Cheap shots. When Bethesda make perfect games themselves then maybe they should start knocking other people's work. I weasn't impressed with FO3 myself, and though I was in the minority of those who played the game(in not liking it that much) I still think people will accept my reasons, in the main, as fair points. The game was under trested leaving us buyers in the usual position with Bethesda of paying to do QA testing, the core shooting was rubbish and VATS was too arbitrary(it didn't seem to respect it's own percentages, imho)-and I could go on, but won't.

Point is I don't like the way devs this gen are always ready to push their stuff not by saying how great it is(and why) but by talking crap about stuff they have nowt to do with. It's not classy and there are much better ways to try and sell western style games in the East than rubbishing a genre still very successful out there-this stance may even come off as arrogant and the3 Japanese will NOT like that at all.

Christ, Bethesda even recycled so much of TES4:Oblivion for FO3 that it managed to have, again imho, less atmosphere, or not as convincing an atmosphere as the first two games did. Were their own games perfect I'd give them more credit but even then it wouldn't be classy, would it? "I wish my new game had had SOME QA so there weren't always game crashing bugs and glitches", "I'm tired of the FP aiming being borked on my supposed FPS RPG hybrid" or "I'm sick to death of being reminded of the last game because I'm looking at it, just with some rubble chucked in, hearing ALL the same actors and constantly fighting deja vu to get any sense of immersion from what should be an amazing experience"-they just ask for this kind of rubbish if they're gonna call out others over their shortcomings, aren't they? We all have faults but using others to advertise your game is a bit naff-seriously-in my eyes.