All Channels
Popular
60°

Move, multiplayer, and 3D being “looked into” for InFamous 2

VG247 writes: Sony has said Sucker Punch is looking into multiplayer, Move support, and 3D for Infamous 2.

Speaking with Hip Hop Gamer at PAX Prime earlier this month, the Move support bit is rather interesting because at one time, InFamous 2 was shown on Sony’s Move page, but we’ve gone back to it and it’s been removed.

At least it’s being “looked into” then. Not that it’s an admission, but better than nothing we suppose.

InFamous 2 is out next year.

Watch the Hip Hop interview below.

MGRogue20175730d ago (Edited 5730d ago )

omg.. That guy is making developers look bad.. Get rid of that damn title belt please ffs lol

Anyway.. The game is going to be fantastic, 'nuff said.

InfectedDK5730d ago

The developer doesn't look bad at all imo

simplyRealistic185729d ago (Edited 5729d ago )

i would rather they don't add any of those , If they are now contemplating on weather to add this, this late in the developement, then forget about, it will just feel tacked on

If it wasn't thought of since the beginning of developement then just leave out until next time

Shmotz5730d ago

I'd much rather has the entire dev team focused on a fantastic single player. Now, if both modes were being built at the same time it might be different.

Sev5729d ago

Agreed. Please. Single player only, and make it the very best SP mode possible.

belal5729d ago

people just want to get something bad on HHG even when he is right.Grow up people.

And pliz don't say that he is bad and all, he delivers exclusive interviews that everyone o this forum can only dream of. HHG if you can see this, well done!

vickers5005729d ago

He lies and misleads. That's why I hate him. If he didn't do that, there would be no reason to hate him (other than his horrible grammar), but if he didn't do those things, he wouldn't be famous, so what are ya gonna do?

I also find it funny that by the logic of the majority of his viewers, anybody who dislikes or criticizes him is somehow jealous of him. The ego on some people is astonishing.

HyperBear5729d ago

Move support would be awesome. 3D...meh. it would kinda be a hit or miss with that one (I'd say just leave it be, and have the game running at 1080p at 60fps). and with MP, it could be done, but they would need a separate dev team to solely work on the MP and make sure they implement everything that makes InFamous what it stands for, and then properly make it work with online gaming. But Sucker Punch will do what they think is best, and we will all know in 2011...

darkdoom30005729d ago

I highly dout the game runs at 1080p as only a handful of ps3 games actually do. -most being small PSN titles.

Not sure whether it runs at 60fps. Locked at 30 would be good enough.(no slowdown pls)

darkdoom30005729d ago

Initally I would have said "No Multiplayer"
But I really enjoyed Uncharted 2's multiplayer. My second fav MP game on PS3 (behind MGO)If sucker punch can do what ND did and produce an excellent single player and awesome multiplayer then go ahead!

Move support? Yes pls!

Show all comments (21)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
30d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted29d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8529d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele29d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk29d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay29d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 29d ago
Athlon10129d ago (Edited 29d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit29d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg28d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10128d ago (Edited 28d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14929d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
42d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_42d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle42d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker42d ago (Edited 42d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit42d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog42d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_42d ago (Edited 42d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog42d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad42d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_42d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage42d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda42d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

42d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong68d ago

looks god awful on the base systems