , graphics, interface and online features were archaic already in 2006.

40°

15 Years Ago, Mortal Kombat (2011) Saved Gaming’s Biggest Fighting Franchise

A brutal reset, a smarter story, and a return to what made it great—Mortal Kombat (2011) revived the series.

Read Full Story >>
fortressofsolitude.co.za
italiangamer81d ago

"Gaming’s Biggest Fighting Franchise"

Press X to (seriously) doubt.

DarXyde79d ago

Underrated comment. I used to hate that game so much that any time my siblings asked me to play it, I just picked Hom and shut myself down mid-match.

Soy80d ago

And then MK1 killed it again.

DivineHand12579d ago (Edited 79d ago )

15 years went by so fast. I remember playing through the story mode at launch.