Dumb du dumd dumb....

PS3 version of games should always look superior

The game is indeed developed on the PS3 as Platinum said they didnt want another Bayonetta fiasco so this time the designed it around PS3 and ported it to Xbox and according to them was a major success expect them to do this from now on

Good thing they learned there lesson from the Bayonetta fiasco. Too bad i only own a PS3 and couldn't really see the game in its full potential (talking about Bayo of course). Hopefully Bayo 2 (or more hopefully Jeanne's game *wishes*) won't have crappy framerate.

Here we go again. I'll be expecting demo comparisons next week.

"So no matter which console you have, you have nothing to worry about"

That's the way it should be.

Bayonetta on x360 was on a whole other level than its Ps3 counterpart.

They better get this Vanquisher thing right. Even though Bayo for PS3 was ported over by Sega it was really no excuse for such a poor port.

I will believe it when I see it.

A game like that feels more at home on the PS3 than the 360. Kinda like DMC does. Ironically, PS3 customers must've thought the same, who bought more copies of Bayonetta than their 360 counterparts. But I played both versions... and well... there's no need to throw salt in the wound. We all know what happened.

Which is why this news makes me happy. Vanquish feels like it belongs on PS3 and I'm willing to bet, history will repeat itself, and 360 owners will sleep on this one too. Reach will be out/or will be coming out around the same time. And in the world of 360 only, nothing holds as much weight or attention.

I still a little sour over what the did with bayonetta, not to mention im a little tired of shooters. i probably won't pick this up.

Yea...yap yap yap...i call B.S

Think about it, why would you come out with DAMAGE CONTROL

before the release of the game??????????????

Expect Digital Foundry to give the real truth and not

this PR bull

...no matter what the developer says, critics will try to find a graphical difference to determine a better game. Contrary to PlayStation 3 exclusives, many critics will say graphics don't mean anything and it's all about the game-play? If, so why look for graphical differences if game-play is more important?

The developer shouldn't even have to bring this up, it should be expected.

Statement can and maybe be a lie! :\

i dont understand why all multiplatform games dont take advantage of ps3 capabilities like mlaa

What i find funny about bayonetta is the fact the game does not look good compared to today titles at all.

It's similar to DMC4 imo. Its ok, nothing more then that.

So of course considering that, it's a poor port. No spu's were used, just single ppe.

If as they say they've written the engine this time instead of sega porting it, i'm sure it'll be fine.

To achieve parity,the so call 360 port is going to be downgrade most likely!Im going to love if digital foundry makes a face-off between the Bayonetta engine and Vanquish engine and the final verdict is that 360 engine for bayonetta is better than the Vanquish one,mostly regarding how smooth the engine is going to run and if it can achieve the same 60fps that bayonetta achieve on the 360!Not to mention all the transparency effects the 360 version of bayonetta had that were missing on the PS3!Now lets see how Vanquish stacks against that on both platforms!

show me..dont believe anything you say...after bay

Bayonetta on PS3 was gimped but it's a good game nevertheles.. i hope they don't screw this up.

this is what all developers need to do. EQUALITY! both version of the game should be no different from other.

Who cares about small stupid insignificant differences between console versions. One can't notice them unless they really try to. Oh there isn't grass here or a shadow there. Who gives a flying fck? Play the damn games and stop worrying about things that you won't notice or that won't effect your experience. The only thing I would care about is difference in resolution. For example, there is no way I would get FF XIII on 360 when I have a PS3. Though if I didn't have a PS3, I wouldn't be buying one just for that. Its all about what console has the best exclusives and that's the PS3. That's all that matters. Full stop!

I remember Ghostbusters the PS3 was the lead console and the 360 version destroyed it in every catedory....so i expect the same to happen on Vanquish.

I cant wait for this game, probably in my top 3 wants for the fall. I love my single player experiences.

they said the same thing about ff13.....o.0

Platinum Games made FF XIII? Come on guys this is retarded, just buy the game for whatever system you prefer.

G4 tried out Vanquish and it was the PS3 version.

bayonetta was the first game on consoles that i could actually see the difference. not only did it look better on 360 but ran better. so they really got to make it up to ps3 fans on this one. the only other game, i could see somewhat of a difference was final fantasy on the ps3 that looked better but nowhere near bayonetta.

We got a demo coming this monday and tuesday we'll get a good idea of how it plays out

good article

I was very dissapointed in this lackluster, boring and uninformative posting, this guy needs to try harder, theres nothing of any value here.

Now that Jim Ryan is gone just need to remove Herman Hulst from his position! And maybe give Shuhei the position he deserved.

This gen hasn't been the best for games, last gen consoles are still out there and now there's been talk of the PS6 and Xbox Two for a year or so. Many games this gen will be ported to next gen and the cycle will continue. The re-release of the Neo Geo AES+, games on cartridge for £70 ($95), gaming is going back in time. Gaming has gone pricing mad with the high cost of games, consoles and controllers. The men and women at the top are clueless.

It’s always interesting to hear behind-the-scenes stories like this, especially involving veterans like Shuhei Yoshida and leadership figures like Jim Ryan. That said, there are usually multiple sides to decisions at that level. It could be less about not “listening” and more about differences in long-term vision for PlayStation. Yoshida played a huge role in shaping the brand, so whatever the reason, his impact is undeniable.

If true, and I'm inclined to believe it is, it goes to show that Sony lost their way when they became more western/didn't respect the PlayStation origin story. Andrew House and Jack Tretton did great work, but they also didn't try to fundamentally change the PlayStation DNA. Ryan oversaw the death of Japan Studio and a live service direction.

I already figured this, good lord imagine if Shuhei took over instead, would've been a platinum era 😩

I miss the first three generations of PlayStation. The way they turned PS3 around, we knew they meant business. We were all worried for a bit there around launch. Eventually from 2008 they started shifting slowly. But since Yoshida was fired, it's never been the same. Still enjoy my PS5 daily. I got a backlog dating back to PS2 lol So I'm fine but new games aren't as appealing anymore.

It seems like we were thrown on to the worst timeline possible where everything is too expensive and the wrong people were put in positions that makes the world a shitty place. We could have had Shu as the head of PS but we got the shitty alternative. Same goes for everyone in power around the world. Doesn’t matter the company or country the majority of us got the shitty picks and the world is declining like never before. I do think PS can come out of this because of their studios, talent and IP but they need someone more in touch with gamers leading things like Shu was. They’re still the best place for console gaming imo but it could be much better than it is especially without the massive live service failures. The rest of the world I have a lot less hope for right now. Hopefully the pendulum swings back towards the good ole days but I’m preparing for the worst.

There goes illuminati distraction story

So now there's certifiable proof that Ryan was in fact "fired", as opposed to when it was first announced that he "retired", in order to save face.

There's another guy who recently "retired" as CEO of another large gaming company, after doing a dismantling job as lead for well over a decade.

seems legit, the business man, fires the one who has ideas to move the business forward.

Jim Ryan is the reason why we are entering year 6 since the PS5 launch and many of us don't feel like the PS5 has gotten started as yet.

I hope going forward, we will see a return to form.