Gamertag Radio writes: "I recorded this debate at the COD Black Ops event. HipHopGamer & Vicious696 debates about Kinect vs PS Move."
A group of surgeons made headlines after they managed to perform an endoscopic procedure on a pig located in Hong Kong by using PlayStation controllers. It involved the use of a PS5 DualSense controller as well as a PlayStation Move controller.
Yet another powerful device Sony gave up supporting. KZ3 move was one of the best motion controller implementation ever
That's really cool. It's crazy something like that is possible with gaming controllers 1000's of miles away.
Air Conflicts: Secret Wars debuted in 2011, and later updated for modern consoles. However, it's the PlayStation 3 edition that stands out.
Joy Ride Turbo launched 10 years ago today. The first title was Xbox Kinect exclusive, yet this sequel failed to support the device at all.
nuff said
point 1:
not everyone casual or hardcore bought a wii.i'm core,and i didn't see wii as a revolution because it didn't do what it claimed.even with motion+.so i didn't buy wii.but i do see Move as an evolution of the wiimote as the dualshock was to the original ps1 controller.and this is coming from someone that had 3 gamecubes and every other nintendo system.move creates deeper gameplay options over the wiimote.
point 2:
move will have online gaming.wii has poor online gaming.nintendo doesn't care about online as they want gamers to play together offline.but then,sony can do both.4 moves offline with friends *AND* a great online structure.again,sony can offer more options over
point 3
the move is accurate.allows you to play as if you were playing in real life.wii sports may be fun.but it won't increase you gaming ability if all you have to do is flick your wrist and just waggle.in sony's sports game,you actually have to play as we seen with the dad and his son.that can be fun and increase you gaming ability.
point 4
gamers always have to wait for nintendo's small selection of 1st party titles.when i had gamecube,i was waiting forever for 1st part games.so i sold it.won a second one in a contest.played it for awhile then sold that.then bought a cheap,used one later but my memory cards corrupted.so i had no need to go back to it.and most of nintendo's exclusive capcom titles came over to ps2.and with sony's 20+ 1st party developers,i don't have to wait as long on quality content.and sony has created many hits this gen that rival anything nintendo has made.
point 5
kinect is limited.anyone that says otherwise is lying to themselves.no controller means a less deep experience.just look at the launch lineup.it's obvious just like the eyetoy ans pseye.but we can definitely see that move allows 3D interaction.and that's not even talking about 3D tvs.kinect has only showed 2D interaction.the same thing we have seen with eyetoy/pseye.
point 6 and my final point
lets say kinect sells more,does that mean it's quality is better?should i buy it because the masses are buying it like a fad?maybe i should go out and buy wiifit.that must be an awesome game for a core gamer like me.but i'm not fat and i'm pretty fit.i do real stuff to stay fit.if kinect sells more,what deep gameplay will it offer over move?sony still has the eye.it can head track,voice recognize,has facial recognition ,scanning of objects and gesture options too.
(watch the first 20 seconds)
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
what will kinect offer gamers that is so ***DEEP***????
a $150 dollar dashboard remote?
How is there still any sort of debate about this?
The PS Move is the only motion control solution out of the two that will have any sort of positive effect on hardcore gaming.
Kinect is a pure gimmick aimed purely at the casuals and core gamers shouldn't be interested in it because it's laggy, unresponsive, the hardware is limited and you can't play proper games on it. I'm pretty sure that's NOT what hardcore gamers want from their games. They like precision, responsiveness and feedback from their controllers. If Kinect had any shot at being any good, Microsoft shouldn't have removed that processing chip. Now it's good for nothing but casual and lifestyle games.
PS Move has proved itself with real games, intuitative developer demos, and is suitable for any sort of game for any type of gamer.
Kinect hasn't proved anything, other than it can provide experiences that the EyeToy was able to do years ago, and that the Playstation Eye can provide right now. And Microsoft has made it perfectly clear what their goal is with it. Kinect is a waste of resources and just a distraction to the industry.
Now before anyone tries to have a go at me, I'm just being realistic here.
Edit: On another note - It's kinda ironic that MS are touting Kinect as you being the controller (apparently making the experience more immersive), because when you have nothing to hold you are less attached to what you are doing within the game. When you have something to hold and interact with, you feel more connected. Microsoft really hasn't thought this through.
The GAMES on the Ps3 will sell the move when people see how awesome they are! The shoot, Killzone 3, Dead space 2, Heavy Rain, The Agent, Heroes on the Moves, Time Crisis 1 2 3 4, start the party, RESIDENT EVIL 5, Little Big Planet 2, Socom 4, and thats just in the first six months of the Launch... Thats more than the WII and Kenect Combined. However the Xbox fan base has already Preordered over 100,000 Kinects, Showing once again that HYPE can be more effective than Quality when selling a product....cough cough Halo reach...
Move FTW!!