All Channels
Popular
360°

Sony: PSN Plus Subscriptions “Above Expectations”

Sony’s PlayStation Network subscription service, PSN Plus, is nearly two months old but seems to be taking off fast.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
rroded5760d ago (Edited 5760d ago )

Ta gouge your customers by making em pay ta play online
peeps are happy nough to pay for a few bonus frills a few free games discounts beta access core n more ta come why not XD

Lou-Cipher5760d ago (Edited 5760d ago )

7 out of 21 of my PSN friends have PlayStation Plus.

33% of my friends list is using PS Plus, that's not bad at all. If Sony could get even 10% of the near 40 Million PS3 owners to get PS Plus, that would be a huge win for Sony.

I just hope Sony uses alot of that extra profit for more PSN experiences, instead of keeping 99.9% of it like Microsoft does.

Lord_Doggington5760d ago (Edited 5760d ago )

0% of my real life friends bought this crud

8-bit5760d ago (Edited 5760d ago )

21 PSN friends? I am at the max, I constantly have to do deletes in order to add people. Almost half of my friends are on PSN+

I am waiting to see what kind of beta's we get into..

OSU_Gamer5760d ago (Edited 5760d ago )

@Lou-Cipher

Unless you know what MS specifially spends their money on, they you have no idea how much MS "keeps" of that money.

Saying that they keep 99.9% percent of it is just ignorant.

Whether you like or hate Kinect and the new 360S....R&D alone for those two items is very pricey.

Edit:

I think you should be complaining about what MS spends there money on, not for "keeping" the money.

MmaFanQc5760d ago

and im also a member and im happy with the service(im in canada)

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5760d ago
Game-ur5760d ago

I'm more interested in getting expanded services then free games; I hope they have plans for this in the future.

DERKADER5760d ago

I thought PSN+ would be an upgraded service with cool features. Turns out it's just a discount card so far.

lazysey5760d ago (Edited 5760d ago )

expectation being less than or equal to 1

WildArmed5760d ago

Half (if not more) of my 97 friends on PSN are PSN+ members. So yeah, I think it's nice to have an option to pay for the service..
then have your online experience obsolete due to you not paying
(not that it's not bad, it's just my honest opinion)

Playerz85760d ago

Only 1 out of my 70+ friends has PS+. I'm not so sure about that.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5760d ago
cliffbo5760d ago (Edited 5760d ago )

looking promising

5760d ago Replies(5)
StarScream4Ever5760d ago

I for one demand data graph, charts, figures, and excel on this "above expectations".

BeaArthur5760d ago

Yeah, how are we supposed to know what expectations were?

Show all comments (48)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
35d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted35d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8534d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele34d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk34d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay34d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 34d ago
Athlon10135d ago (Edited 35d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit34d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg34d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10134d ago (Edited 34d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14934d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
48d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_48d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle47d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker48d ago (Edited 48d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit47d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog48d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_47d ago (Edited 47d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog47d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad47d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_47d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage47d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda47d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

47d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong73d ago

looks god awful on the base systems